Frontier Crimes Regulation

Pakistan Supreme Court Condemns Indefinite Detention Without Charges

While the US enters its eleventh year of maintaining the Guantanamo Prison that Barack Obama pledged to close by the end of 2009, Pakistan now finds itself in the glare of international condemnation for its own practice of indefinite detention without charges. Just last month, Amnesty International released a report (pdf) in which they pointed out widespread torture and abuse in Pakistan’s tribal areas while prisoners are held by the military and intelligence agency without charges:

Amnesty International research shows that, rather than seeking to apply and strengthen the human rights safeguards of Pakistan’s ordinary criminal justice system in the Tribal Areas, the Pakistani authorities are applying old and new security laws that authorise prolonged, arbitrary, preventive detention by the Armed Forces, and breach international human rights law. The Actions (in Aid of Civil Power) Regulations 2011 (AACPR) in particular, along with the century-old Frontier Crimes Regulation 1901 (FCR),5 provide a framework for widespread human rights violations to occur with impunity.

Both the AACPR and FCR come into play in a case argued today in Pakistan’s Supreme Court. From Reuters, we learn that although this case addresses just 11 men (now 7 due to four deaths, more on that later), the government now admits that over 700 are being held without charges:

Pakistan is holding 700 suspected Islamist militants without charge under a law that has come under fire from human rights groups, its attorney general said on Thursday.

The admission marked the first time that the strategic U.S. ally detailed how many militants it is holding in the tribal areas of the northwest under the Actions in Aid of Civil Power Regulations law.

“There is a military operation in Waziristan. Under the law we cannot try these 700 people, nor can we release them, unless the operation is over,” Attorney General Irfan Qadir told the Supreme Court, referring to a tribal area near the Afghan border.

The Reuters report, however, seems to miss the mark on several important issues in this story. First, Reuters says the case is about “seven suspected militants held without charge since May 2010″. Both Dawn and the Express Tribune point out in their stories today that the case originated with 11 men. Here is how Dawn describes that part of the background:

The 11 prisoners in the said case went missing from the gate of Rawalpindi’s Adiyala Jail on May 29, 2010 after they had been acquitted of terrorism charges pertaining to their alleged involvement in the October 2009 attacks on the Army General Headquarters and the Inter-Services Intelligence’s (ISI) Hamza Camp in the garrison town.

Later, four of the 11 died in mysterious circumstances. The Supreme Court forced the ISI and military intelligence to produce the remaining seven men in court on February 13 — an unprecedented move. The men, all in deteriorating health, were sent to the Lady Reading Hospital in Peshawar on court orders. After five of them recovered, they were shifted to an internment centre in Parachinar.

The other point that Reuters seems to miss comes when Reuters says of the men that the “Supreme Court is calling for their release” while it appears on closer reading of the Pakistani press that the “release” is from military detention into the hands of civilian authorities who would then try the men. Here is the Express Tribune: Continue reading

Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz @PhilPerspective @PogoWasRight @walterwkatz @nbc @NBCSports @F1onNBCSports And F1 is FAR bigger than that EPL garbage
38mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @PhilPerspective @PogoWasRight @walterwkatz The what? So @NBC @NBCSports @F1onNBCSports cut off the worlds biggest sporting league for that?
39mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Bill requires all electronic communications service providers to maintain metadata for 3 years and provide it under new "System."
49mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel You should all think of Burr's bill as iCALEA under guise of a dragnet extension. it addresses some of issues Comey claims are encryption.
50mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @PrivacyQuest As I suggested, lot lot of what Comey cares abt is iMessage, FaceTime data. That's what Burr's bill would get @biasedreporter
51mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @apb44 @F1 @nbc @NBCSports @F1onNBCSports Grrrrrrrrr!!!
59mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @apb44 @F1 @nbc @NBCSports @F1onNBCSports I wouldn't know, I can't get any coverage!
59mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @PogoWasRight Yes, but the shitbag @F1onNBCSports livestream just froze up+crapped out. Now just ads. Completely worthless @NBC @NBCSports
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel .@biasedreporter Part of what he & McConnell are trying to do w/dragnet expansion is to collect data he's really worried abt wrt encryption
1hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz .@F1 @nbc @NBCSports @F1onNBCSports ...who refuses to competently cover the biggest F1 race of the year. You should rethink your priorities.
1hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Hey @F1, you always talk about wanting better US audience, and then you partner w/total shitbag network like @NBC @NBCSports @F1onNBCSports
1hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @PogoWasRight @F1onNBCSports Got it now thanks! Just stunned at incompetence+bad faith by @NBC @NBCSports I'm sure they won't respond either
1hreplyretweetfavorite
May 2015
S M T W T F S
« Apr    
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930
31