Julian Sanchez

Say Hello To Our New Friends At Just Security

Screen shot 2013-09-23 at 11.46.58 AMWe do a lot of things here at Emptywheel including occasionally, goofing off. But our primary focus has always been the intersection of security issues, law and politics. I think I can speak for Marcy and Jim, and I certainly do for myself, we would love it if that intersection were not so critical in today’s world. But, alas, it is absolutely critical and, for all the voices out there in the community, there are precious few that deep dive into the critical minutiae.

Today we welcome a new and important player in the field, the Just Security Blog. It has a truly all star and broad lineup of contributors (most all of whom are listed as “editors” of one fashion or another), including good friends such as Steve Vladeck, Daphne Eviatar, Hina Shamsi, Julian Sanchez, Sarah Knuckey and many other quality voices. It is an ambitious project, but one that, if the content already posted on their first day is any indication, will be quite well done. The home of Just Security is the New York University School of Law, so they will have ample resources and foundation from which to operate for the long run.

Ironically, it was little more than three years ago (September 1, 2010 actually) that the Lawfare Blog went live to much anticipation (well, at least from me). Whether you always agree with Ben Wittes, Bobby Chesney, Jack Goldsmith and their contributors or not, and I don’t always, they have done this field of interest a true service with their work product, and are a fantastic and constantly evolving resource. There is little question but that Just Security intends to occupy much of the same space, albeit it in a complimentary as opposed to confrontational manner. In fact, it was Ben Wittes who hosted the podcast with Steve Vladeck and Ryan Goodman that serves as the multi-media christening of Just Security.

Orin Kerr (who is also a must read at Volokh conspiracy), somewhat tongue in cheek, tweeted that the cage match war was on between Lawfare and Just Security. That was pretty funny actually, but Orin made a more serious point in his welcome post today, and a point that I think will greatly interest the readers of Emptywheel:

Whereas Lawfare tend to have a center or center-right ideological orientation, for the most part, Just Security‘s editorial board suggests that it will have a progressive/liberal/civil libertarian voice.

From my understanding, and my knowledge of the people involved, I believe that to be very much the case. And that is a very good thing for us here, and the greater discussion on so much of our work.

So, say hello to our new friends at Just Security, bookmark them and give them a read. Follow them on Twitter. You will be better informed for having done so.

ECPA Amendments and Privacy in a Post Petraeus World

One of the issues making the rounds like wildfire today was a report from Declan McCullagh at CNET regarding certain proposed amendments to the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA). The article is entitled “Senate Bill Rewrite Lets Feds Read Your E-mail Without Warrants” and relates:

A Senate proposal touted as protecting Americans’ e-mail privacy has been quietly rewritten, giving government agencies more surveillance power than they possess under current law.

CNET has learned that Patrick Leahy, the influential Democratic chairman of the Senate Judiciary committee, has dramatically reshaped his legislation in response to law enforcement concerns. A vote on his bill, which now authorizes warrantless access to Americans’ e-mail, is scheduled for next week.

Leahy’s rewritten bill would allow more than 22 agencies — including the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Federal Communications Commission — to access Americans’ e-mail, Google Docs files, Facebook wall posts, and Twitter direct messages without a search warrant. It also would give the FBI and Homeland Security more authority, in some circumstances, to gain full access to Internet accounts without notifying either the owner or a judge. (CNET obtained the revised draft from a source involved in the negotiations with Leahy.)

This sounds like the predictably craven treachery that regularly comes out of Senate, indeed Congressional, legislation on privacy issues. And exactly what many had hoped would cease coming out of Washington after the public scrutiny brought on by the Petraeus/Broadwell/Kelley scandal. And, should these amendments make it into law, they may yet prove detrimental.

But there are a couple of problems here. First, as Julian Sanchez noted, those abilities by the government already substantially exist.

Lots of people RTing CNET’s story today seem outraged Congress might allow access to e-mail w/o warrant—but that’s the law ALREADY!

Well, yes. Secondly, and even more problematic, is Pat Leahy vehemently denies the CNET report. In fact, Senator Leahy does not support broad exemptions for warrantless searches for email content. A source within the Judiciary Committee described the situation as follows: Continue reading

Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz @Ali_Gharib @SangerNYT Think recall him saying should be more gradual than first indicated. I don't get the fainting vapors of warming tho
22sreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Brennan suggested Wyden shouldn't ask him about spying on Senate but CIA's actions fall w/in designated threats. https://t.co/whDKr2TL4P
48sreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @ryanlcooper Warmongers Central
1mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @SacconeSpeaks: ICYMI, #CIA head asserts “#separationofpowers … goes both ways” & allowed it to probe #SSCI files: https://t.co/Sr4B6q8R
2mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @JasonLeopold @vicenews The way this article bucks up and ratifies the undemocratic+corrupt superdelegate system is flat out gross.
3mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz With the 18 USC §924(c) deadly weapons enhancer, Cliven Bundy will be doing at least 7 yrs if convicted. https://t.co/SiLW9AB1BG
5mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @jeremyscahill @LincolnBrigade @lydiacachosi Sweet! Congrats to all.
9mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @byjoelanderson: Which is why I think it's a fool's errand to attempt to "bridge the divide." If you believe strongly in your ideas, jus…
15mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @Cujo359 @germanrlopez @vox Devastating to both defendants, defendants rights, courts and prison systems. Simply horrible.
17mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz No, he really does not. And giving a Pinocchio after establishing he doesn't, is lame and disingenuous. https://t.co/vBSOTa0VJk
19mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @kdrum I can't imagine there is one single practicing crim defense atty that has been around the whole time that would not scream at Lopez.
27mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @kdrum It is a healthy part as to why we still have such massive problems in both federal AND state level. Frankly the Vox piece is ignorant
29mreplyretweetfavorite
February 2016
S M T W T F S
« Jan    
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
2829