Lawrence Nicholson

Shorter Gen. Nicholson: “Yeah, We Lied Earlier About Afghan Troop Capabilities, But You Can Believe Us This Time”

It would appear that even the Washington Post is beginning to see through the way that the Defense Department continues to make outrageous claims regarding the capabilities of Afghan National Security Forces. An article published last night to the Post’s website carries the headline “Panetta, other U.S. officials in Kabul paint rosy picture of Afghan situation”. The article opens in conventional news-as-transcription-of-government-narrative fashion:

With Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta in Kabul to take stock as the Obama administration weighs how quickly to draw down troops over the next two years, a senior U.S. military commander on Wednesday hailed the progress Afghan security forces have made.

Marine Maj. Gen. Lawrence D. Nicholson, the head of operations for the U.S.-led coalition in Afghanistan, said NATO troops have begun a radical shift in mission: doing the bare minimum to support Afghan troops, who, he said, are starting to operate unilaterally. “We’re now un-partnering from” Afghan forces, Nicholson told reporters Wednesday evening. “We’re at that stage of the fight.”

The article then plants a hint, stating that if Afghan forces are seen as achieving capability to function on their own, the US withdrawal can be accelerated from the current plan of taking another two years.

Remarkably, the Post then moves on to provide some perspective for Nicholson’s claim:

The assessment Nicholson offered, however, is far rosier than the one that U.S. officials have provided recently. They have been citing the resilience of the Taliban and the shortcomings of the Afghan government and military.

Just one of 23 Afghan army brigades is able to operate on its own without air or other military support from the United States or NATO, according to a Pentagon report to Congress that was released Monday.

But Nicholson wants us to believe that even though the Defense Department has been lying for years about Afghan troop capabilities, they really, really mean it this time and we should believe them:

Nicholson said that although U.S. commanders have made “disingenuous” claims in the past about the extent to which Afghans were acting as equal partners in joint missions, officials now see the Afghan army as ready to operate largely on its own, albeit with key logistical and financial support from NATO. The new strategy as the United States tries to transfer greater responsibility to the Afghan government and military is one of “tough love,” Nicholson said.

Sadly, Nicholson’s claims appear to have no more credibility than previous DoD claims on ANSF capabilities. Consider this exchange from the briefing held Monday at the Defense Department, featuring as speakers Senior Defense Official “[Briefer name deleted]” and Senior State Department Official “[briefer name deleted]” where we see that the Post isn’t the only media operation that sees through the duplicity. This exchange starts with a question from Lita Baldor of AP [emphasis added]: →']);" class="more-link">Continue reading

Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel RT @gregorydjohnsen: 3/n the optics don't look great - a drone strike to show the US could and would still conduct strikes in Yemen
10mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @rj_gallagher @CIA 1) No one 2) Some contractor they deny a fair trial 3) The person that revealed it to press
12mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @mattblaze I think Jules Verne might even have envisioned it if word robot had been available. All the better bc it'd be in newspaper
14mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Alright. I'll admit it. Mitt DOES look nice w/Jeb's boot print on his fanny.
26mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Who produces a reality show where the most famous and loathed competitor drops out right at the beginning. Don't fuck up my Reality Show!!
30mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Really, the CIA is just one long TS Eliot poem and was that way long before Angleton ran the joint.
36mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel In honor of CIA's new NCS head, will rename this post, "In a wilderness of mirrors. What will the spider do," https://t.co/OCyCD1bMDm
36mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @sethdmichaels It's a long way to 2016.
47mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @sethdmichaels Sure. But Sandoval could actually beat the Democrats.
49mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel How come no one is starting Brian Sandoval rumors?
53mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel How long until we get the Big Scoop™ of the consultant explaining to Mitt he couldn't credibly be the candidate of wage inequality?
56mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Was thinking of starting a Twitter account called Dingell in Retirement but I can't outsnark this: https://t.co/Kph83CxgUG cc: @JohnDingell
59mreplyretweetfavorite
January 2015
S M T W T F S
« Dec    
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031