Lawrence Nicholson

Shorter Gen. Nicholson: “Yeah, We Lied Earlier About Afghan Troop Capabilities, But You Can Believe Us This Time”

It would appear that even the Washington Post is beginning to see through the way that the Defense Department continues to make outrageous claims regarding the capabilities of Afghan National Security Forces. An article published last night to the Post’s website carries the headline “Panetta, other U.S. officials in Kabul paint rosy picture of Afghan situation”. The article opens in conventional news-as-transcription-of-government-narrative fashion:

With Defense Secretary Leon E. Panetta in Kabul to take stock as the Obama administration weighs how quickly to draw down troops over the next two years, a senior U.S. military commander on Wednesday hailed the progress Afghan security forces have made.

Marine Maj. Gen. Lawrence D. Nicholson, the head of operations for the U.S.-led coalition in Afghanistan, said NATO troops have begun a radical shift in mission: doing the bare minimum to support Afghan troops, who, he said, are starting to operate unilaterally. “We’re now un-partnering from” Afghan forces, Nicholson told reporters Wednesday evening. “We’re at that stage of the fight.”

The article then plants a hint, stating that if Afghan forces are seen as achieving capability to function on their own, the US withdrawal can be accelerated from the current plan of taking another two years.

Remarkably, the Post then moves on to provide some perspective for Nicholson’s claim:

The assessment Nicholson offered, however, is far rosier than the one that U.S. officials have provided recently. They have been citing the resilience of the Taliban and the shortcomings of the Afghan government and military.

Just one of 23 Afghan army brigades is able to operate on its own without air or other military support from the United States or NATO, according to a Pentagon report to Congress that was released Monday.

But Nicholson wants us to believe that even though the Defense Department has been lying for years about Afghan troop capabilities, they really, really mean it this time and we should believe them:

Nicholson said that although U.S. commanders have made “disingenuous” claims in the past about the extent to which Afghans were acting as equal partners in joint missions, officials now see the Afghan army as ready to operate largely on its own, albeit with key logistical and financial support from NATO. The new strategy as the United States tries to transfer greater responsibility to the Afghan government and military is one of “tough love,” Nicholson said.

Sadly, Nicholson’s claims appear to have no more credibility than previous DoD claims on ANSF capabilities. Consider this exchange from the briefing held Monday at the Defense Department, featuring as speakers Senior Defense Official “[Briefer name deleted]” and Senior State Department Official “[briefer name deleted]” where we see that the Post isn’t the only media operation that sees through the duplicity. This exchange starts with a question from Lita Baldor of AP [emphasis added]: Continue reading

Emptywheel Twitterverse
JimWhiteGNV @emptywheel Wouldn't it be interesting if it turns out the ship has US arms headed to Yemen?
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Good thing Iran seized a cargo ship today rather than next week when US will have made it terrorism. Remarkable timing.
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @thegrugq This surely undercuts his cred w/Congress. If you're not sucking NSA's teat you must be a nobody. @mattblaze
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @thegrugq @mattblaze is the same guy who yesterday didn't know he could bill millions if he said "cyber" in NoVa.
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel BC O's embrace of "surveillance reform" is actually even MORE limited than his embrace of drone reform, but people are less skeptical.
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Now that folks are discovering what was clear 2 years ago: drone "reform" limited, maybe they can be skeptical abt Obama surveil "reform"?
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @OKnox That is the argument, yes. And yet the US is the one pushing the most bilats, no?
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @OKnox Sure. But does that mean WTO are not rules that were already written (largely by US)?
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @astepanovich @KevinBankston was somehow arguing JDs are better at footnotes than PhDs which seems odd to this PhD @mattblaze @kehldanielle
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @OKnox Don't we already have WTO? Did someone wipe away all those rules?
2hreplyretweetfavorite
April 2015
S M T W T F S
« Mar    
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930