OCA

Did CIA OCA Censor Another Court Transmission?

Back on January 28, the proceedings of the military commission attempting to try Khalid Sheik Mohammed and co-conspirators were interrupted when an unknown entity outside the courtroom muted the audio feed carried out of the courtroom. The presiding judge was enraged and has held hearings to get to the bottom of the event. As Carol Rosenberg reported on January 31:

“This is the last time that will happen,” the judge said Thursday. “No third party can unilaterally cut off the broadcast.”

/snip/

Pohl never once mentioned the CIA, the agency that controls information about what happened to alleged mastermind Mohammed, who agents waterboarded 183 times, and his four co-defendants. Instead, he referred to the “OCA” — short for the original classification authority — a generic term for any agency of the U.S. government that stamped a document or declared a program Top Secret.

“This is the last time that an OCA or any third party will be permitted to unilaterally decide if the broadcast should be suspended. The OCA, any OCA does not work for the commission and therefore has no independent decision-making authority on how these proceedings are to be conducted.”

Remarkably, the OCA censoring scandal has now spread to include the presence of hidden microphones the defense contends may have been used to eavesdrop on privileged attorney-client conversations, but I want to concentrate here on a remarkable coincidence where a second terrorism trial also was disrupted by a sudden, unexplained interruption in a transmission of the proceedings.

The current case centers on the nearly 80 year old, frail imam of South Florida’s oldest mosque, Hafiz Khan. He and a number of co-conspirators are accused of funneling money to the Pakistan Taliban:

One of Mr. Khan’s sons, Izhar Khan, 24, the imam of a mosque in Margate, Fla., sat near his father in the jury box. Both men appeared in court for the first time since their federal indictment was unsealed late last week. Neither man entered a plea.The indictment says the defendants conspired to provide material support to a conspiracy to murder, maim and kidnap people overseas, including planning to funnel at least $50,000 to the Pakistani Taliban.

The Pakistani Taliban, which the State Department has named a terrorist organization, took responsibility for a suicide attack in Pakistan on Friday that killed more than 80 cadets from a government paramilitary force.

Significant portions of the government’s case rest on recordings of intercepted phone calls:

According to the indictment, a tape-recorded phone conversation has Mr. Khan calling for an attack on the Pakistani Assembly similar to a suicide bombing of the Marriott Hotel in Islamabad, Pakistan, on Sept. 20, 2008.

Prosecutors say that in another phone conversation, Mr. Khan “declared his wish that God kill 50,000” American soldiers.

Khan’s defense team wanted testimony from a number of people in Pakistan, but they will not come to the US to testify in the Miami trail.  Several motions were submitted by the defense and the government on just how testimony could be obtained from these witnesses. The defense wanted to depose the witnesses in Pakistan via videoconferencing, but the government fought that request. The government embarrassed itself a few times in these filings, especially when it argued that the defense had not indicated what language would be used for the depositions and so the government might not have the proper translators present. Further, the government tried to argue that the defense had not adequately shown why the witnesses did not want to come to the US.

In ruling on these many motions (pdf), the judge cut through the government’s arguments very cleanly, noting that the government had recorded these very witnesses and cited them in its indictment, so the language they speak is known to the government. Further, the witnesses are co-conspirators in the indictment and so they fear arrest if they come to the US: Continue reading

Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz @barryeisler @jayrosen_nyu Here is the full glory of Fineman's timeline before the deletion: http://t.co/jfDhYHbwaE
16mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @ClaraJeffery nearly 30 years in and around criminal law seems to point clearly to the former.
48mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz .@JesselynRadack I don't see why. Evidence is that @paulabroadwell's own neurotic obsession with+invasion of Jill Kelley caused own downfall
52mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Paper, plastic or Ducey bag? http://t.co/tEWs7SPl2v Uh so theres an IndieGoGo to help make reusable Doug Douchebags https://t.co/2SnrMC0HAI
55mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @yeselson @sbagen @LemieuxLGM Either way, what an ugly deal. Frankly, Smith is unwatchable even were it not for his roaring misogyny.
1hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @michaelbkiefer @dbaich @azcentral Excellent. I knew Dale was deeply involved, but didn't know if going. Have fun and good luck.
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @dbaich @michaelbkiefer @azcentral Either of you guys going to O/A's?
3hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @banditelli @JoshuaHol The Smoke Vault "looks" awesome though!
3hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @radleybalko: Police union buys billboard to support cop with 200 pages of citizen complaints, and who shot 2 people in 10 days. http://…
3hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @normative: Ironically, untrue: Buzzfeed skipped WHDC & was covering actual news from Baltimore. https://t.co/UOqcWhZGBw
3hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @KenRoth: If Obama apologized each day for a civilian killed by a drone, it would take him three years. http://t.co/vToVP9ooTD http://t.…
3hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @jayrosen_nyu Well, I guess that is true. Fair enough.
3hreplyretweetfavorite
April 2015
S M T W T F S
« Mar    
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
2627282930