retaliatory drone strikes

More Evidence US Views Drone Strikes as Political Retaliation Tool

On the same day that the US and Pakistan formally signed the agreement reopening the NATO supply routes through Pakistan, a piece profiling the US-Pakistan relationship in the New York Times provides further evidence supporting the idea that the US sometimes uses drone strikes as a tool for political retaliation. The retaliatory strikes previously have been stepped up to almost one per day when a particular point is being emphasized.

The entire Declan Walsh and Eric Schmitt piece in today’s Times is worth reading, but I want to focus on the evidence they provide for drone strikes as retaliation. The piece focuses on the Haqqani network and how the perceived ties between them and Pakistan’s ISI complicate the US-Pakistan relationship. At one point in the article, the discussion moves to contingencies the US has considered about what the US would do if the Haqqani network manages to inflict a significant blow against US forces in Afghanistan:

But a new boldness from the Haqqanis that aims at mass American casualties, combined with simmering political tension, has reduced the room for ambiguity between the two countries. Inside the administration, it is a commonly held view that the United States is “one major attack” away from unilateral action against Pakistan — diplomatically or perhaps even militarily, one senior official said.

/snip/

American officials recently considered what that could mean. Days after the Salerno attack, the White House held a series of interagency meetings to weigh its options in the event of a major success by the Haqqanis against American troops.

/snip/

The meetings yielded a list of about 30 possible responses, according to a senior official who was briefed on the deliberations — everything from withdrawing the Islamabad ambassador, to a flurry of intensified drone attacks on Haqqani targets in Pakistan’s tribal belt, to American or Afghan commando raids on Haqqani hide-outs in the same area.

Gosh, “a flurry of intensified drone attacks” sounds very familiar. That is exactly what happened last May when Zardari’s visit to the NATO summit in Chicago did not produce the agreement for reopening the supply routes. Retaliatory strikes started almost immediately, with at least four strikes coming within a span of six days.

With the understanding that the US views drone strikes as a retaliation tool, we can watch this week’s visit to Washington by new ISI chief Lieutenant General Zaheer ul-Islam. Islam will visit with David Petraeus and others Wednesday through Friday of this week. Drones are expected to be on the agenda for the meetings:

Lieutenant General Zaheer ul-Islam, who was appointed in March, “will visit USA from 1st to 3rd August. This will be a service-to-service bilateral visit,” the statement said.

“He will meet his counterpart General David Petraeus, director CIA.”

The short statement gave no other details, but a senior Pakistani security official earlier told AFP that the pair would discuss counter-terror cooperation and intelligence sharing.

Islam would also demand an end to US drone attacks against the Taliban and al Qaeda, and again ask for the means for Pakistan to carry out the attacks instead, the security official said.

The US has made it clear multiple times that it will not give up on carrying out drone strikes and that it does not trust ISI enough to bring them closely into the loop when choosing targets or timing for strikes. It seems very likely to me that the US will carry out a strike within the first day or two after the meeting ends, just to send the message to the ISI that the meeting has changed nothing in how the US will operate. If the strike is as reckless as the one that killed a group of 40 who turned out to be mostly civilians on the day after the release of Raymond Davis, then the US could be accused of letting the need for political retaliation move it all the way to blind rage. Another hint in the Times piece tells us that Haqqani leader “Sirajuddin Haqqani surrounds himself with civilians — often women and children — at his base in the town of Miram Shah”. Will the US decide to allow some “collateral damage” to women and children in an attempt to take out Sirajuddin Haqqani as Islam returns to Pakistan from his meeting with Petraeus?

Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel RT @BlogWood: You Can Buy a Copy of Marx’s ‘Capital’ Signed by Carly Fiorina on eBay To Benefit Bernie https://t.co/g7rAqKVm0O https://t.co
6hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @Nick_Hentoff @davidminpdx ...truly, how he beat the crap out of his craven attackers. But that model is no longer worker.
7hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @Nick_Hentoff @davidminpdx Bill Clinton is a true conundrum. So deeply appreciate how he did some positive things, and so much appreciate...
7hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz This is special in several ways: https://t.co/n6auYxhRr7
7hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @csoghoian Are you a VIP? Maybe they only follow schlubs whose OpSec they want to ruin?
7hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @Nick_Hentoff @davidminpdx Do you two know each other?? You probably should.
7hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel How this co tracked 16,000 Iowa caucus-goers via their phones https://t.co/aVkdOPgGSA Using ad data to profile users by Dem or GOP caucus
7hreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV Damn, I miss Walkin' Lawton. He was gone FAR too soon. https://t.co/8tUWG3wxYN
8hreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV RT @NickdelaTorreGC: One week from today @GatorsBB will be back in action with Logan Shore on the mound. #Gators https://t.co/hUpHOp5YYe
9hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @kgosztola: UK govt considers opening supermax prison just for "Islamist terrorists"; in other words, a British Gitmo https://t.co/ijQC5
9hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @tedhartii: Alarming story from @the_intercept on how Missouri prisoners routinely had calls with lawyers recorded: https://t.co/glTIFrn
9hreplyretweetfavorite
February 2016
S M T W T F S
« Jan    
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
2829