Sen. Patrick Leahy

ECPA Amendments and Privacy in a Post Petraeus World

One of the issues making the rounds like wildfire today was a report from Declan McCullagh at CNET regarding certain proposed amendments to the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA). The article is entitled “Senate Bill Rewrite Lets Feds Read Your E-mail Without Warrants” and relates:

A Senate proposal touted as protecting Americans’ e-mail privacy has been quietly rewritten, giving government agencies more surveillance power than they possess under current law.

CNET has learned that Patrick Leahy, the influential Democratic chairman of the Senate Judiciary committee, has dramatically reshaped his legislation in response to law enforcement concerns. A vote on his bill, which now authorizes warrantless access to Americans’ e-mail, is scheduled for next week.

Leahy’s rewritten bill would allow more than 22 agencies — including the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Federal Communications Commission — to access Americans’ e-mail, Google Docs files, Facebook wall posts, and Twitter direct messages without a search warrant. It also would give the FBI and Homeland Security more authority, in some circumstances, to gain full access to Internet accounts without notifying either the owner or a judge. (CNET obtained the revised draft from a source involved in the negotiations with Leahy.)

This sounds like the predictably craven treachery that regularly comes out of Senate, indeed Congressional, legislation on privacy issues. And exactly what many had hoped would cease coming out of Washington after the public scrutiny brought on by the Petraeus/Broadwell/Kelley scandal. And, should these amendments make it into law, they may yet prove detrimental.

But there are a couple of problems here. First, as Julian Sanchez noted, those abilities by the government already substantially exist.

Lots of people RTing CNET’s story today seem outraged Congress might allow access to e-mail w/o warrant—but that’s the law ALREADY!

Well, yes. Secondly, and even more problematic, is Pat Leahy vehemently denies the CNET report. In fact, Senator Leahy does not support broad exemptions for warrantless searches for email content. A source within the Judiciary Committee described the situation as follows: Continue reading

Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz @IanPGunn Don't forget the critical input of Twitter Judge Berman.
46mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel That KY clerk makes Trump look like a piker in serial divorce. http://t.co/yMifR9Gezt
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel If the Mounties are charging people who torture Canadians will they do same for Omar Khadr?
1hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @WerlySportsLaw @WALLACHLEGAL @IanPGunn @amilst44 Jeebus I come out of ct to find all you guys have done is get a "Won't be an order" order?
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @ddayen: HUD basically going forward with plan to let Citi & JPM wiggle out of guilty pleas & continue FHA lending http://t.co/5GRiGcydjv
2hreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV @biasedreporter The inaccuracies in how IAEA does inspections.
2hreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV @biasedreporter Yeah, one minor correction while still allowing major errors to remain...
2hreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV And with all that hate in her actions, she's pretty much guaranteed hell. https://t.co/WE4bYwSpeD
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Reminder; changing the rules of the game is the 3rd stage of Trump grief. http://t.co/J3HAiONyhr
3hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @jamisonfoser Sure, but having worked harder she has skills that, say, Christie and Walker never had to develop.
3hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @onekade Cause Pelican Bay just changed the rules and they can't sell "hardest prison ever" by calling it Pelican Bay 2?
3hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel .@DanaHoule Rick Santorum: She used Affirmative Action to get my spot in the debate.
3hreplyretweetfavorite
September 2015
S M T W T F S
« Aug    
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
27282930