Sen. Patrick Leahy

ECPA Amendments and Privacy in a Post Petraeus World

One of the issues making the rounds like wildfire today was a report from Declan McCullagh at CNET regarding certain proposed amendments to the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA). The article is entitled “Senate Bill Rewrite Lets Feds Read Your E-mail Without Warrants” and relates:

A Senate proposal touted as protecting Americans’ e-mail privacy has been quietly rewritten, giving government agencies more surveillance power than they possess under current law.

CNET has learned that Patrick Leahy, the influential Democratic chairman of the Senate Judiciary committee, has dramatically reshaped his legislation in response to law enforcement concerns. A vote on his bill, which now authorizes warrantless access to Americans’ e-mail, is scheduled for next week.

Leahy’s rewritten bill would allow more than 22 agencies — including the Securities and Exchange Commission and the Federal Communications Commission — to access Americans’ e-mail, Google Docs files, Facebook wall posts, and Twitter direct messages without a search warrant. It also would give the FBI and Homeland Security more authority, in some circumstances, to gain full access to Internet accounts without notifying either the owner or a judge. (CNET obtained the revised draft from a source involved in the negotiations with Leahy.)

This sounds like the predictably craven treachery that regularly comes out of Senate, indeed Congressional, legislation on privacy issues. And exactly what many had hoped would cease coming out of Washington after the public scrutiny brought on by the Petraeus/Broadwell/Kelley scandal. And, should these amendments make it into law, they may yet prove detrimental.

But there are a couple of problems here. First, as Julian Sanchez noted, those abilities by the government already substantially exist.

Lots of people RTing CNET’s story today seem outraged Congress might allow access to e-mail w/o warrant—but that’s the law ALREADY!

Well, yes. Secondly, and even more problematic, is Pat Leahy vehemently denies the CNET report. In fact, Senator Leahy does not support broad exemptions for warrantless searches for email content. A source within the Judiciary Committee described the situation as follows: Continue reading

Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel RT @joshgerstein: DC Circuit issues rare mandamus order nixing deposition for Vilsack in Sherrod v. Breitbart lawsuit http://t.co/Pz1RjXFcw6
1mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @attackerman Don't forget surveill everyoneinthewideworldistan. In case they become Whereverthefuckistan.
5mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @onekade A really bad cover? Schindler, is that you?
22mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel "Debate abt capital punishment in US has now devolved into debating how many mins of wheezing & coughing = too many," http://t.co/edSoJShmIJ
37mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Greg Miller is better at the tie-less look than Bob Litt. #ImportantNatSecNews
53mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @JulieATate They lost ability to wiretap on parts of AQAP bc of Daily Beast story, then blamed it on Snowden. Maybe that? @KenDilanianAP
53mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Apparently Raj De did not prep by reading @bartongellman's analysis showing that you don't have to be communicating w/target to be collected
55mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel John Rizzo says 12333 has been on the books for years. Doesn't say Bush "amended" 12333 in 2001 but did not change text of EO until 2008.
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @MiekeEoyang He proposes to start doing that sometime after another 5 years of tenure?
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @MiekeEoyang Also, law requires purging info not related to Foreign Intell. Both PCLOB and WaPo analysis agree that almost never happens
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @SpyTalker: Army intelligence system pulled from key test - U.S. - Stripes http://t.co/ztjcU3esLv
1hreplyretweetfavorite
July 2014
S M T W T F S
« Jun    
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031