State Department Afghanistan travel warning

Acknowledgement of Failure in Afghanistan Spreads Throughout US Government

Mostly abandoned $7.3 million Border Police facility in Kunduz Province, Click on photo for a larger view.

After staying out of the headlines while the military carried out its panty-sniffing investigation of his emails, General John Allen is back in today’s Washington Post in the first of what will be many valedictories of his time as commander of US forces in Afghanistan. He is the 11th commander there since 2001, so a year seems to be about all anyone can stomach. But Allen’s reappearance comes at an inauspicious time, as two different documents released yesterday show that despite the continued “we won” attitude from Allen and his minions, many of the rest of the branches of the US government (h/t to Marcy for pointing me toward both these documents) now openly admit that we have failed there.

McClatchy’s Jonathan Landay tweeted Monday afternoon: “State Dept #Afghanistan travel warning: Afghan govt has “limited ability to maintain order and ensure security.” Did White House read this?” Following up on his tweet, the travel warning paints a bleak picture of the security situation in Afghanistan:

The Department of State warns U.S. citizens against travel to Afghanistan. The security threat to all U.S. citizens in Afghanistan remains critical.

/snip/

No region in Afghanistan should be considered immune from violence, and the potential exists throughout the country for hostile acts, either targeted or random, against U.S. and other Western nationals at any time. Remnants of the former Taliban regime and the al-Qaida terrorist network, as well as other groups hostile to International Security Assistance Force (ISAF) military operations, remain active.

The next sentence, though, is the most devastating and is what Landay referenced:

Afghan authorities have a limited ability to maintain order and ensure the security of Afghan citizens and foreign visitors.

As Landay asks, has the White House read this? After a long string of no longer operational explanations for why we are still in Afghanistan, the current line is that we must stay long enough to train and support the 352,000-strong Afghan National Security Force so that it can take responsibility for security as we withdraw. Although the Post article does note that the future for Afghanistan does not look good, when Allen is quoted, victory language returns, and it is in stark contrast to the State Department view of conditions:

With 11 days left in his tour, Allen says he’s proud of the growth of the Afghan security forces and the success of NATO’s troop surge in places such as southern Helmand, where four years ago the Taliban operated freely.

The State Department would appear to dispute that claim that the Taliban no longer operates freely in Helmand.

As if the State Department’s travel warning isn’t devastating enough to the Afghan war situation, a report released yesterday by the Special Inspector General for Afghanistan Reconstruction (SIGAR) (pdf) demonstrates that the claim that ANSF force size has achieved the 352,000 goal is a sham. The photos above depict a $7.3 million facility built by the US for Afghan Border Police in Kunduz Province. The findings of the report are devastating: →']);" class="more-link">Continue reading

Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz @armandodkos @ThePlumLineGS My guess is no, will be nearly entirely statutory discussion.
2mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz King v. Burwell: What will we learn from oral argument? http://t.co/4XuFrtLmZb Nice take by @armandodkos
3mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @ThePlumLineGS: Reposting my read on how Roberts and Kennedy could side with challengers, if they so choose: http://t.co/wmQ1CVcaBv
10mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @ggreenwald: FYI: The "Snowden to return if fair trial!!" stories are silly: he's been saying the same exact thing for 20 months http:/…
11mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @emptywheel: I'm happy for Hillary to pay price for dodging transparency, but ALL citizens have interest in fixing email retention for A…
13mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @emptywheel Also, didn't Obama have an issue with non-existent WH Tech Officers?
14mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @PhilPerspective Robert Kraft was also in attendance. He could make clapping like trained seals very lucrative for Dems too. @bmaz
15mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @emptywheel: On Hillary and email control, remember that White House control of emails didn't prevent a slew of emails from disappearing…
17mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @joshua_eaton Yes, he raised it.
18mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @emptywheel: Anyone yet get the details on the fundraiser(s) after Bibi's speech? Did Sheldon Adelson basically buy Bibi a session of Co…
19mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @jgarzik: @jackgillum @NoahShachtman Standard legal trick. I knew a paranoid techie whose email server resided in his attorney's office.
20mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @JohnWonderlich: years of a vacant inspector general position looks even worse when your email has been removed from public employees' r…
25mreplyretweetfavorite
March 2015
S M T W T F S
« Feb    
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031