violence

John Galt Kills Americans

The National Research Council and Institute of Medicine yesterday released the results of a study addressing mortality in the United States as compared to other developed nations. The full report can be purchased here, where a summary also can be downloaded as a free pdf file. The press release on the study frames the questions addressed:

On average, Americans die sooner and experience higher rates of disease and injury than people in other high-income countries, says a new report from the National Research Council and Institute of Medicine.  The report finds that this health disadvantage exists at all ages from birth to age 75 and that even advantaged Americans — those who have health insurance, college educations, higher incomes, and healthy behaviors — appear to be sicker than their peers in other rich nations.

“We were struck by the gravity of these findings,” said Steven H. Woolf, professor of family medicine at Virginia Commonwealth University in Richmond and chair of the panel that wrote the report.  “Americans are dying and suffering at rates that we know are unnecessary because people in other high-income countries are living longer lives and enjoying better health.  What concerns our panel is why, for decades, we have been slipping behind.”

From the summary, we have this long explanation of the causes of high US mortality, where I have added emphasis:

The panel’s inquiry found multiple likely explanations for the U.S. health disadvantage:

• Health systems. Unlike its peer countries, the United States has a relatively large uninsured population and more limited access to primary care. Americans are more likely to find their health care inaccessible or unaffordable and to report lapses in the quality and safety of care outside of hospitals.

• Health behaviors. Although Americans are currently less likely to smoke and may drink alcohol less heavily than people in peer countries, they consume the most calories per person, have higher rates of drug abuse, are less likely to use seat belts, are involved in more traffic accidents that involve alcohol, and are more likely to use firearms in acts of violence.

• Social and economic conditions. Although the income of Americans is higher on average than in other countries, the United States also has higher levels of poverty (especially child poverty) and income inequality and lower rates of social mobility. Other countries are outpacing the United States in the education of young people, which also affects health. And Americans benefit less from safety net programs that can buffer the negative health effects of poverty and other social disadvantages.

• Physical environments. U.S. communities and the built environment are more likely than those in peer countries to be designed around automobiles, and this may discourage physical activity and contribute to obesity.

No single factor can fully explain the U.S. health disadvantage. Deficiencies in the health care system may worsen illnesses and increase deaths from certain diseases, but they cannot explain the nation’s higher rates of traffic accidents or violence. Similarly, although individual behaviors are clearly important, they do not explain why Americans who do not smoke or are not overweight also appear to have higher rates of disease than similar groups in peer countries.

More likely, the U.S. health disadvantage has multiple causes and involves some combination of inadequate health care, unhealthy behaviors, adverse economic and social conditions, and environmental factors, as well as public policies and social values that shape those conditions.

What stands out to me is that the list of reasons Americans die early overlaps significantly with the social goals of right-wing libertarians who worship Ayn Rand and John Galt. Continue reading

Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel @drfarls Thank you for not getting glass on our (I assume, given the sun) beaches.
30mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Like they haven't been the epitome of petty and shallow already? Screw the self absorbed+shallow political press https://t.co/nSqxNM3EcW
38mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @teddysanfran: No one in America cares how the email-obsessed national press is treated except the email-obsessed national press. https:…
41mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @teddysanfran: Why "ridiculous"? Should national press be allowed to ruin a campaign event with their silly ?s about emails? https://t.…
42mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @MikeSacksEsq @fedcourts @JJGomez127 Wouldn't be all bad to have Watford replace Clarence Thomas! Not holding my breath, just saying....
1hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @MikeSacksEsq @fedcourts @JJGomez127 Pretty pathetic that nobody but Harvard/Yale products are eligible for a court serving entire nation.
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @MikeSacksEsq @fedcourts @JJGomez127 I think Nguyen is better choice+would lend some desperately needed diversity both academically+racially
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @MikeSacksEsq @fedcourts @JJGomez127 Pillard is common wisdom. But she is yet another lily white Ivy Leaguer. Time for something new.
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @JJGomez127: @bmaz Who do you think is Hillary's best option for SCOTUS if she wins? Pillard,Wilkins,Srinivasan,Watford,Friedland,Nguyen…
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @JJGomez127 The court could use some diversity in form of a western judge from a western school for once.
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @JJGomez127 Think you have the right list. All decent choices, except don't care for Sri much. Like to see either Watford or Nguyen.
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @BazNoir: I just published “BROKEN BUDDHISTS: NO ILLUSION, NO DISILLUSION” https://t.co/emcnwBgweJ #zen #buddhism #anger
3hreplyretweetfavorite
July 2015
S M T W T F S
« Jun    
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031