The Incredible Story of Mahdi Obeidi, Conclusion

Summary: In this series of posts, I examine somefunkiness regarding the story of Mahdi Obeidi, the Iraqi nuclearscientist who claimed to have buried a nuclear centrifuge under hisrose plant. In part one, I lay out a timeline for his story. Parts two and three examine some problems with the materials he turned over. Part four questions the stories Obeidi and Pitzer told about their meeting. Part five looks the WaPo articlethat is a central prop in Obeidi’s story. Part six examines some of the tensions within the intelligenceagencies dealing with Obeidi. This post summarizes the evidence presented in the other posts, then speculates on what may have actually happened.

Finally! My much-delayed conclusion to my series on Mahdi Obeidi. In this post, I’ll review everything I’ve presented before (note, I’m not putting links for stuff covered earlier–if you want a particular link, ask me for it in the comments), then provide two different speculative scenarios for what might really have happened. As I’ve been saying throughout this series, I don’t think I’ve disproven the story of Mahdi Obeidi. I think his story–as told–is possible. But I do think it improbable.

I speculate below that one of two things happened with the Obeidi story. I think it possible that Obeidi had something less spectacular to turn over, and that the CIA simply fluffed up the story to serve their needs. But I also think it possible that the the CIA contacted Obeidi during the war, encouraged him to defect, had him contact Pitzer as his first intelligence contact, then made up the centrifuge and blueprint story out of thin air. If either scenario were true, it would suggest one of the Bush Administration’s biggest pieces of proof of Saddam’s ongoing intent was completely made up. But before I flesh out these scenarios, let me lay out the evidence I’ve given so far.

  1. Anonymous says:

    You know, the more I think about it, the more I’m convincing myself that, if Pitzer is an operative of some kind, it’s for Rendon. They’ve got big offices in London (perhaps for just the reason I said, to skirt restrictions on journalist and intelligence).

  2. Anonymous says:

    great work ew.

    like you, i’m not quite convinced one way or other

    i presume it would be too much to hope for that there might be a link to Pamela Pitzer Willeford?

  3. Anonymous says:

    You mean Kurt Pitzer? I’ve been trying to figure that out. I can’t get much biographical stuff on Pitzer. Though I did discover that someone named Kurt Pitzer wrote for hunting guidebooks. Don’t know if it’s the same guy, though it would fit his adventurer MO.

  4. Anonymous says:

    To clarify further. A reader has done some research, and the Pitzers are not related apparently. Kurt is from CA, Pamela (obviously) is from TX. They just both like hunting and republican thuggery.

  5. lukery says:

    sorry EW – yeah, i meant kurt and pamela – i was mostly joking. i was trying to do some quick research into your rendon theory and pamela’s name cropped up.

  6. Anonymous says:

    Yeah, I was never pursuing it that seriously either. But I did find it weird that Kurt Pitzer’s name came up while I was googling Willeford’s hunting exploits the other day.

    Small world, even though there is no connection.