i think you may have you slipped on â€waxmanâ€.

there’s one waxman too many in the last paragraph.

thanks for the info: i’ve been wondering what actually happened with the ralston deposition.

and i’m also wondering who is going to be the alexander butterfield (or some such), of this mammoth scandal,

the person who gives the whole game away.

iglesias says the sweet little m&m girl might be the one.

i guess we’ll test this hypothesis tomorrow.

EW – Why do you think Waxman is holding out on giving immunity to Ralston?

My thought is that could be getting good data from other people that will put her in a much tighter spot, thus when it comes time to negotiate with her, she’ll be much more eager to walk the dog (rover) than to play firewall.

I don’t know seem odd to me. I can’t imagine that he has information enough from others as to make her moot.

Yes, Lone Ranger. Seem odd to me too.
geez

So it goes back to someone’s comment â€I like my stoolies under indictmentâ€

Thus, your gut feeling is that they are closing on her in a very tanigible way. It that’s so, it’s going to be one hell of a bomb when Wax sets it off.

Sometimes I get the feeling that we are watching one big dog and pony show where both sides are players that know their parts. From where we are now if we don’t get some real heads on the platter I fear I’ll look at Washington with about the same disdane as WWF.

The conundrum for the paleocons/sons of watergate is the cost benefit analysis/risk assessment of firewall defense versus the election cycle. The emerging chess game of constitutional rules and legal time should enthrall all of us because the sensibilities of the Founders were incredibly accurate. The scoundrals are always with us and the only hope is to have institutions and structure that keep them at bay.
Ms. Ralston and Ms. Goodling serve as prime examples of innocence gone awry. Neocon fodder for the cause. I don’t think there will be a Alexander Butterfield, but rather a cascading effect of culminating behavior that Christ might more readily identify with the Sadducees and Pharisees than his disciples.

the person who gives the whole game away.

please, â€the personâ€, step forward … people are dying here

3.1415926535897932384626433

Sorry couldn’t stop myself.

This is an incredibly bizarre Kabuki dance Berenson is laying down on/off the record as cited by Waxman in the May 22,2007 Memorandum. I am curious if it comes across the same way in the cold transcript as it does in Waxman’s Memo. Who is the â€Majority Counsel†referred to in the Memorandum that conducted the deposition of Ralston for the Committee? There is some agreement or understanding between Berenson and either Waxman or, alternatively, the majority Counsel on Waxman’s behalf, that we are not seeing here.

great stuff, EW! –

it seems that rep. henry waxman
(or â€his peopleâ€!) read your
fine blog, EW — well-after midnight
last night the ACTUAL WAXMAN MEMO
text was UPDATED, with a shiny new
paragraph that makes what you said
just as clear as day — IN THE END
OF THE REVISED MEMO.

yep — i’ve marked it all, on mine.

great job, EW!

imo, unlike ms. goodling — there should
be no quick move toward immunity for
ms. ralston. as waxman’s revised memo
indicates — let’s subpoena karl rove,
among others, FIRST!

promote enneagon stratic palaeophytic embankment sclerodermic dermatotherapy veadar
5
http://www.angelfire.com/ahfohm/7.html
6
http://www.freewebs.com/ielohv/11.html
14
http://www.freewebs.com/ielohv/13.html
17
http://www.angelfire.com/ahfohm/3.html
18
http://www.freewebs.com/ielohv/12.html
2
http://www.angelfire.com/ahfohm/9.html
15
http://www.angelfire.com/ahfohm/4.html
10
http://www.freewebs.com/ielohv/16.html
8
http://www.angelfire.com/ahfohm/1.html
14
http://www.freewebs.com/ielohv/16.html

promote enneagon stratic palaeophytic embankment sclerodermic dermatotherapy veadar
Testicular Implants
http://eskldeuv.info/146.html