Joe Chooses His New Friend, Karl Rove, Over the Rule of Law

image_print
  1. Canuck Stuck in Muck says:

    Hear, hear!
    There’s no way that this leaverman should be allowed in the Dem caucus. No way!
    Go get ’im, Edub!

  2. KdmFromPhila says:

    If we ditch him, then don’t the Republicans become the majority party in the Senate? The thought of Mitch McConnell as Senate Majority leader is frightening.

  3. Ishmael says:

    I had originally thought the â€no confidence†vote to be a dry run for impeachment proceedings. I’ll give Senator Schumer the benefit of the doubt for now and that there is a plan in place. Does the failure of the cloture vote indicate that AGAG is home free until Bush goes? Or does Speaker Pelosi now begin impeachment proceedings, with the understanding that Schumer has lots of stuff that will make it very difficult for the Senate Republicans not to vote in the required numbers? Or will the impeachment proceedings be stayed in return for something, like appointment of a special prosecutor? One thing about the Rethugs, they certainly know how to keep all their pawns in place in this chess game.

  4. Seamus says:

    Lieberman is firmly in Rove’s pocket, and a closer neo-con, to boot. Rove got him the money to campaign as an â€independentâ€. He spends a lot of time, and appears to think his allegiance is to Israel, judging by his foreign policy statements, & not to the USA. Netanyahu is his mentor, in my opinion. His serial comments on attacking Iran are most certainly not in America’s best interests, but are very popular in Tel Aviv.

  5. Neil says:

    EW,Thank you for the lowdown on the cloture vote. I want to hear the Senator’s who voted â€No†on cluture explain the reasons thay have confidence in Gonzalez as AG. I wonder how many would cite the lack of evidence of illegal activity. I’m struck by the low bar… in the shins.

  6. TeddySanFran says:

    Bought and paid for, with Mel Sembler’s money and the post-primary phone call from Karl: â€Let us know if there’s anything we can do to help, Joe!â€

  7. TeddySanFran says:

    Not one GOP would defend AbuG on the floor of the Senate today, choosing instead to slime Schumer for being political (!) and calling the vote political grandstanding and of no consequence. Also, Hutchinson thought they had better things to do. Ha-ha, KayB, you funny lady.

  8. Anonymous says:

    Neil,

    Only Hatch will say he has confidence in AGAG at this point, only Hatch.

    So none of them would state their opinion as favorable to AGAG. Rather, they’re taking cover in the fact that they don’t want to have â€question time†for George Bush. (Because god forbid Bush have to answer any questions, you know).

  9. viget says:

    Kick him out, I say.

    Regarding Kdmfrom Phila’s comment, my understanding is that the organizing resolutions have already been passed for this session, and that even if the balance of power switches, there is no way the repubs can become the majority party because any attempt to pass new organizing resolutions would be subject to cloture, which the repubs don’t have the votes for.

    That being said, I just heard a story on NPR this afternoon opining that if Sen. Johnson from SD hadn’t recovered, the Senate would switch to GOP hands because the Republican SD governor would have appointed a repub, making the senate 50-50 with Darth as the tiebreaker. Someone needs to correct NPR on this point.

    I assume I have all this right, where’s Kagro X to weigh in?

  10. Woodhall Hollow says:

    Not that I enjoy being redundant, but I have to say it one more time:

    FUCK JOE LIEBERMAN!

    (& btw – I don’t think he works for KKKarl Rove. Rather I think he really works for Sharon Netanyahu.) I have a well connected sister-in-law who teaches piano in a number of well apportioned CT yeshivas in CT who has told me so. Not that it would be rocket science to figure it out–what is rocket science is to figure out why it is so difficult (or sacrilege to say) to figure this out.

  11. orionATL says:

    lieberman just got elected for six more years.

    coleman is up for re-election next year, as i believe are collins, sunnu, and smith, maybe snowe.

    that’s the only difference.

    if liberman’s election were this year he would have voted with the democrats.

    the time to get liberman was last year. it’s too late now; he’d escaped.

    in general, lieberman’s voting positions this year seem almost to be personal ones in which he is saying â€go to hell†to the democratic party.

    as for who votes for what when, it’s not necessarily the money you want to follow, but the political power.

    same applies to bush vis-a-vis abu gonzales or iraq.

  12. Rick says:

    The Democrats should take his unused commitee chair away from him and re-assign it to a Democrat….Or maybe Reid should trade Joe for Hagle….someone who actually has principles.

    Woodhall Hollow….You are so correct…Joe’s true allegiance is too his religion/Israel. He is not a loyal American, just like all the other Neo-Cons traitors.

  13. Dismayed says:

    Nice rant, Janice. Suprisingly easy to get every word.

    Hey all, What about Obama? He didn’t vote. And here I was ready to donate to his campaign. Just threw out the envelope. Edwards just became my favorite.

  14. Anonymous says:

    Orion

    No, Snowe gets credit for this vote, she’s not up for reelection (just Collins from ME). Same with Specter, though you can be sure he would have voted Scottish Haggis had the vote mattered.

  15. Joe Klein’s conscience says:

    KdmFromPhila,
    Why would McConnell want to be Majority Leader right now? He probably has more fun watching Reid make an ass out of himself(ie: HoJo).

  16. Anonymous says:

    Canuck Stuck in Muck: Nope, the rules of the senate are set at the beginning of the session: there would only be a change in the rules (including committee proportions, majority leader, etc) if there were 60 votes to change them; or after the next general election.

    I say throw the bum out. Let the ass (Lieberman) lie down with the ass (McConnell) and not with the lambs.

    N.

  17. Dismayed says:

    I just thought of an argument applicable to this entire debacle. Isn’t calling this â€no conf†vote partisan in itself an admission that AGAG is a partisan. The AG is supposed to be non partisan, thus a vote on confidence is by nature a non partisan vote. Anyone who calls it a partisan witch hunt is in fact admitting that Abu is a partisan. They are proving the point. Just throwing it out there.

  18. Mimikatz says:

    The Senate is organized, and unlike in 2001, there is no provision for a revote before Jan 2009. The Dems hold the majority leader position and the committee chairs regardless of what happens, unless the Senate disregards 200 years of tradition that says that they are a continuing body that adopts rules at the beginning of each session and doesn’t change them midstream. This is the crux of the nuclear option, too, which one would think is now off the table since the GOP is staring at several years in the minority.

    Lieberman should be stripped of his committee chairmanship since he is doing nothing, nothing at all with it. It is the counterpart to Waxman’s committee in many respects and Joe is just warming the chair.

    I do think the Dems will wait for a few more shoes to drop, wait for some indictments, maybe referrals of some of the DOJ cronies for lying, some more resignations and testimony from some more fired and resigned folks with integrity, a few more court decisions repudiating Bush’s legal positions and after a few of each, do the vote again. Just like Iraq, make them vote for their masters over and over and hang them with it in Nov 2008.

    They should

  19. P J Evans says:

    I don’t think Joe’s loyalty is to Judaism. I think he’d choose Israel over his synagogue, if it came to a choice. (I know at least one Jew whose contempt for JoeL is great.)

    I say throw the bum out and see how long he bounces! (And while we’re at it, tell Harry Reid ’no more speeches in Congress, ever!’

  20. DeeLoralei in Memphis says:

    Cut him loose, please God. Give his chairmanship to someone who actually wants to look in to Katrina. He has done nothing for the Dems since they took over, except to vote for Reid . This should not require a bit of thought. He has much more power as the Independant who might switch partys than he is as one of 51 Dems or he would have as one of 50 Reps. He knows his power lies in this construct. Selfish power hungry bast**d.

  21. Anonymous says:

    Mimikats and DeeLoralei – I don’t know if, in fact, this is true; but I read somewhere back in late January or early February that the organizing resolution Mimi refers to (and she is definitely right about about the leader and committee percentages) also specifically names the committee chairs. If this is true, then it would not permit Schmoe Lieberman to be removed from his committee chairmanship. Does anyone else know the answer to this?

  22. Anonymous says:

    How do you ’Kick out’ a guy who’s already abandoned the hearth? His ’bomb Iran’ talk is consistent with his neocon/likudnikism. But I think he broke new ground supporting an AG damned for corruption of justice and election-tampering faux-investigations.

    In that regard, one hopes the MSM punditry would question him sharply since the AG’s clear role is to turn Justice into a GOP election dirty tricks machine against the party he caucuses with.

    (Yes, I know the MSM is also hopeless, but maybe someone can stick a bug in KO’s ear to rant about Pro-corruption Joe.)

  23. anwaya says:

    Just watched the RGJoe vote at C&L: I think it was Schumer and DiFi at the last minute on his shoulder, moving away together. With DiFi’s anger at the firing of Carole Lam, I’d say she had an interest in that vote.

  24. orionATL says:

    thanks e’wheel

    i wasn’t sure and didn’t want to take the time to check.

  25. TeddySanFran says:

    I wonder if RGJoe has a conflict. Isn’t the Connecticut USAtty, who’d investigate illegalities like slush funds in a USSenate election, serving at AbuG’s right hand right now? Perhaps there’s a reason why RGJoe voted in favor of AbuG continuing to serve. Besides the regular assaholic reason.

  26. phred says:

    PJ — just want to second your thoughts on Reid’s speech. How on earth did someone so inarticulate become Majority Leader? For that matter, how did he get elected? The man sounded like he could just barely string his sentences together. Honestly, after Whitehouse’s passionate and articulate presentation of the facts, Reid’s meandering mumbling was embarrassing. No wonder he can’t lay down the law with Lieberman (or Biden or Dodd or Obama), he probably can’t manage to convey to them that there is one.

  27. dotsright says:

    Liberman’s hypocracy knows no bounds. After his awful speech condemning Bill Clinton he has the nerve to side with Alberto Gonzalez.

    If that doesn’t say something about the man from Connecticut.

  28. Anonymous says:

    TeddySanFran

    Yes, I was wondering that myself. Kevin O’Connor, the guy who didn’t look into Holy Joe’s slush fund, not serving as COS to AGAG.

  29. orionATL says:

    may i suggest this thought to my fellow commenters here:

    when you have a one vote majority,

    and that one vote is recovering from a severe brain injury,

    that is not the time to act on righteous indignation,

    even if it IS righteous.

    the democrats are increasingly being portrayed as not keeping their word (re 2006 elections).

    that’s not accurate.

    democratic leaders are working their asses off to do the best they can.

    IMO nancy pelosi has been a remarkable leader. i’d love to see her as the first woman president.

    harry reid has done a number of â€courageous†thing, including today’s vote on abu g. and letting the feingold option on iraq come up for vote.

    each time he has lost.

    that takes guts and courage to do.

    remember, for congressional leaders, the first job requirement is to be able to count the votes, a priori.

    reid can count.

    (by contrast, knowing ahead you’re almost likely to score five touchdowns on your opponents does not count as courage, in my book).

    there’ll come a time to deal with lieberman, but it ain’t now.

    he already knows he’s a dead duck in the future, that’s why he’s behaving like he is; he no longer cares.

    from my perspective, that says a lot about his character.

    but then i’ve despised the bastard since he piously attacked clinton on the senate floor in 1998.

    i love al gore, but my wife can attest that when gore picked lieberman, i counted that a mark against his (gore’s) good judgment.

    and i still do.

    joe lieberman, the bassett hound of the senate.

  30. wethornet says:

    i have only just seen kkkarl rove referred to this way. love it! and joe owed kkkarl bigtime for help in election 06.

    why didn’t harry reid make the rethugs actually filibuster? actually go thru the grueling process of an actual filibuster. senate rule 22. make the bastards defend this p.o.s. draw the media spotlight to them. urggg.

    i would also bring this up once a month and tell them your are going to bring up this vote once a month until abu al is gone. one of my sayings and principles is: make the f*ckers play defense.

    i would also bring up a monthly vote on iraq.

    suggested sayings for 08. can start using ’em now. it’s the rule of law, stupid! it’s treason, stupid! it’s the constitution, stupid! (i am sure there are others.)

    btw, as i understand it, the senate voted in jan. that regardless of what happened, deaths, switching parties, etc, the dems have control. (don’t know if this applies to all cmte. chairs must stay the same. ie, joe must stay as chair.)

    and they wonder why the base is disspirited. (seems to be, â€it’s not a bug, it’s a design feature.â€)

  31. wethornet says:

    re: it’s the treason, stupid! ew, i don’t know if you are already using this quote but i would use ghwb’s â€it’s the most insidious form of treason†frequently.

  32. michael72 says:

    kick lieberman out of the party

    and start the impeachment hearings for Abu gonzales within the week.

    what are these democrats waiting for????

  33. Andrew says:

    Joe Lieberman is a wholly owned subsidiary of the White House.

    He was elected by Republican voters in Connecticut, and sold what was left of his political soul to make the deal. He has a personal apologia for his behavior, but (like many people) it has little to do with principle – it’s about him.

    After 2009, he will switch to the Republican caucus either way – with a larger Democratic majority after his committee chair is removed, or to more properly align himself with the majority.

    For now, he’s useful to Republicans as a â€bipartisan†voice, and to Democrats as a nominal member of their caucus. I don’t actually think he’s held in high esteem by either party.

  34. jumpy says:

    Dems need to keep him for now. Their majority is razor thin. There’s more at stake here.

    Yes Liebermann is a piece of trash. Yes he’s the lowest of the low. Yes he’s doing great damage to our country. His reputation and legacy will be one of betrayal and war-mongering. But right now he’s a necessary evil. There are other committee chairs and other issues we moderates and liberals need to stay in control of. Remember we’re fighting against radical rightwing zealots in control of the Republican party. There’s plenty at stake.

    If you are truly disgusted by Liebermann, and live in a state with a Republican Senator, GET TO WORK ON DEFEATING THAT SENATOR.

    Turn Joe Liebermann’s craven behaviour into more moderate and liberal gains in 2008. Get a moderate, liberal or progressive of any type into the Senate, in place of that Republican.

    Make the neoconservative movement pay for the betrayals of Joe Liebermann.

  35. Sara says:

    I suspect Norm Coleman’s yes vote can be much more ascribed to his big money Minnesota Financial Supporters than to anything to do with Rove. You have to remember that a very small clique of Republicans have long been the fund raisers and source of funds, and at the center of that clique is the Heffelfinger Family.

    By the way, Tom Heffelfinger now has a new client. He’s announced he will raise the defense fund and participate in the legal defense for General Pao. (WHO HE??) Pao is the Hmong General who splits his time between California and Minnesota’s Hmong community, and was recently indicted by DOJ for trying to buy machine guns, missels, rockets, other stuff, so as to start a revolution in Laos. The indictment is based on Patriot Act provisions. I find Heffelfinger’s choice of arms for and place of combat very much of interest here. (The Hmong were CIA clients during the secret war in Laos, and most migrated to Minnesota.) As they got their citizenship, most became DFL’ers — one of Pao’s neices is in her second term in the State Senate. Anyhow, I find TF’s decision to work on defense of Pao against Patriot Act type charges of some interest.

  36. Anonymous says:

    Sara – That is kind of interesting. What is the general perception there of the Hmong and did the messy shooting incident a few years back have a permanent impact on it? How do you think this will affect perceptions of Heffelfinger, if at all?

  37. Jodi says:

    I find all the comments and compaints about Joe Liebermann abandoning the Democrats and in particular the Liberal Causes very strange.

    I thought it was the Democrats and the Liberals that abandoned him this past election.

  38. low-tech cyclist says:

    OrionATL, jumpy, etc. – read what Mimikatz and others have posted. The Dems run the Senate for the next 19 months, regardless of what Lieberman does. All he can do is vote the GOP way on individual bills – and he’s already doing that. So kick the bastard out of the caucus.

    This completely kicks the props out of any residual BS about how â€Joe is whacked on Iraq, but other than that he’s a true blue Democrat.†Other than sheer partisanship, what reason was there to block a no-confidence vote on Gonzo? None. Lieberman’s a partisan – for the other party. End of argument.

    I’d also like to ask, where were the GOP’s â€principled conservatives†on this? John Warner voted to block the no-confidence vote. So did Pete Domenici. Ditto Huckleberry Graham. Can’t forget Richard Lugar, Lamar! Alexander, and Liddy Dole.

    But never fear – I’m sure Old Broder will call them out for their partisanship in defending a dishonest, incompetent, blatantly partisan Attorney General. In some very remote alternate universe, maybe.

  39. Sara says:

    bmaz — the shooting was in Wisconsin, a St. Paul Resident Hmong was found guilty. It got fairly normal coverage in the cities, but I don’t think it changed perceptions all that much. Apparently the Wisconsin Prison System has had to put him in their mental unit — and I think many people assumed that was the problem.

    Given the huge cultural differences the Hmong faced with migration, I think they have made a reasonable adjustment. Realize they had no written language on arrival — the U of Minnesota created a Hmong alphabet and dictionary for them — the younger generation seems to be doing reasonably well — using the community colleges and University to great advantage. Many problems get solved when you graduate and get hired your first group of Hmong Cops, which happened a few years back. They’ve done well in the Grocery business and the Restaurant trade, and have added true riches to the Farmer’s Markets. (Churches leased some land, and they went nuts growing Veggies.) But there are always residual problems — Hmong Culture apparently involves Fathers making marriage contracts for daughters, and then brides are â€kidnapped†— mostly it is just a form, but sometimes it is against the woman’s choice, and then US law kicks in, and Criminal Charges come into play. In the early years this was fairly common — less so now that the 2nd generation has become cops and social workers and can mediate when necessary. Apparently last year and this the graduating Medical School Class has the first Hmong Doctors, most of whom were born here — that should address some of the health issues for older members of the community, many of whom have minimal english. A few years back there was a so called â€asian Gang Problem†— I think it was about drugs mostly, but that has apparently diminished. I don’t know what to make of the Pao indictment, but with Heffelfinger deciding to take up the defense, perhaps it is not precisely as reported. (I really don’t see TH taking up bad or hopeless causes.)

    For some reason, the State Department over the last couple of Decades has selected Minnesota and Wisconsin as a destination for refugee migrants of extremely different Cultures. We got the Hmong, and more recently the Somali. (Someone at state must think we are or were far too homogenius). So while there are and have been problems — the migrant institutional structure is healthy, and many of the second generation seem to do fine and prosper.

    When Paul Wellstone died, the decision was made to totally rebuild one of the old Settlement Houses in St. Paul founded by Russian Jewish migrants in the 1890’s as his memorial, and just this year the new buildings opened. The Senate sent a lovely memorial — 10 million dollars actually — making for a true state of the art facility offering classes in everything, social services, health, mental health, huge support for community clubs and organizations, sports, arts, just a huge support system. When you have the resources to do that kind of support, you can do lots of things right. Before he died, Paul had promised to help Neighborhood House raise the money for their new building — too bad it had to be done this way. It is actually telling and funny — the first bill the Senate passed in 2002 right after the plane crash, the appropriation was for 10 million, but Bush did a put-down and cut off one million. Last fall when the Democrats re-took the Senate, in the lame duck session, they got real busy and found the money that had been cut, and hooked it on to a must pass bill. Typical.

  40. pseudonymous in nc says:

    Even with the crossover votes from GOP Senators facing tight elections, the absentees (Dodd, Obama, Biden) meant the 60 votes to proceed weren’t there. Which makes Lieberman’s no-vote a very deliberate fuck-you to the caucus. He’s taking the Zell Miller role, and as such is only valuable when he’s sticking out like a sore thumb. Well, fuck him. Let him caucus with the GOPpers, where he damn well belongs.

    And it’s time for Reid to establish the narrative of the obstructionist GOP minority in the Senate, petulantly pulling procedural bullshit to reject the will of the voters.

  41. Anonymous says:

    Sara – Thank you. That is a better answer than I could have envisioned really; all things considered it sounds like the Hmong are doing ok. We had a group of â€Lost Boys†from the Sudan here in a suburb of Phoenix. They were doing pretty well until some boneheaded regulation out of Bush after 9/11 impacted them and it kind of fell apart. For the life of me, I can’t rmember what the exact facts were, but there were a lot of people saddened. Thanks again.

  42. Kevin says:

    Good Ole Joe. You can trust him to stab the â€people†in the back. Wish he would convert to Republican status already. It is painful to watch all the liars in Washington!!!

  43. orionATL says:

    thanks sara,

    not only a historian but an anthropologist to boot.

    and a pleasure to read in either role.

  44. orionATL says:

    mimikatz at 20:56

    thanks for the explanation.

    i didn’t know that, based on precedent, the senate could not change its make-up until the next session of congress.

  45. orionATL says:

    arianna huffington really cuts loose against â€democratic dinosaurs†today

    and shares sentiments with many frustrated and angry commenters here.

    fun to read.