No

noright.thumbnail.jpg

CR has posted the "bailout plan," as it currently stands.

Glenn Greenwald has an important response, as does gjohnsit over at DKos.

But here’s all you need to know. Hank Paulson is asking for $700,000,000,000. That’s $2,333 from every man, woman, and child in the United States.

In exchange for that money, Paulson is unwilling to accept any demands to make markets more transparent, limit executive compensation, or assist homeowners fighting foreclosure. The sole purpose of that $700,000,000,000 is to bail out Wall Street and only Wall Street, but not to fix it, or our larger economy.

He is asking to be absolutely unbound by any law when he spends that money.

Decisions by the Secretary pursuant to the authority of this Act are non-reviewable and committed to agency discretion, and may not be reviewed by any court of law or any administrative agency.

The only "string" attached is a semi-annual Congressional report–one in which they would have zero leverage to influence his choices. 

 Within three months of the first exercise of the authority granted in section 2(a), and semiannually thereafter, the Secretary shall report to the Committees on the Budget, Financial Services, and Ways and Means of the House of Representatives and the Committees on the Budget, Finance, and Banking, Housing, and Urban Affairs of the Senate with respect to the authorities exercised under this Act and the considerations required by section 3.

Paulson didn’t even have the class to call this a "review"–which underscores the degree to which he wants to be unbound by any and all review, legal, congressional, or anything else. 

Hank Paulson–one of the CEOs who got us into this mess–is asking each and every American to give him $2,333 to do with as he sees fit, with absolutely no strings attached.

No. 

No Right Turn photo by greefus groinks

image_print
  1. NelsonAlgren says:

    No!!! is exactly right. We have to start calling Monday. The American taxpayer deserves to know more about this before, if ever, it is approved. No more free giveaways to Hank Paulson and his cronies on Wall Street.

  2. nomolos says:

    For that same $2333.00 we could give a person struggling to pay their debts about $200.00 a month.

    This is absolute bullshit from these people. Why the hell would I be willing to give one of the architects of this bloody mess almost a trillion dollars with no strings. Bushco are laughing all the way to the bank.

  3. perris says:

    He is asking to be absolutely unbound by any law when he spends that money.

    it is the shock doctrine, without a doubt

    • perris says:

      their entire purpose was to pillage the middle class, to take our assets and redistribute them to the wealthiest people on the planet

      wby?

      not to give them assets but to take them from us so their is a greater devide, they are robber barons and all they want is a rober baron economy

      • behindthefall says:

        It’s called a feudal system, overseen by an absolute monarch. It has a very long, very old pedigree. Exactly why these clowns should be so nostalgic for it is beyond me, because it probably has been responsible for more suffering, deprivation, and misery than any other long-lasting system devised.

        You’d have to be truly evil to want the return of that kind of “government”. Oh. Wait.

        The last Republican I liked said, ” … and that Government of the People, by the People, and for the People shall not perish from the Earth”. These “people” never did like that line.

        (Ever had one of those times when a correctly-spelled word just looks, um, wrong? Well, “people” is a very strange word, when you think about it. -e-o- ? Where’s that from?)

  4. Teddy Partridge says:

    Speaker Pelosi, don’t get fooled again!

    Patriot Act, FISA, AUMF, PAA, FAA — all these have been rammed at Congress when you are busy trying to go on vacation or get re-elected. Don’t be fooled by this “bailout” — it’s Shock Doctrine pure and simple. If you fall for this foolishness, you and Barack Obama will have your hands completely tied. Nothing will be accomplished for the next four years except paying this bill.

    Whatever happened to Pay/Go, anyway? Make Uncle Hank find a revenue stream for this sweet deal for his friends (and himself). Don’t pass this onto the next President!

    Do your job!

  5. plunger says:

    “Until this week,” notes the Financial Times, “it would have been unthinkable for the Federal Reserve to bail out an insurance company….”

    Actually, this was never “unthinkable” at all. Current FED Commissar Ben Bernanke has actually gone on record touting the Central Bank’s ability to exnihilate what it’s pleased to call “money” in any quantity its supervisors deem necessary in order to buy up anything it desires. And as I predicted almost exactly three years ago, the collapse of the debt bubble has left the FED and its controlling oligarchy in a position to conduct the “big buy-out” – the nationalization of practically everything in the supposed effort to prevent a depression.

    “There’s no limit to what the Fed is prepared to do,” points out investment analyst Richard Daughty, the widely quoted “Mogambo Guru.” “The only tool it has is inflation – creating money out of nothing. And Bernanke has explicitly stated that the Fed has the statutory means to use the money it creates to buy anything and everything, including stocks, bonds, houses, and raw land. It’s entirely possible that someday we’ll see the banking cartel literally owning everything – and Americans are letting this happen.”

    http://news.goldseek.com/LewRo…..020175.php

  6. Arbusto says:

    Some changes in the law and corporate governance could have prevented the current financial crisis. First, reverse the 19th Century Supreme Court ruling to treat Corporations as citizens and remove the corporate veil from Officers. This change would fundamentally change the mindset of Directors and Officers to act more responsibly and within the law. Remove the cozy relations between Directors/CEO’s on multiple boards. Make Corporations responsible to their customers first and profits and shareholders second. Remove the incentive of CEO’s for tactical leadership to strategic leadership, as in other parts of the Corporate world.

    Given the ethical and intellectual shallowness of the 110th Congress, don’t expect these bailouts well thought out or in the best interests of the citizenry!

  7. plunger says:

    From the article I posted above:

    “there’s no reason for the banksters to quit until they own everything or the dollar sloughs off its remaining value, whichever comes first.”

  8. Teddy Partridge says:

    You realize that any time taken by Congress to even think for one moment about this breathtaking scheme will be called “dithering” and will be blamed when the inevitable collapse actually does occur.

    The Bush Administration is asking for another off-budget spending plan the size of the Iraq war.

  9. plunger says:

    The masters of the universe, who own and control the World Bank and IMF have simply done to us what has been proven to work on every third world nation they have done it to before…loan so much money that you end up controlling all the assets, and the government.

    Ask Henry Kissinger how it works.

    Politics and politicians are are a total side show. Meaningless.

  10. sojourner says:

    This sounds pessimistic, but I fear that no matter how much money we sink into that blackhole to bail out Wall Street, this economy cannot be fixed without some serious regulations put in place. Coupled with the bottomless pit known as the Iraq War, there is not enough money. Note, too, that the term “inflation” has not even appeared yet — and it will also be borne by all Americans through escalating prices and lowered values.

    I am going to make some very strong phone calls Monday morning. “NO” just cannot be spoken loud enough.

    • perris says:

      This sounds pessimistic, but I fear that no matter how much money we sink into that blackhole to bail out Wall Street, this economy cannot be fixed without some serious regulations put in place brought back

      these maggots eliminated the regulations that were there to prevent this exact scenario

      and mccain is at the heart of it

      he has the NERVE to now go on about “deregulating the health care industry” when exactly the OPOSITE is called for in ALL industry

      • perris says:

        c and l;

        Here’s what McCain has to say about the wonders of market-based health reform:

        Opening up the health insurance market to more vigorous nationwide competition, as we have done over the last decade in banking, would provide more choices of innovative products less burdened by the worst excesses of state-based regulation.

        So McCain, who now poses as the scourge of Wall Street, was praising financial deregulation like 10 seconds ago – and promising that if we marketize health care, it will perform as well as the financial industry!

        Mr Deregulator would destroy what’s left of our health care system. For those who have it at this point and can barely afford it, that is.

  11. eyesonthestreet says:

    Glad to see the outrage here.

    I am so cynical at this point I think it would be just desserts to hand this mess back to the Republicans, let McPalin have it.

  12. R.H. Green says:

    As I understand it, Senators Dodd and Schumer were given a briefing last evening. They reported it as a somber affair that depicted the meltdown of the western world in only a few days; urgent legislative authority is being requested.

    Also last night I got to see Kevin Phillips on Bill Moyers. Without naming anyone, Phillips scoffingly described things as a matter of a bunch of arsonists setting fire to things, and then showing up to volunteer as firemen to puts things aright. He pointed out how Paulson is involved with Goldman Sachs (I think that was the investment firm stated), and his plan to save the economy is neatly aimed to save the financial industry.

  13. Leen says:

    Friday evening here in Athens Ohio Governor Strickland our former Congressman) shared what he had spoken with Senator Sherrod Brown about earlier in the day. Senator Brown had been part of the meeting the night before having to do with the economic crisis. The word “crisis” and “quickly” kept being repeated. How critical it was that congress move on this this week. NOW.

    then I heard Senator Dodd on Hardball say that “the oxygen had left the room” during that meeting. He also expressed this sense of urgency.

    Reminded me just as it did Glenn of that push for the 2002 war resolution vote…it has to be now..now …nnow before the mid term election.

    WTF?

    These corporate welfare kings and queens need to be held accountable, investigated, the goods confiscated. Why is that these people are willing to share their losses with the American taxpayer but not the profits? These are the same people who vote against a health care for all, access to an equitable education system, and living wages.

    NO NO NO to these corporate welfare kings and queens. Investigate

  14. rkilowatt says:

    arbusto@4: re corporations as persons…this is a devastating misunderstanding long gone uncorrected.

    In his spellbinding Chapter 6—“The Deciding Moment”—Mr. Hartmann tells how corporate personhood was achieved.

    “…Orthodoxy has it the Supreme Court decided in 1886, in a case called Santa Clara County v. the Southern Pacific Railroad, that corporations were indeed legal persons. I express that view myself, in a recent book. So do many others. So do many law schools. We are all wrong.

    Mr. Hartmann undertook instead a conscientious search. He finally found the contemporary casebook, published in 1886, blew the dust away, and read Santa Clara County in the original, so to speak. Nowhere in the formal, written decision of the Court did he find corporate personhood mentioned. Not a word. The Supreme Court did NOT establish corporate personhood in Santa Clara County.

    In the casebook “headnote,” however, Mr. Hartmann read this statement: “The defendant Corporations are persons within the intent of the clause in section 1 of the Fourteenth Amendment…which forbids a State to deny to any person within its jurisdiction the equal protection of the laws.” Here, anyway, corporate personhood was “provided”— in the headnote, instead of the formal written decision of the Supreme Court. But that’s not good enough.

    What is a “headnote?” It is the summary description of a court decision, written into the casebook by the court reporter. It is similar to an editor’s “abstract” in a scientific journal. Because they are not products of the court itself, however, headnotes carry no legal weight; they can establish no precedent in law. Corporate personhood, Mr. Hartmann discovered, is simply and unequivocally illegitimate…”

    Above from http://www.rockisland.com/~rwbehan/ [if link n/g can google author Thom Hartmann’s book Unequal Protection…chapt 6.]

    The court reporter who inserted the the idea “corps have status of persons” had past, strong ties to the railroads, who were the 1886 case defendants.

  15. jayt says:

    Decisions by the Secretary pursuant to the authority of this Act are non-reviewable and committed to agency discretion, and may not be reviewed by any court of law or any administrative agency.

    blatantly, drastically, unprecedentedly unconstitutional.

    I generally don’t trust Congressional Dem’s any farther than I could throw the collective lot of them, but I simply cannot imagine that this provision will be allowed to stand.

  16. JClausen says:

    To the Barricades.

    I am sick about this manipulation of fear. It is time for Obama to have his FDR moment and we DFH’S have to lead the charge.

  17. acquarius74 says:

    ” Decisions by the Secretary pursuant to the authority of this Act are non-reviewable and committed to agency discretion, and may not be reviewed by any court of law or any administrative agency.”

    My children had more sense than to o.k. such a demand at age 8.

    How is this different from Bush’s executive orders demanding that none of his administration be subject to any law for acts committed during his administration? (i.e. torture, illegal wire-tapping, lying to lead nation into illegal war, OLC writing legislation, Stormtroopers manhandling and arresting reporters (Amy Goodman’s face will be forever imprinted upon my mind’s eye!)… on and on.

    And who wants this imperialistic power? The same handlers that were supposed to be responsible for seeing that no such meltdown happened.

    NO! NO! NO!

    Thank you EW! (do you ever sleep?)

    • acquarius74 says:

      In that opening quote demanding protection against any review or to be accountable under any court of law, what better warning could we have from Paulson that he has and/or intends to commit illegal acts in trying to rescue the Big Money Boys?

      What can we the people DO before it’s too late?

  18. JimWhite says:

    Don’t wait until Monday. Click my name for the fax I sent to Dodd this morning. They are working on the bill now. It could be presented to Congress in what they hope is final form Monday morning.

    • acquarius74 says:

      Jim, your letter to Sen. Dodd was excellent!
      I’m going to try an e-mail to him at the Senate Banking Committee. We should flood that committee with e-mails.

      There is something more sinister going on here. Hank Greenberg, founder and builder of AIG (forced out 2005) was on Charlie Rose this week (Monday?) It’s online in 2 segments now. He said that about 6 to 8 weeks ago he began trying to write and call the CEO of IGA, Bernanke, Paulson. He repeatedly offered his help, advice, whatever he could do to save IGA. He had financiers all over the world calling him to help, offering money for a buy-out. HE GOT NO RESPONSE FROM ANY OF THEM!!!

      So, what is the REAL reason Paulson wanted the gov (we taxpayers) to bear the burden of AIG’s collapse? Why not work with Greenberg and the group of backers to right the ship of AIG?

      http://www.charlierose.com (search site for Greenberg)

      How do you see this, Jim? Plunger? Anyone?

        • behindthefall says:

          from that “Dark Side” link:

          To a degree that would surprise the vast majority of the population, this unholy mess fits into the redesign of the United States drawn by the royalist neocons who hold sway over our economy and our government.

          So I’m not the only one who sees a conscious return to absolutist monarchy in this. I was starting to wonder.

        • acquarius74 says:

          Thanks for your links, John. So far I’ve read The Dark Side of WS. Will go to the other one now.

          I must also learn more about Paulson, Bernanke and Cox. hmmmm, all were big dogs at Goldman Sachs??? And GS is one of the 2 houses still afloat.

          You can find the rating for any bank by this link:

          http://www.TheStreet.com At that site go to tab “ratings”. At “ratings”, plug in the main word in the bank’s name. Result is A, A-, B. . .etc. If your bank is D or E, it’s time to get out. (mine is now C+ and I’m looking around).

          Anyone here seen the online video or read the book, Confessions of An Economic Hit-Man ?? World Bank, International Monetary Fund, and World Trade Organization team up, seduce nations into huge debt they can never pay, and thereafter control them. Are we there yet??

        • acquarius74 says:

          Thanks again, John, for the links at 36 . The article by Kuttner (alarming comparison between 1929 and present collapse) is shattering.

          Both refs saved to disk for further study. Don’t know what good it will do me, but at least I’ll understand to some degree how the SOB’s stole America!

      • prostratedragon says:

        I would only want comment from Hank Greenberg under oath in court, based on what has been long suspected about his role at AIG. Here’s a sample from when the troubles first appeared. Civil settlements eventually ensued, but the more recent troubles at AIG probably date from practices during the earlier period under Greenberg.

        Whatever else Greenberg might have achieved as a business innovator over the years, his involvment in exactly the sort of operations that have led to the present crisis ought to keep his offers for help unaccepted until a long list of others has been exhausted.

        Of course by the same standard Henry Paulson certainly should be disqualified as the lead proposer and prospective Führer.

        • acquarius74 says:

          Thanks for the link, Dragon. Much there to study. Is there a Hank Greenberg Jr.? I understood from Charlie Rose show that the founder of AIG is now 83 yrs old and was forced out in 2005. The article at link indicates Greenberg in trouble in March, 2008. I truly have more research to do.

    • MadDog says:

      I wish to second Jim’s comments, only in a more forceful tone:

      Do Not Wait Until Monday!!!

      It may be too late by then. Our Congresscritters are working on this right this very moment and will continue through the weekend!

      Monday is probably too late. The deal maybe signed, sealed and delivered before Monday when the markets open again!

  19. rkilowatt says:

    re Healthcare. A bit of missing hstory. As a teenager I had actual, insider {I won’t say how] knowledge for years of hospital shenanigans. My recalls are from connection to 1 of the finest, Eastcoast hospitals, an old, non-profit institution.

    This H never turned away anyone from excellent emergency care. All walk-ins were treated/overseen by the best physicians… because for any doc to have the right to send his private patients into this H, he also had to serve a rigid number of volunteer hours monthly in the H.

    In the 1950’s things changed. Congress passed laws making for-profit Hs very attractive to profiteers. Area Hs began sending emergency patients who could not pay, to this “no one refused” H…by taxi, car, ambulance or even ambulant. This H began to be overwhelmed, especially after pressuring “friends” of the H for more and more donations. This H thru the 1970’s continued their policy of always giving care without regard to ability to pay. From then to now I do not know what is their status, altho an internet check shows they are still very active [they opened another H in a very affluent area and I believe maintain the original H via donation funding from the affluent area].

    I well recall the administrators [mostly docs] worry and frustration and angst and desperation to continue service to all vs. paying the costs for medecines, supplies, etc.

    Hs have become legal rackets since the ’50s. The earlier legislation had to do w gov’t subsidies and accounting/tax benefits that enabled large profits to be hidden in creative “costs”.

    BTW, I received hospital emer. med care for infection in Quebec abt 1955. Asked abt paying and was told no charge “This is a free hospital” run by IIRC the RC Church. Never forgot it.

  20. spiny says:

    You would think that for 700 billion, the Dems could at least get something for their troubles. Is a resignation of Bush & Cheney too much to ask for?

    Unfortunately, with Pelosi, Hoyer & Reid at the helm, were pretty screwed on this one, don’t you think? They appear to be fundamentally compromised by their corporate contributors and their fear of the right wing noise machine. Our congressional leadership’s only interest seems to be “winning” the next election so they can get bigger offices, better parking spaces, get invited to better parties and maybe extort a couple more $K a year from their corporate lobbyist palls. I’ve always thought that it would be good politics for Obama to start taking these clowns on (or at least the corruption they represent). This might be a good place to start- He’s going to have to do this eventually anyways if he really wants to accomplish anything meaningful if he gets elected. And by meaningful, I mean anything that isn’t another Bush era give-away to corporate America.

  21. Hmmm says:

    Not just No. Hell No.

    They have to stabilize the value of the underlying mortgages, or else it’s all yet another patch-up on a doomed shell game.

  22. BooRadley says:

    ew, I hope someone is faxing your posts and Ian Walsh’s to the Black Caucus and to the Unions. We need them to bring their weight to bear in this fight.

  23. JimWhite says:

    The US GDP is $14 trillion. This bill gives away 5% of the GDP with zero oversight and no recourse if Paulson simply chose to take all the money for himself and run away. (He could merely have a friend write a $1 IOU to himself and then “sell” it for the $700 billion.)

  24. MadDog says:

    Decisions by the Secretary pursuant to the authority of this Act are non-reviewable and committed to agency discretion, and may not be reviewed by any court of law or any administrative agency.

    In case folks think the above quote of the proposed legislation sounds familiar, you can find similar language in…wait for it…Sub-prime Mortgages!

    And they thought we couldn’t be fooled again. Hah!

    • prostratedragon says:

      MD, do you have a link to a representative covenant? (As a renter I’m lucky enough not to have one of my very own.)

      One of my main working assumptions is that not only are Those People essentially conmen, but they are also exceptionally cheap and insulting ones.

        • prostratedragon says:

          I admire your deadpan.

          Speaking of which, technical critique is ongoing at Calculated Risk. CR points out that under the circumstances, Paulson’s proposal amounts to something called a reverse Dutch auction, which is just about the worst kind imaginable for the situation. I.e.:

          We think of auctions as being organized by someone who has something to sell, and solicits bids from buyers. The bidding starts from some price that is minimally acceptable to the seller, in that although she’d like more, she’ll take this price. The price on offer rises as bidders compete with each other by proposing prices above the current offer, with the highest ultimate bid taking home the goods.

          A reverse Dutch auction does a double switch on this standard kind of auction. Reverse, in that it is organized by a buyer who solicits offers from sellers —both governments and firms use reverse auctions for procurement of goods and services all the time— and Dutch in that the offering bids start out high and are bid down until the lowest bid that the auction organizer will accept; the deal is then made at that price.

          Dutch auctions are used in situations like treasury auctions, where the organizing seller has a great deal of something to sell, and many prospective buyers no one of whom will take more than a portion of the thing (T-bills, say) being sold. Then the Dutch auction amounts to ranking all the buyers bids from highest to lowest price and allocating the T-bills to them from the highest until the bills run out; all of the bidders pay whatever that low runout price was, so any buyer who’d been willing to pay more gets a bargain.

          Now try to wrap your mind around combining those two reverses, and add in the fact that the goods Paulson is conducting this RDA for aren’t a lump of identical T-bills that all the selling “banks” have, but a lot of pretty much uniquely formed topiary shitpiles for which he, Paulson, is absolutely guaranteed to be the High, Low, and Only Bidder in the Universe for the next decade or more; it’s like having a separate RDA on each lot of mortgages or mtg securities against that massive bailout fund. And note in addtion that the $700B is the size of the fund, not the maximum total expenditure; if someone can be found to park the damn things, the resulting freedom to the fund balance can be re-spent. The word “churn” comes unpleasantly to mind.

          That’s the incisive reasoning by which CR has concluded that the minimum cost to the taxpayer will be the full amount $700Billion. No calculator needed.

          NYTimes Makes a Funny

  25. katymine says:

    Don’t forget the toll-free numbers to the capital switchboard

    1 (800) 828 – 0498
    1 (800) 459 – 1887
    1 (800) 614 – 2803
    1 (866) 340 – 9281
    1 (866) 338 – 1015
    1 (877) 851 – 6437

    Make a call, ask for the congressperson or senator, talk to their staff, hang up and then hit redial, do it again…. over and over again

  26. tbsa says:

    Why are we expected to bail these fuckers out. They refuse to help those losing their homes, but we have no choice but to pay up. I am so far beyond disgusted…. spit.

  27. DrDick says:

    EPU’d from Ian’s post downstairs.

    I just sent the following letter to my congressional delegation, the congressional leadership, and the committees with oversight. I urge everyone to send their own.

    I just read the administration’s plan for the Wall Street bailout. My initial reaction is, “You are out of your tiny little minds!” This is a monstrously bad plan with no guidelines for dispensing the money, no protections for taxpayers, and explicitly prohibits any oversight. Any member of Congress brain dead enough to vote for this proposal deserves to be tarred and feathered, placed in the stocks, and pelted with rotten produce, before being run out of the country.

    If we have learned anything over the past eight years, it is that you never give any member of the Bush administration a blank check for anything. This administration, best noted for gross incompetence and pervasive corruption, cannot be trusted with spare change, let alone $700 billion, without intensive, detailed oversight. It would not be unreasonable given their record to require specific direct congressional approval for each and every expenditure (including for postage). Strict controls and oversight by both Congress and the courts must be in place before even considering any proposal from this administration.

    Any acceptable proposal must include detailed guidelines for spending the money including mandatory discounting of financial instruments purchased, replacement of the all senior executives and boards of institutions receiving assistance, implementation of strict regulations and oversight of these institutions, and guarantees that the taxpayers will be the primary beneficiaries of this program. Anything is simply rewards, stupidity, incompetence, and unbridled greed. I urge you in the strongest possible terms to reject this and any other proposal which does not meet these standards.

    We need to flood their offices so they are more afraid of us than of Wall Street or the preznit.

  28. billybugs says:

    There is no way this bill will pass in its current form
    Way too much power given to a single person
    no real oversight

    did you see that number at the end of the bill $11 trillion dollars in debt!

    • billybugs says:

      Shouldn’t the people who created this mess be held responsible

      If McSame want to fire someone why not start on wall street!

  29. epns says:

    No Taxation (loans) Without Representation

    Dear Humans

    It’s all about trust, or lack of it. America has now completely trashed its already tarnished reputation in the rest of the world by screaming the virtues of the ‘free market’ and then dropping all adherence to those principles when the first major salvo was launched against their inadequately regulated financial sector.

    To say that this has been a long time coming would be an understatement. All the seeds of destruction were in-place years ago. The coupling of voracious greed in a unsupervised and deregulated soup has now lead to unbridled fear and panic as the shaky unsupported edifice is torpedoed by harsh economic reality. The massive US deficit, it’s gargantuan overseas borrowings and its maniacal spending on illegal wars and tax cuts for the rich were the harbingers of doom.

    The problem is that this easily foreseen disaster is going to infect not just America but many innocents abroad. Maybe that is why the rest of us should have a say in how the worlds super-power is governed by giving the vote to America’s creditors; the world.

  30. Teddy Partridge says:

    Here’s my email and FAX to Pelosi, Feinstein, and Boxer:

    Dear Congresswoman Pelosi:

    NO BAILOUT WITHOUT ACCOUNTABILITY!

    I am absolutely shocked that Congress is even considering a bailout of the financial services industry that includes NO accountability or oversight, NO restructuring of the financial system, NO return to rational leverage limitations, NO elimination of golden parachutes, NO relief for homeowners who are being foreclosed RIGHT NOW, and NO penalties for the Bush Administration for allowing this to happen.

    JUST LIKE 9.11, IRAQ, and KATRINA, THIS HAPPENED ON THEIR WATCH!

    Please seek Secretary Paulson and Fed Chair Bernanke’s resignation. Get Dodd and Frank on the case big time.

    This is not the Patriot Act. This is not the FAA. This is not FISA. This is not AUMF. Please do this right — no power grab by the Bush Administration.

    Finally, MAKE GEORGE BUSH PAY FOR THIS. Make him implement a one-time Financial Markets Emergency Tax to recover the three or four trillion dollars that has gone up-escalator to the richistans. Get our money back!

    I apologize for all the CAPITALs. You know I don’t usually write this way, but this is DANGEROUS. Step back and do this right, please.

    Thank you for your service to California and to the United States of America.

    Sincerely,

  31. TobyWollin says:

    I also smell the odor of last August when they pushed and harassed and gave congress the bums rush on FISA – remember that? The terrorists were at the gates!! They were going to attack the Capital!! Remember THAT? I do. And we fought and scratched and clawed and we still lost. That never should have happened and the exact same thing is going on here. “Do something NOW!!” “The world is going to melt down if we don’t do something NOW!!”

  32. Hugh says:

    This is my latest update to entry 87 of my scandals list which deals with the housing bubble:

    On September 20, 2008, the Bush Administration announced its plan to bailout financial institutions holding toxic mortgage backed securities. It would invest Henry Paulson with vast new powers. As CEO and Chairman of the investment bank Goldman Sachs, Paulson championed the deregulation and bad practices that led to the current financial meltdown. For the last two years, as Treasury Secretary, he did nothing to stave off the bursting of the housing bubble and until the last two weeks nothing to address its aftermath. The Administration’s proposal would give him $700 billion and absolute unrestricted discretion to buy toxic mortgage backed securities from whom he wants, at what price he wants, and do what he wants with them, without review by anyone, outside of a pro forma report to Congress.

    Decisions by the Secretary pursuant to the authority of this Act are non-reviewable and committed to agency discretion, and may not be reviewed by any court of law or any administrative agency.

    This is an impossibly bad idea for the 4 reasons I gave in the last paragraph but in addition puts one of the worst actors in charge of the “cleanup”.

    Oh and those previous 4 reasons?

    First, it rewards those whose greed and stupidity are most responsible for this disaster. Second, it doesn’t help homeowners who have been completely forgotten in the rush to “stabilize” financial markets. Third, it leaves taxpayers holding the bag for what will end up costing them trillions. Fourth, it does nothing to change and re-regulate the financial system so this won’t happen again.

  33. VADEM says:

    One more time the dems are being scared into this.

    Decisions by the Secretary pursuant to the authority of this Act are non-reviewable and committed to agency discretion, and may not be reviewed by any court of law or any administrative agency.

    No oversight. Zip, zero, nada AND Obama is supporting it.

    I’m disgusted.

  34. prostratedragon says:

    While at Salon checking out Greenwald, you might also take a look at Andrew Leonard’s history lesson going back to the thirties, at the end of which he comes out of the closet:

    Conservatives and libertarians are quick to paint progressives as conspiracy theorists for seeing Wall Street manipulation behind every new piece of Congressional regulation or deregulation. But isn’t that how it’s always worked? Powerful interests manipulate the laws. As a society, we have two ways to deal with this: […]

    Basically, either stand up as citizens, or forget about it.

    A History Lesson from the Great Depression

  35. goldstandard says:

    First it was Bear Stearns, then Fannie Mae and Freddie Mac, and now AIG, a company that has insured bad loans and collateralized debt instruments all over the globe. But rather than allow these corporations to fail, the Fed has chosen to bankrupt the U.S. taxpayer instead, trading one potential disaster for another. Billions of dollars have been handed over to these corporations from the U.S. Treasury in exchange for toxic assets. Literally trillions of dollars more are at risk. This is not responsible government. It will be a disastrous financial burden for those who can least afford it.
    Now we, the people, are beginning to pay for all the failures of the Bush administration. After Enron, it was evident for all to see that the Security and Exchange Commission, headed by another Bush crony, wasn’t minding the store. Instead of taking decisive action, the Republican Congress chose to focus on 9/11 and the threat of terrorism, ignoring all else. The media and the public (and the Democrats) followed like lambs. There were laws on the books to oversee the financial institutions, including Fannie and Freddie, but both sides, thanks to lobbyists filling their coffers, looked the other way as fiscal improprieties were committed.

    I sincerely believe that banking establishments are more dangerous than standing armies, and that the principle of spending money to be paid by posterity, under the name of funding, is but swindling futurity on a large scale.
    I believe that banking institutions are more dangerous to our liberties than standing armies. If the American people ever allow private banks to control the issue of their currency, first by inflation, then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around [the banks] will deprive the people of all property until their children wake-up homeless on the continent their fathers conquered. The issuing power should be taken from the banks and restored to the people, to whom it properly belongs.
    Thomas Jefferson, Letter to the Secretary of the Treasury Albert Gallatin (1802)

  36. goldstandard says:

    There is a better way out of this. The federal Reserve has already blown through half of its 800 Billion reserves in baling out others such as Indy Mac. Paulson wants 700 billion + which will be just jacks for openers. Rather than creating 700 Billion out of thin air to keep this corrupt system afloat, Congress which is in charge of weights and measures currently states that all of our countries physical gold holdings ( real money ) are only worth $42.50 per ounce. Why, when the rest of the world says that gold is worth $900 per ounce?
    Get the price of our gold in line with the rest of the world and but out the Federal Reserve and cut off the heads of this hydra that has been sucking this country dry for nearly 100 years. I find it quite odd that Mr. Cox of the S.E.C. can call a halt to short selling banks, but when ot comes to real money, it is manipulated beyond belief when the real proce of gold should be well past $2,000 per ounce with an economy that is currently running an inflation rate of 13%.
    If we don’t take a stand now, our children and their great grand children will be slaves to the banking masters. Our Constitution never called for a central bank, but a US Treasury with coin in gold and silver. Getting rid of the Fed would be a major step in the right direction. Even Greenspan agreed that the statists hated gold as a monetary unit because they couldn’t expand the economy fast enough to suit them. The problem today is that politicians have become parasites sucking on the teets of the bankers for without them, it is the people who end up controlling their lives and not government, and that’s the way it should be.

  37. brendanx says:

    This is nothing like the Patriot Act. That could be rammed through simply by stimulating fear/hate receptors. This time the implications of the collapse are still unknown, and will certainly not create the palpable shock like 9-11 did in the public. Meanwhile, voters have already been feeling the consequences of the Republican economy for years. There is not going to be any public backing for giving the Bush administration $700 billion no strings attached. This should be an easy one for Democrats to turn to their advantage and make the election a landslide. Should be.

  38. DeanOR says:

    There is an alternative to this disgraceful ripoff. Hillary Clinton today proposed a return of the Home Owners Loan Corporation, a New Deal program that helped people pay their mortgage payments. It’s a winner for the people, but of course it would require Dems in Congress to actually take a stand for the people. The lenders have already made a pile of money on these mortgages. It would be unconscionable to bail them out now that they’re reaping the long-term consequences of their irresponsible greed. Let’s help the people, not the financiers. Let it trickle up instead of down, if there is to be any trickling.

  39. brendanx says:

    Hyperbole and hyperventilating. All the Democrats have to do is say fuck you to Bush and it’s over for the Republicans. You think Obama doesn’t read Paul Krugman? Okay, it’s scary: they can always whiff at this fat pitch over the middle, or, perhaps more appropriately when talking about the Democrats, be called out looking. But judging by the initial cognizance of what a scam this is here and on the op-ed pages of major newspapers, we should alloy our anger with optimism.

    • Hmmm says:

      Of course I hope you’re right. But if the money guys (who run Bush) are threatening the Ds that they’ll crash the economy if they don’t get what they want, then they’re holding all of us hostage and the Ds may see capitulating as necessary to save us (in the aggregate).

    • stryder says:

      That’s the problem.There’s a list a mile long that the dems should’ve said fuck you to.I’m surprised they havn’t called this a national security issue,or a continuity of gov issue and write some pixie dust/secret memo to do whatever they want to

  40. brendanx says:

    In the NYT article on this I saw nothing that discouraging, except for Schumer’s statement that the bill ”is a good start.” Pelosi and Obama say a stimulus has to be part of any bill. And compare what a Bush kamikaze like Boehner (It’s pronounced ”BANER”. Really) says with McCain’s queasiness about the political ramifications. McCain is not yet on board with his party line of granting a wish list.

    Mr. Boehner added, “Efforts to exploit this crisis for political leverage or partisan quid pro quo will only delay the economic stability that families, seniors and small businesses deserve.”

    Aides to Senator Barack Obama of Illinois, the Democratic presidential nominee, said he was reviewing the proposal. In Florida, Mr. Obama told voters he would press for a broader economic stimulus.

    “We have to make sure that whatever plan our government comes up with works not just for Wall Street, but for Main Street,” Mr. Obama said. “We have to make sure it helps folks cope with rising prices, and sparks job creation, and helps homeowners stay in their homes.”

    Senator John McCain of Arizona, the Republican nominee, issued a statement saying he, too, was reviewing the plan.

    • prostratedragon says:

      I’ll bet that in the unlikely event that a MBS bond were bought from a trustee at a price below its face value, some of the owners of the bond who were supposed to get the cash payouts from it might try to sue to recover any shortfall in the contracted payments.

      But like I said, in a reverse Dutch auction, run by insider no less, that event is unlikely. Even so, we all know that no stated reason is likely to be the real one, which is to blow yet another hole into our system of governance, the traitors!

      • Hmmm says:

        Well, exactly. But usually there’s some at least distantly probable cover reason offered, and I haven’t heard one yet this time. Puzzling over what kind of lipstick (forgive me) they could put on that pig.

  41. Hmmm says:

    Some of the previous EO’s had property forfeiture stuff built into them. What happens when you cross that with this monstrosity?

  42. rkilowatt says:

    In view of the hustle for an Emergency Bailout To Save The World, I suggest that Paulson/Bernanke tell the POTUS and VPOTUS ” that I will ONLY sign 30 seconds after they both resign from office and President Pelosi is installed;and Paulson/Bernanke, too…or some such.

    Wouldn’t they agree? to save the world? Wouldn’t you agree if you were in their position?

    In view of the hustle for an “Emergency Bailout To Save The World”, I would suggest that Paulson/Bernanke tell the POTUS and VPOTUS ” that I will ONLY sign 30 seconds after they both resign from office and President Pelosi is installed…Wouldn’t they agree? to save the world? Wouldn’t you agree if you were in that position?

    In view of the hustle for an “Emergency Bailout To Save The World”, I would suggest that Paulson/Bernanke tell the POTUS and VPOTUS ” that I will ONLY sign 30 seconds after they both resign from office and President Pelosi is installed…Wouldn’t they agree? to save the world? Wouldn’t you agree if you were in that position?

    • BooRadley says:

      THE TRILLION DOLLAR MELTDOWN by Charles R. Morris is excellent. Ian Walsh hosted him for a really excellent FDL Book Salon.

      The banks sold the loans and they were turned into securities, which were sold on margin to hedgefunds and others. Those securities are everywhere. pension funds, mutual funds, you name it. We’re going to have to kick in something. Per Ian and ew, however, Paulson’s plan is whacked.

  43. phred says:

    Late again, but just wanted to add (after reading both you and Glenzilla this morning), that when it comes down to it, this is really all our fault. In a few weeks we the voters of this country will all dutifully go to the polls and vote for Democrats and Republicans in vast numbers. What will it take, how far will they have to go before the voters, en masse, declare enough is enough and withhold their support from the major parties? From what I can tell, there is no act so egregious, unfair, unlawful, or contrary to our system of government that will cause voters to change their vote. We the sheeple…

  44. suffragette says:

    The BBC’s business reporter is noting that some international banks could also be bailed out from their bad decisions by this:
    http://www.bbc.co.uk/blogs/the…..nster.html

    “According to the draft proposal put to Congress, Paulson would have very wide discretion in deciding precisely what “mortgage-related assets” could be purchased, but they would include “residential or commercial mortgages and any securities, obligations or other instruments that are based on or related to such mortgages”.

    Banks eligible to sell to this Treasury-owned bank would be banks with significant operations in the US – so, for example, Royal Bank of Scotland (which has a big retail business in the US) and Barclays would be able to dump their toxic mortgage-related investments on the Treasury, but HBOS and Lloyds TSB (which have less of the nasty stuff, in any case) probably wouldn’t be able to do so.”

    If any point could raise the ire of the general public enough to contact Congress and push them to change this before enacting it, that might be the point.

  45. 4jkb4ia says:

    I will link to knzn’s “Bailouts for Fun and Profit” just to be cranky. However on the larger issue EW and Glenn are both absolutely right. Congress has every right to demand more than token oversight and at least an idea of how these securities will be priced. Since there is a very short time to pass this thing I am not optimistic that they won’t display frightened herd behavior.

  46. 4jkb4ia says:

    I read the damned knzn post again. This entire thing comes down to what the banks can be psychologically induced to sell their bad assets for.

  47. bell says:

    skdadl 101 – for anyone who has watched the financial markets with keen interest, this latest ‘event’ has been unfolding in steps and bits for quite some time… for anyone interested in understanding the us banking system pick up the book ‘creature from jekyll island’ by G. Edward Griffin… the end to the story isn’t going to be pretty, but it might be prolonged for an indefinitely long time…. no telling when the jig is up, but my guess is we are entering a very turbulent phase for the next 4 years..

    • skdadl says:

      It’s not fair, y’know? I am having to follow two — count ‘em, TWO — nutty elections at the same time, all the while watching economic meltdowns, and I am still thinking of seeking asylum in Iceland or something.

  48. DrDave says:

    How about everyone who got us into this mess has to move into one of those vacant trailers in New Orleans and give up enough of their executive incomes toward the debt so they live on minimum wage.

  49. Justina says:

    Here’s a link though which you can write to your congressional representative to protest the further looting of our treasury through the 700 Billion Bail-Out bill: http://www.visi.com/juan/congress.

    Not a single penny of that 700 Billion will go to help the poor and middle class Americans who are facing bankruptcy and foreclosure.

    If we add 700 Billion to our already huge deficit, there will truly be no money for health care, education, alternative energy development and job creation, it will all have gone to the wealthy fascists who are destroying our democracy and our economy.

  50. radiofreewill says:

    I was at a working class – no college degrees – sports bar yesterday, lightly filled with hard-working, but exhausted, people who have ‘pays-the-bills’ jobs.

    These people are in shock. They don’t understand the Wall Street melt-down – they just know it’s bad – and they seem to feel that they, somehow, are going to pay for this disaster, too. A lot of people around these parts have a growing resentment for Washington’s Policy of “When Government fucks-up, We Pay.”

    The talk was all doom and gloom, with almost no cheering for teams going on. It’s been about six months since I’ve visited this side of town, and I was surprised at the number of newly boarded-up businesses and over-grown lots. The local economy here has visibly contracted.

    More dread than hope in their eyes, voices, and body language, too. These folks are ‘all worn out’ and don’t know what they’re going to do if they get hit with another set-back – if the car breaks down, or if they get sick and miss work, or if any number of life’s little detours shows up – there is no safety for them, and they are acutely aware of it.

    Also, I heard several people say, “She’s a gimmick,” when Sarah Palin’s name came up.

  51. stryder says:

    Fascist writer Westbrook Pegler, an avowed racist who Sarah Palin approvingly quoted in her acceptance speech for the moral superiority of small town values, expressed his fervent hope about my father, Robert F. Kennedy, as he contemplated his own run for the presidency in 1965, that “some white patriot of the Southern tier will spatter his spoonful of brains in public premises before the snow flies.”

    It might be worth asking Governor Palin for a tally of the other favorites from her reading list.
    RFK

    • Boston1775 says:

      Fascist writer Westbrook Pegler, an avowed racist who Sarah Palin approvingly quoted in her acceptance speech for the moral superiority of small town values, expressed his fervent hope about my father, Robert F. Kennedy, as he contemplated his own run for the presidency in 1965, that “some white patriot of the Southern tier will spatter his spoonful of brains in public premises before the snow flies.”

      It might be worth asking Governor Palin for a tally of the other favorites from her reading list.
      RFK
      ——————————–

      I don’t know Westbrook Pegler, and I don’t have the heart to google for the information. I was so stunned when I read what you wrote last evening I couldn’t reply to you. I’d just returned from celebrating my father’s 80th birthday, a New England dinner we’d all made at his house, brothers and sisters bound together by the love for a man who has served his God – God or the Good, as he says – as a minister in Congregational churches which date back to the sixteen and 1700’s.

      When I read what you wrote, that Sarah Palin quoted a man who called for your father’s death, I became overwhelmed with our lifetimes of confronting and my occasional running from these people who share streaks of cruelty.

      What is unbelievable to me is that Sarah Palin has been videotaped sharing with Wasilla teens about having been prayed over by a witch hunter, Pastor Muthee, to help her become governor.

      ———————

      According to the Christian Science Monitor, six months of fervent prayer and research identified the source of the witchcraft as a local woman called Mama Jane, who ran a “divination” centre called the Emmanuel Clinic.

      Her alleged involvement in fortune-telling and the fact that she lived near the site of a number of fatal car accidents led Pastor Muthee to publicly declare her a witch responsible for the town’s ills, and order her to offer up her soul for salvation or leave Kiambu.

      After Pastor Muthee declared Mama Jane a witch, the townspeople became suspicious and began to turn on her, demanding that she be stoned. Public outrage eventually led the police to raid her home, where they fired gunshots, killing a pet python which they believed to be a demon.

      http://mudflats.wordpress.com/…..o-wasilla/

      ——————————

      Sarah Palin expresses no concern that townspeople called for the stoning of this woman, no concern that she quoted a man in her acceptance speech who called for the death of your father.

      Bobby, I worked with your brothers in 1979 and 80 to help elect your uncle. I treasure that time traveling around the country. In particular, I got to know Michael, and in knowing Michael I felt I got to know your father. I am crying as I write this. We don’t seem to have won.

      Except that there is this guy named Barack.

      Thank you for your sacrifice.

    • acquarius74 says:

      RFK,

      I hear you.

      Yes, those with small or no souls are still among us, but if the world had never known your Dad and Uncle Jack, that group today would still be the majority. The cost of that gain was too high, but I sense that they knew they had to make their stand for if not they, who??

      I was watching the convention that fateful night when Pegler’s venomous
      spoutings bore fruit. Insanity, nothing less.

      Today who can remember anything Pegler said or did, other than his victims?

      Today and forevermore your Dad’s and Uncle Jack’s words and deeds still shine and their truth rings out. Their words also bore fruit, good lifegiving fruit. Every time you pass a person of color in the halls of Congress, business, the art and music world, academia, etc., you can mentally chalk up a win for your Dad.

      My mother died of melanoma when I was ten years old. It is a different road we walk.

      I wish the best of all gifts for you throughout your life and career. I feel certain that all your endeavors will produce Good.

      . . . these pathetic words. . . please forgive,

      Peggy Wingfield

  52. acquarius74 says:

    At the link below you will find an opportunity to sign a petition to be delivered to Speaker Pelosi, Rep Hoyer, Rep Barney Frank, Sen. Chris Dodd, Sen. Harry Reid. Subject of the petition is No Blank Check for Wall Street. The petition is circulated by CredoMobile, my phone company, which contributes a percentage of their profits to worthy causes.

    Please click the link, consider what you read there, and sign the petition if you choose (there is a box for your individual message).

    http://act..credoaction.com/ca…..8;rc=paste

    Thanks.

  53. timbo says:

    Wow. This brings “Trust us!” to a whole new level. Like, um, why should we trust these guys with our money when they’re trying to bail out their friends?