Ponzi Nation

Atrios and others have been having some perverse fun tracking the number and frequency of banks getting eated. But there’s another disturbing trend passing largely unnoticed (save for its more spectacular examples): the number of Ponzi schemes the SEC busts up.

Counting just the schemes the SEC issues a press release on and labels a Ponzi scheme (and using the SEC’s most conservative estimate for the size of the scheme), there have been 19 Ponzi schemes in the last year, amounting to $17,848 million dollars in fraud (Bernie Madoff counts for the bulk of that–$17 billion–and I did not include Stanford’s scheme, since SEC has not used the word "Ponzi" in their public releases on it yet). 

Date   Name Amount (000s)
4/13/09   Maximum Return Investments 23,000
4/9/09   Richard Copeland 35,000
4/8/09   Shawn Merriman 17,000
4/6/09   Overseas China Fund 50,000
4/1/09   Gemini Fund 50,000
3/26/09   Millenium Bank 68,000
3/11/09   Equity Investment Management and Trading 40,000
2/19/09   Billion Coupons 4,400
1/15/09   CRE Capital Corporation 25,000
1/8/09   Joseph Forte 50,000
12/30/08   Creative Capital Consortium 23,000
12/11/08   Madoff 17,000,000
11/12/08   Biltmore Financial 25,000
10/30/08   Bottom Line and Summit 30,000
10/6/08   Norman Hsu 60,000
9/16/08   Cornerstone Capital Management 15,000
9/15/08   PIPE Investments 52,700
8/11/08   Wextrust 255,000
5/2/08   Safevest 25,000
      17,848,100

And in an April 1 press release, the SEC said it had shut down 75 Ponzi schemes in the last two years (it only released a press release for one more Ponzi scheme in that time). In other words, the SEC has actually been shutting down more Ponzi schemes than the number of banks the FDIC eated

Now, a lot of those schemes target a particular potentially vulnerable or trusting class of people. (One Ponzi scheme targeted the deaf, for example, and others targeted particular ethnic groups.) 

Even accounting for the ways these schemers have instilled trust among their targets, this is still a big number of Ponzi schemes. Doesn’t anyone look for the tangible product at the end of a money-making scheme anymore?

image_print
72 replies
  1. Leen says:

    “amounting to 17,848 million dollars in fraud” not sure here EW but do you mean billion? those millions and billions are hard for me to keep straight

    Casino capitalism gone fucking wild

  2. sojourner says:

    Personally, I think it is more a matter of how greedy these people are! They WANT to believe that they will see the return that is promised, and perhaps some of them do. It is the poor suckers at the end who totally lose out.

    I don’t know how actively the SEC has investigated the people that run these things, or how many others may turn up. The greed factor just astounds me, though… It seems like for the last 20 years (probably since Reagan) there has been an incredible focus on faster and bigger returns on investments, while there has been an equally incredible decline in national and corporate infrastructures. In other words, investors are demanding the faster and bigger returns at the expense of everything else. There is no real growth because eventually someone has to pay the piper for what has NOT been handled — either required equipment or loss of personnel.

    Stated another way, I think that most public companies in the US are Ponzi schemes. It is all about appearances for investors and keeping that bottom line looking good.

    How the heck can we get away from this mindset? It is totally idiotic and detrimental to any real economic growth…

    • emptywheel says:

      Stated another way, I think that most public companies in the US are Ponzi schemes. It is all about appearances for investors and keeping that bottom line looking good.

      Yup, that’s kind of where I was going with the title.

      • freepatriot says:

        you’re giving mr ponzi WAAAAAAY too much credit

        he never put so much effort and paperwork into the fleecing of his investors

        or maybe you misunderestimate the amount of brainwork it takes to create this whirlwind of bullshit

    • prostratedragon says:


      How the heck can we get away from this mindset? It is totally idiotic and detrimental to any real economic growth…

      But apparently fundamental to human society. A classic historical source, complete on-line:

      Memoirs of Extraordinary Popular Delusions and the Madness of Crowds (1852) by Charles Mackay

      This is not why economics is called the dismal science, but it does get toward why so many economists are of either a gloomy or a sardonic turn of mind.

      Notwithstanding Ponzi-like features, sometimes I think Charles Ponzi’s name gets overused; after all, he produced nothing. At all. Had nothing to pay his current investors except the revenues from buy-in by his new one. No surplus from anywhere except the growth of the investor base was being generated.

      But there are plenty of other scams.

    • emptywheel says:

      Somehow I should have figured you’d be the one to make that crack.

      Different Shawn Merriman. I think.

      The Ponzi scheme guy is in CO. Did Merriman get traded to the arch-rival Broncos in the off-season?

      • randiego says:

        Did Merriman get traded to the arch-rival Broncos in the off-season?

        Heh. The Broncos are still tryin’ to fill their vacancy at QB.

        At least they won’t have to launder so many hankies this year.

    • freepatriot says:

      I don’t know

      you’d think a ponzi scheme would warrant more than a 4 game suspension …

      • BayStateLibrul says:

        Beckett got six games for throwing at Abreu.
        I saw it happen, he didn’t mean, it just got away…

    • randiego says:

      4/8/09 Shawn Merriman 17,000

      The linebacker on roids from the Ran Diego Frightening Bolts was a Ponzi scheme??
      Get out!

      Sweet!
      Oh wait, it’s not the Shawne Merriman Fund.

  3. earlofhuntingdon says:

    Doesn’t anyone look for the tangible product at the end of a money-making scheme anymore?

    Not if your targets are the new newly wealthy, who need tax deductions to hide it. As if paying tax on a third of found income were the end of the world. Wait until it goes up to 40% and their income shrinks to what’s earned.

  4. freepatriot says:

    we need to clarify who exactly was playin Fizzbin here

    hat tip to boxturtle

    or, more exactly, we need to find out how many different fizzbin players there are

    an on a personal note, I recently became the caretaker of two turtles, anybody got any care tips ???

  5. Minnesotachuck says:

    The SEC list doesn’t include our entry into the Corruption Contest here in Minnesota: Petters Worldwide, a supposed legitimate, up-and-coming conglomerate assembled by one Tom Petters. It included a number of legitimate businesses but it was exposed last September as essentially a Ponzi scheme. Petters was nabbed as he was trying to make arrangements for a private flight out of the country under a false identity. IIRC, Petters Worldwide was privately held, which probably explains why it wasn’t on the SEC list. The estimated take from the scam is estimated at between $2 and $3 billion.

    Among the recognizable brands under his control arewere Polaroid, Sun Country Airlines, and Fingerhut, all of which Petters picked up at fire sale prices when they were distressed. Here’s the search result for articles at the Star Tribune on Petters. More than you’ll ever want to know.

      • Minnesotachuck says:

        Weren’t there two in MN?

        I don’t recall another one recently, but if Sara said there was she’s probably right. I think she pays a lot more attention to things than I do. We’ve been following the Petters saga because my wife worked in advertising for Fingerhut for 22 years before the previous management pulled the plug and dumped 4000+ employees onto the street. The demise of the ‘hut should be an HBS case study for its toxic blend of arrogance, incompetence and subtle malfeasance. Petters then bought the brand (most likely, it now appears, with PonziBucks) and facilities and partially resuscitated it.

        • Sara says:

          “Weren’t there two in MN?

          I don’t recall another one recently,”

          The second one is a guy from Roseville, and he too is in Jail awaiting trial. Take was a little less than Petters. (Sorry, I can’t remember his name right now, but sooner or later it will emerge.)

    • Sara says:

      “The SEC list doesn’t include our entry into the Corruption Contest here in Minnesota: Petters Worldwide, a supposed legitimate, up-and-coming conglomerate assembled by one Tom Petters. It included a number of legitimate businesses but it was exposed last September as essentially a Ponzi scheme.”

      Well, the Irony is that Petters and Madoff had something in common, they both used a small boutique accounting firm in Bloomington for audit purposes. We’ll find out soon, Petters who is currently resident in the St. Paul Jail will be going on trial in about a month or so.

  6. freepatriot says:

    and in other news, norm coleman has managed to make Minnesota a national joke, with a little help from Jack Cafferty

    one of the best lines:

    counting isn’t Minnesota’s long suit. the land of 10,000 lakes actually has 11,842 lakes

    and my favorite:

    Now you know where all those retired election workers in Florida come from

    diaster accomplished ex-senator chicklets

  7. Minnesotachuck says:

    OT: NYT’s Dealbook blog tells us that the financial mess has gone nuclear:

    Is it time to add Lehman Brothers to the list of undeclared nuclear states?

    The failed investment bank, currently being wound down in bankruptcy protection, is apparently sitting on a big pile of yellowcake uranium — nearly enough to make a nuclear bomb, according to Bloomberg News.

    Before the company collapsed in September, it had just started dealing in the uranium commodity business and could have as much as 500,000 pounds of the radioactive stuff, the report said.

    Normally, an investment firm would close out any futures contracts it had on the uranium before taking delivery. But for reasons that are not explained — perhaps the chaos that ensued after the firm collapsed — the contracts were allowed to mature, requiring Lehman to take possession of the uranium.

    • scribe says:

      That’s what happens when you piss off the minions enough that they beat your CEO senseless while he’s working out in the company gym after announcing he’s crashed the company.

      A little negligence goes a long way, don’t it?

      Reminds me of a story – allegedly true – I heard while in the Army all those years ago. The not-so-liked company CO was required to sign on every supply requisition – no surprise, that. He’s known for not looking at what he’s signing. So, the supply clerk who’s getting ready to get his discharge and go home fills out a requisition form for “Tank, full tracked, 105 mm gun, M60A3, one each” and slips it into the deck of requisitions.

      A couple weeks go by and our clerk is home enjoying civilian life. A large tractor trailer pulls up in front of the company building and the guys start unloading a nice, shiny, new tank. “The one you ordered, sir. That is your signature on the requisition, isn’t it, sir?”

    • freepatriot says:

      can’t wait to see the congressional hearings on that one

      could you please explain why you bought “centrifuges are Us” after you took possession of the yellowcake

      well, Senator, that was actually an accounting error …

      • scribe says:

        Congresscritter: And your counterparty in those transactions was T.J. Houzhmanzadeh, Inc.?

        Bankster: Um, yes.

        Congresscritter: You realize the counterparty’s address was Teheran?

        Bankster: Um, we thought he was that guy who plays for the Bengals. We were managing investments for him. Teheran’s a Kentucky suburb of Cincinnati, isn’t it?

        • freepatriot says:

          objection, it isn’t the bank’s job to know where Fed Ex delivers somebody’s mail

          the committee would like to thank senator torturemann (idiot Connecticut/Israel) for that imput

  8. scribe says:

    Err, the SEC missed this one, but the US Attorney didn’t. Of course, NJ Affordable Homes was mortgages and real estate, as opposed to securities.

    But it was $80 mil, and so far 11 people have pleaded guilty.

  9. MadDog says:

    OT – From an interview Jane Mayer did this weekend with Alternet about the release of the ICRC Report:

    ‘These People Fear Prosecution’: Why Bush’s CIA Team Should Worry About Its Dark Embrace of Torture

    The New Yorker’s Jane Mayer discusses the fallout from the Red Cross’ shocking report on CIA torture and its serious legal implications.

    [snip]

    LS: Is there anything in the report in particular that has struck you that you didn’t know before?

    JM: One of the things that caught my eye last night was that it’s clear that the CIA — and I think you’d have to guess the Department of Defense — lied to the Red Cross. They told the Red Cross when it visited Guantanamo [in 2002] that it had seen all of the detainees. But what the report says is that some of the detainees — some of the high-value detainees — realized when they were finally sent to Guantanamo in 2006 that they’d been there before. They were there. And yet the Red Cross was not allowed to see them. The Red Cross was told they’d seen everybody.

    So the CIA and DOD lied to the Red Cross. There were some hidden prisoners in Guantanamo. That’s an overt act; lying to the Red Cross, hiding prisoners from them. So, that’s interesting to me…

        • emptywheel says:

          Oh, I’m sure she didn’t. (And besides, she didn’t make the same leap I did that they panicked after Abu Ghraib and the subsequent OLC battles with Goldsmith.)

          It’s just reinforcement that I wasn’t lost in insignificant weeds. Sometimes I do worry, you know.

          • MadDog says:

            It’s just reinforcement that I wasn’t lost in insignificant weeds. Sometimes I do worry, you know.

            We need to get you on Rachel Maddow’s show! Seriously!

            Spread the word Hotwheelers! EW on Rachel’s show or we’re not gonna watch any more.

            Oh, I’m sure she didn’t. (And besides, she didn’t make the same leap I did that they panicked after Abu Ghraib and the subsequent OLC battles with Goldsmith.)

            Which brings up a point I’ve been thinking about recently.

            With CIA Director Panetta’s announcement that the CIA will no longer operate its black sites “and has proposed a plan to decommission the remaining sites“, some might think that the US’s extraordinary rendition, detention and torturous interrogation policies are a thing of the past.

            Think again!

            If you think about it logically, by its very nature, our Government will always have in place policies and procedures for the detention and interrogation of terrorism suspects.

            If the CIA was to find Ayman al-Zawahiri tomorrow, there could be no doubt that they would try to both detain and interrogate him.

            So the logical questions arise of “where” and “how”.

            That CIA Director Panetta says that the CIA itself will no longer run black sites does not say that black sites run by others will not be used, and for our “benefit”.

            That CIA Director Panetta says the CIA itself will no longer use “enhanced interrogation techniques (torture), does not say that such methods by others will not be used, and for our “benefit”.

            And while our focus seems at times to only fixate on the ringleaders of these policies like Bush, Cheney, Gonzales, Addington, Yoo, Haynes et al, remember that there were (and are) thousands and thousands of worker bees at all levels of the DoD, CIA and other government organizations who made these policies happen.

            They too are invested in maintaining their freedom from criminal prosecution and imprisonment, and in many cases, they’re still employed throughout our Government.

            • Leen says:

              Yeah what is taking Rachel so long. Get Marcy on. Oh yeah folks might realize that her team pulls things off of Marcy’s blog and mind

  10. MadDog says:

    And another totally OT by way of Andrew Sullivan:

    Cheer Yourself Up

    A 47 year old homely matron shows up on Britain’s Got Talent … Seriously, I’m still choked up.

    And as one of Andrew’s readers writes:

    I watched Susan Boyle over and over today. I’m so moved by it… her voice is simply beautiful, of course, but she owned that stage. She knew she belonged there – where the hell did that assurance come from?

    I looked up her story: she was bullied terribly as a child, had or has a disability, has never been married, never been kissed, probably never been somebody’s most important person. After all that, and having just come out of serious depression on her mother’s death, what on earth gives her the confidence to get up there on the stage? Where did she find that courage?

    Simply marvelous!

      • skdadl says:

        Me too. That’s a genuine voice — she’s not belting or acting the song, as people who do show tunes often are; she’s singing from deep in the diaphragm, and she’s got everything down, inflection, pacing, doesn’t slide from note to note but meets each one smoothly.

        That could be part of her culture, and she’s probably been doing as much local singing in West Lothian as she could. So she was more ready than they thought, and man, she ambushed me.

        • rosalind says:

          when she gets to the line “I had a dream my life could be, so different from this hell I’m living”, I freakin’ lose it.

          and now to see how her future matches up with her dreams…

          • skdadl says:

            It was the perfect song for her to sing, eh? She knew, absolutely she knew what she could do with her voice, and then she picked that song.

      • MadDog says:

        I defy anyone not to be moved!

        Despite the tendency of the TradMed (and even all of us) to always see “the sky is falling”, there is still real goodness in people and in this world.

        Makes your day, don’t it?

  11. readerOfTeaLeaves says:

    Just up at TPM: someone in Congress wants to know how much AIG has been paying for expensive, highly shined-up bullshit PR.
    http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpoi…..hp?ref=fp3

    Maybe someone got cheezed at the news about Pig Missile Perino…?

  12. Leen says:

    ot Ew when the clip of the Chris Matthews, Frank Gaffney, David Corn wrestling match on Spain’s right to go after the Bush 6 comes up you are going to want to hear this one. This one will be all over the blogs tomorrow

  13. chrisc says:

    Some San Diego Chargers and Padres got scammed pretty bad back in the late 90s.

    It wasn’t a Ponzi scheme, but some kind of faith based, sports oriented fraud.
    A snake oil salesman named John W. Gillette Jr befriended a bunch of professional athletes including Junior Seau and Eric Chavez and got them to invest $11 in his company called “Pro Sports Management International”. They were going to build a waterpark in Poway. The athlete trusted Gillette because he led prayer meetings and had a picture of Jesus on his wall.

    Unfortunately for Seau and Chavez and the other investors, Gillette spent almost all of the money on himself. Gillette eventually plead guilty to 37 counts of grand theft and one of forgery and got 10 yrs in the slammer.

    I’m sure there is a lesson in this story. Give them another 10 yrs and they will forget about it and be vulnerable again. But right now, they are probably still wary.

    • Leen says:

      David Corn to Gaffney “Frank we’re you against the Nuremberg Trials”

      You go David

      Matthews blew a fuse ya hoo

      Chris Matthews ” my view, well my view is o.k. let me tell you my view of this Frank buddy I’ll tell you my view of this. We crossed that line in that West Point speech by President Bush George W. Bush up there in 2002 when he said we are going to go into other countries and kick ass because they do not have democracies in those countries that’s when he said we’re going to go kill
      people internationally because we do not like their form of government that’s when we crossed the line Frank”

    • MadDog says:

      I still can’t fathom why any self-respecting news organization could still be so far under the throes of wingnut worship, that they continue to host the wackiest of wingnut wackos like Frank Gaffney and provide them a public podium for their insane rantings.

      Why?

      I understand TradMed’s addiction to ratings in their pursuit of entertainment, but when in heaven does common sense prevail?

      It’s like the TradMed conducting an interview with the inhabitants of an insane asylum on their views of foreign policy, and trying with a straight face, to convince their viewers that, beyond any reasonable interpretation possible, that the crazy-person interviewees are “experts”.

      On what planet does TradMed live where they themselves can even swallow this bilge?

      • Leen says:

        I agree. It’s as if they want to rub salt in the public’s wounds Especially Rove. Steve Clemons debated Gaffney the other day

  14. prostratedragon says:

    Walter Bagehot, writing ca. 1873, near the end of his explanation of “Why Lombard Street Is Often Very Dull, and Sometimes Extremely Excited”:

    The good times too of high price almost always engender much fraud. All people are most credulous when they are most happy; and when much money has just been made, when some people are really making it, when most people think they are making it, there is a happy opportunity for ingenious mendacity. Almost everything will be believed for a little while, and long before discovery the worst and most adroit deceivers are geographically or legally beyond the reach of punishment. But the harm they have done diffuses harm, for it weakens credit still farther.

    When we understand that Lombard Street is subject to severe alternations of opposite causes, we should cease to be surprised at its seeming cycles. We should cease too to be surprised at the sudden panics. During the period of reaction and adversity, just even at the last instant of prosperity, the whole structure is delicate. The peculiar essence of our banking system is an unprecedented trust between man and man: and when that trust is much weakened by hidden causes, a small accident may greatly hurt it, and a great accident for a moment may almost destroy it.

    My emph. From Lombard Street: A Description of the Money Market. The whole chapter contains quite the catalog of historical bilge (though amazingly enough I think Mackay’s is even longer), including the ineffable stock offering “For an Undertaking which shall in due time be revealed” from the South Sea Bubble period.

  15. posaune says:

    ok guys, just home after long hard day.
    open fdl.
    say to hubby, “boy, is Marcy ever onto the bank & investment thing now.”
    hubby,” they’ll be sorry.”

    cheers all.

    • readerOfTeaLeaves says:

      From your keyboard to G-d’s eyes and ears.

      Do get a hankie before you click on MadDog’s wonderful linky.

      • posaune says:

        yeah, you need the hankie to watch Mad Dog’s linky.
        sort of a Seabisquit for humans. Where there’s a will, there’s a way. Amazin.

  16. nolo says:

    O/T — but NEWS, on dick cheney:

    dick will now be deposed,
    and stand civil trial, as early as
    september 11, 2009 (check irony of
    the date!)
    , for arresting steven
    howards in beaver creek, colorado, in
    2006 — when howards told the veep that
    he disagreed with the administration’s
    policies in iraq. his personal remarks,
    to the veep — who was doing a public
    meet-and-greet, were deemed cause for
    arrest.

    my, how times have changed. dick will
    likely settle with howards before trial, now.

    namaste

  17. MadDog says:

    More (minor) OT for us missing White House email junkies – From the National Security Archives comes word that: White House Agrees to Share Information in an Effort to Resolve Archive’s E-mail Lawsuit

    The plaintiffs and defendants in the pending lawsuit seeking restoration of millions of missing White House e-mails and the installation of an effective e-mail archiving system have agreed to stay the case so that the parties can discuss whether the matter can be resolved outside of litigation…

    Stay Motion here.
    Stay Order here.

Comments are closed.