Under Cover: The Targets of Stings

The NYT brought in Will Arkin (partnering with Eric Lichtblau) to talk about the proliferation of the use of undercover officials in government agencies. The Supreme Court, IRS, the Smithsonian, and DOD are all playing dress up to spy on Americans (and the IRS permits agents to pretend to be lawyers, doctors, clergy, and journalists).

The article makes it clear that — as might be imagined — the drug war is the most common focus of these undercover officers.

More than half of all the work they described is in pursuit of the illicit drug trade. Money laundering, gangs and organized crime investigations make up the second-largest group of operations.

But it doesn’t really step back and look at who else is getting targeted, which I’ve tried to lay on in this stable.

Screen shot 2014-11-16 at 12.07.12 PM

There are several concerning aspects of this list. I’m hoping the Smithsonian is using under cover officers solely to police the Holocaust and similar museums; the Holocaust museum, after all, has been targeted by a right wing terrorist recently. I might see the point on the Washington Memorial. But I do hope they’re no patrolling the Air and Space Museum because they might catch people who, like I did when I was in fifth grade, use the museum as a playground for stupid pre-teen drama while on a field trip.

DOD’s expanded use of undercover officers to target Americans is very troubling. The 9th Circuit recently threw out a conviction because the Navy had initiated the case searching data in the guise of protecting Spokane’s bases. I suspect, in response, the government will just get more assiduous at laundering such investigations. And it would be highly improper for them to do so clandestinely.

That said, this table is just as telling for what it doesn’t include as what it does.

If USDA is going undercover, why not send undercover inspectors to work in food processing plants, as a great way to not only show the food safety violations, but also the labor violations? Why not go undercover to investigate CAFOs?

The big silence, however, is about bank crime. While I’m sure SEC uses some undercover officers to investigate financial crime, you don’t hear of it anymore, since the failed Goldman prosecution. And we know FBI gave up efforts to use undercover officers to investigate (penny ante) mortgage fraud crime because, well, it just forgot.

But when DOJ’s Inspector General investigated what FBI did when it was given $196 million between 2009 and 2011 to investigate (penny ante) mortgage fraud, FBI’s focus on the issue actually decreased (and DOJ lied about its results). When FBI decided to try to investigate mortgage fraud proactively by using undercover operations, like it does terrorism and drugs, its agents just couldn’t figure out how to do so (in many cases Agents were never told of the effort), so the effort was dropped.

So it’s not just that Agencies are using undercover officers to investigate every little thing, including legitimate dissent, with too little oversight.

Its also that the government, as a whole, is using this increasingly to investigate those penny ante crimes, but not the biggest criminals, like the banksters. So long as the choice of these undercover operations reflects inherent bias (and it always has, especially in the war on drugs), then the underlying structure is illegitimate.

10 replies
  1. erichwwk says:

    “But it doesn’t really step back and look at who else is getting targeted, which I’ve tried to lay on in this stable.”

    You may well mean you’ve tried to “lay on in this stable.” On the other hand, it’s possible you meant “lay out in this table”.

    Since you referred to one of the most despicable of US censorship, the 1995 attempt (successful, from the POV of the AFA) –“the sabotaging of the attempt to bring some reality to the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki to the Smithsonian”>, the barnyard reference may be what you in fact meant.

    Keep up the good work. erich

    The greatest enemy of truth is very often not the lie – deliberate, contrived and dishonest – but the ” myth”> – persistent, persuasive and unrealistic. –JFK, June 11, 1962

  2. P J Evans says:

    The Smithsonian might also be doing it because of illegal collection and sales of artifacts – that’s a real problem (collection especially in the southwest; importation and sales everywhere).

  3. galljdaj says:

    When the Citizens catcher the Govt LYING, What happens?, well in my case. I got threatened with bodily harm(s) and when that didn’t work, with loss of all citizen rights! Now when the govt threatens us citizens with harms a right losses, that’s a crime! In my case case multiple agencies, in fact all, ignored the report(s) and the secret court(s) don’t exist to citizens, therefore there is no redress to Govt Crime!

Comments are closed.