Devin Nunes Will Let Dragnet Lapse So Mitch McConnell Can Save Face?!?!

NYT has a remarkable article describing how a number of hawks are willing to risk letting PATRIOT Act authorities lapse so Mitch McConnell can save face.

Senior lawmakers are scrambling this week in rare recess negotiations to agree on a face-saving change to legislation that would rein in the National Security Agency’s dragnet of phone records, with time running out on some of the government’s domestic surveillance authority.


If negotiators accept minor changes to the House bill, it will mark a significant retreat for Senator Mitch McConnell of Kentucky, the majority leader, and Senator Richard M. Burr of North Carolina, the chairman of the Senate Intelligence Committee.

Sadly, the NYT continues the typically credulous mainstream reporting on this topic. For example, Mitch McConnell never really wanted a straight reauthorization.

Mr. McConnell and Mr. Burr wanted a straight extension of the existing surveillance authority, although an appeals court judge ruled this month that such authority was illegal.

False. Burr revealed what they want Friday night. They want to move bulky Internet production back to NSLs. They want to expand the current dragnet to include Internet calls and even straight IP (and, oddly, documents!), and they want to expand it well beyond its counterterrorism focus to include all foreign intelligence. They want to criminalize whistleblowing about this law in particular. They want to eliminate all special privacy protections — over the standard NSA ones — for US persons.

And very importantly, they want to use the claim to need a 2-year transition period to finally obtain the authorities for NSA to conduct the bulk collection they actually want to do, in which place they’ll be well positioned to claim having the government retain the data is most efficient.

I could go on. But after Friday night no journalists with any self-respect should propagate Mitch’s “straight reauthorization” canard, which — it was clear over a month ago — was only ever a negotiating tactic.

NYT also falsely claims Burr wants just Lone Wolf and Roving Wiretap made permanent.

Mr. Burr wants the so-called lone wolf and roving authorities to be made permanent to avoid cliffhangers like the one Congress finds itself in now. The House bill would extend them to December 2019.

The title to that section of Burr’s bill reads,


And the language of it repeals both parts of both laws that include a sunset.

But the really absurd part of this story — and to be fair, NYT has to report these arguments as if they’re serious, and I should be grateful they have been recorded in all their absurdity — is that Burr and Nunes are now claiming that the largest phone companies in the US don’t know how to 1) store data, or 2) “search stored phone data after a warrant [actually, a Reasonable Articulable Suspicion order, not a warrant] is issued, then communicate the results to the government.”

The two men have said phone companies, which would collect the data instead of the N.S.A. under the USA Freedom Act, are not equipped to handle the task.


Leaders of the House Intelligence and Judiciary Committees from both parties, along with supporters in the Senate, said they could assuage the concerns of Senate Republicans by adding a certification process to ensure that telephone companies had developed the technology they needed to store the reams of data that were now gathered by the government. If the technology could not be certified, a longer transition period would kick in.

Mr. Burr said he would like that period to be two years, a proposal not very likely to be accepted by the House.

“The question is whether the technology can be developed in time, over a six-month window,” Mr. Nunes said in an interview. “I think it can be. I was at N.S.A. reviewing this 10 days ago.”

He added: “We believe six months works, but it wouldn’t be bad to have a little longer.”

But even that change has irked lawmakers, who worked for months on the compromise that passed the House. Representative Adam B. Schiff of California, the ranking Democrat on the House Intelligence Committee, said the technology in question — the ability to search stored phone data after a warrant is issued, then communicate the results to the government — was “a pretty minor deal” that could easily meet a certification deadline.

The men overseeing our intelligence community claim to not understand that phone companies store this information — and respond to lawful government requests for it — every day.

In truth, this is likely another ploy to expand the role of providers down the road (as happened under PRISM), after we’ve all become less vigilant — beyond simply providing phone records (as these silly Congressmen claim) to doing far more analysis.

After all, the only way these claims make sense, is if the government expects to get real pushback from providers going forward — and that’s not going to happen if all they want is call records delivered to the government, which telecoms have been doing forever.

So that’s the likely play: to set up some mechanism whereby the hawks can claim — in 6 months time — that telecoms are unwilling or unable (the same standard they use for drones killing!) to do what the government will ask. At which point we’ll be fighting to get the government out of an expanded dragnet business.

One more thing.

The Republicans also claim that the telecoms have been harassed by privacy advocates.

Republicans have also expressed a desire to protect the phone companies against harassment from privacy activists over their participation in a new surveillance program.

This is likely a bid to do something to shroud the dragnets (it won’t be just telecom going forward) in secrecy from here on out. Probably not the act-specific Espionage Act, like Burr wants, but probably some other means to ensure that no one ever gets standing to challenge what will still be an unconstitutional program going forward.

I guess they hope we won’t notice because we’re laughing at their other batty excuses so hard?

4 replies
  1. wallace says:

    quote”This is likely a bid to do something to shroud the dragnets (it won’t be just telecom going forward) in secrecy from here on out. Probably not the act-specific Espionage Act, like Burr wants, but probably some other means to ensure that no one ever gets standing to challenge what will still be an unconstitutional program going forward.”unquote

    Orwell must be envious, for not recognizing how traitorous Congressional Totalitarian wannabes legislate away the Bill of Rights. As for the NYT’s..fuck those lying bastards. AND McConnell/Burr. If ever there were authoritarian cocksuckers posing as “guardians” of our “security”, these two are the poster kids. What they don’t understand is, their grand-children’s grand-children will piss on their graves. I just wish someone had the balls to slap the shit out of them…and spit in their face.

    quote”I guess they hope we won’t notice because we’re laughing at their other batty excuses so hard?”unquote

    These fuckers don’t give a shit whether we notice or not. They’d stand on a corner with a sign selling their mother for 10 cents a fuck.

  2. orionATL says:

    the credulous new york times reporter was jonathan weisman.

    i think these half-reporters and their half-editors should be named and shamed.

    • A Reader says:

      I agree on naming names.
      One of my biggest complaints about how the Snowden docs are being released is that the names are always redacted. Name and shame IS REQUIRED to stop this. The culture of secrecy is what enables it to be as much of a cancer as it is.
      Does that maybe make people who develop offensive WMDs and surveillance technologies, including “offensive cyber”, targets? Then that’s a choice they should have considered when taking the job to begin with. Maybe nobody should be doing work for any government or company that punishes and destroys the freedoms of people if they aren’t willing to do so openly and be willing to face the judgment of their friends, neighbours, fellow countrymen and citizens of the world. Because it’s not just about the US, and if anything people outside the US, for now, are getting shafted even worse than those inside the US.
      Then again I also have a dream that some day all of these abusive manipulative sociopaths wind up going to prison for perjury and treason, so there’s that too on the list of “yeah, not gonna happen” — we were always screwed, but never more especially than now, and this entire period post-Clapper outright lying and getting away with it.

  3. wallace says:

    Meanwhile, it’s nice to see emptywheel laughing out loud at these scumbags in Congress while mocking their absurdity …

    from her twitter feed..

    quote”HAHAHAHAA! Bwahahaha! DiFi bill mandates IC agencies that have blown off requirement for privacy protections since Reagan to do so in 6 mos”unquote

    go potholewheel!

Comments are closed.