After Almost Six Years, FEC Reveals Identity of the Guy Who Asked for Guccifer 2.0’s Help to Beat David Cicilline

Before he defrauded a married couple out of more than $1.2 million dollars, Russell Taub got three reports from Guccifer 2.0 in an attempt to win a Congressional seat.

In a sentencing memo for two counts of violating the Federal Election Act by running fraudulent PACs, Taub claimed that his campaign against Rhode Island Democrat David Cicilline in 2016 was legal and ethical.

Russell has been a sincere part of the legitimate political process for the past several years. Indeed, he was the Republican Party candidate to represent Rhode Island in the United States Congress in 2016, and there has been no suggestion of any improper diversion of funds or similar financial impropriety during his campaign. He was defeated but he ran a clearly legal and ethical issues-oriented campaign.

(h/t UPBB for alerting me to this report on the disclosure.)

But an SEC judgement from last year unsealed in recent days reveals that Taub was the political candidate who solicited and obtained a dossier of information to use against Cicilline from Guccifer 2.0.

2. On August 15, 2016, Taub sent a Twitter direct message to Guccifer 2.0, asking: “Can you get a list of Republican donors for me. I am running for office myself.” Taub said, “I could use your help to defeat cicilline.” He further explained that a donor list would help to “raise some money to put against [Cicilline] . . . if I had the resources I can win.” Guccifer 2.0 replied, “it seems i have a dossier on cicilline . . . I can send u a dossier via email.” Taub then provided the email address, [email protected] for receipt of the dossier.

3. On August 17, 2016, “Guccifer2 <[email protected]>” sent an email to [email protected] with 10 attachments, all related to Cicilline, apparently stolen from the GRU’s various election-related hacking targets. Among the attached documents were three professionally-produced opposition research reports, polling data, news articles, and one of Cicilline’s U.S. House of Representatives Financial Disclosure Statements.

Because Taub had, as part of his 2019 plea on the fraud crimes, agreed to pay restitution to the donors he defrauded, the FEC deemed him unable to pay a penalty for soliciting a foreign donation, and closed the case.

What appears to have happened at the Commission is that, the FEC, which hadn’t had a quorum in Trump’s last years, took up a number of complaints pertaining to the Mueller investigation in 2021. At that point, in April 2021, the FEC still didn’t know who the candidate was. FEC then obtained more information (possibly from DOJ), which the General Counsel put together in a report.

It provided more details of the exchange, including a transcript of the DMs they exchanged.

About 15 minutes later, “Guccifer2 <[email protected]>” sent an email to [email protected] with a zipped file named “Cicilline_David.7z,” but Taub apparently could not open the documents in their compressed format,

Two days later, on August 17, 2016, [email protected] sent the files again but not in the compressed fo1mat.

The August 17, 2016 email from Guccifer 2.0 to Taub included 10 attachments, all of which were documents related to Cicilline, apparently stolen from the GRU’s election-related hacking targets. 28 Among the attached documents were three professionally produced opposition research reports on Cicilline. The first was a 206-page self-opposition “Research Repo1i” prepared by Walsworth Landset Research for “Team Cicilline,” which highlighted “vulnerabilities that Cicilline may encounter dming his re-election campaign in 2012.”29 It  provided an overview of Cicilline’s political career, described his voting patterns, and analyzed 2 Cicilline’s background and position on nearly three dozen major issues. The second was a 45- 3 page self-opposition research “Vulnerability Report” prepared for Cicilline for Congress by 3rd Coast Research in May 2010. 30 4 It analyzed “Top Attacks” against Cicilline on numerous issues 5 and provided in-depth background information about Cicilline. The report states that it is “an internal document and is not intended for public review or circulation.”31 6 The third is a 68-page 7 “Polling Memo,” dated April 26, 2010, apparently prepared for the campaign of Cicilline’s 2010 Democratic primary challenger, Bill Lynch. 32 8 The report summarizes Cicilline’s background 9 and provides commentary on where Cicilline might be vulnerable to attacks. 10

The remaining documents consist of three documents with polling data from the 2010 11 election cycle, including the results of a “Master Questionnaire” apparently conducted by The Feldman Group, Inc. on behalf of the Cicilline Committee in September 2010.33 12 There are also  news articles related to Cicilline and one of Cicilline’s U.S. House of Representatives Financial 2 Disclosure Statements. Russell Taub for Congress terminated in 2018.34 3 Following his bid for Congress, Taub 4 solicited donations to organizations he called Keeping America in Republican Control (“KAIRC”) and Keeping Ohio in Republican Control (“KOIRC”).35 5 On March 21, 2019, Taub 6 pled guilty to using these organizations to commit wire fraud in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 1343 and failing to file reports with the Commission in violation of 52 U.S.C. §§ 30104 and 30106.36 7 8 As part of his sentence, Taub was ordered to serve three years in prison and pay over $1.1 million in restitution to his victims.37 9 These activities were also the subject of MUR 7479 in 10 which Taub was a respondent; on March 9, 2021, the Commission dismissed the allegations as an exercise of prosecutorial discretion under Heckler v. Chaney, 470 U.S. 821 (1985).38

The FEC voted to revisit that decision in September, but stuck to the original decision.

What’s unclear is what DOJ ever did with this investigation.

Taub is almost certainly not among the referrals in the Mueller Report (the referrals are alphabetical, and the last one pertains to Roger Stone), though the the Report was completed after he had pled on the more serious fraud charges. While both the GRU indictment and the Mueller Report mention this exchange, neither includes a formal prosecutorial declination.

That said, it may be that a discussion of his solicitation of Guccifer 2.0 appeared in his sentencing memos.

There are several redacted paragraphs in the government sentencing memo describing the political harm his crime did, where his history (including criminal history) would normally be. His own memo describes that this is “his first serious offense,” though doesn’t describe what hte non-serious offenses were.

Curiously, while Taub’s memo describes trying to get a cooperation deal, the government memo describes that, “none of the information provided by the defendant ultimately proved useful or actionable.”

Mueller obviously had all the information implicating Taub in taking an illegal contribution from Guccifer 2.0 by July 2018, when he indicted the GRU. It was that same month that a former Secretary of the Navy whose name Taub was using in his fundraising sent him a cease and desist letter. The complaints to the FEC about Taub’s graft came in the next month, on August 16, 2018 (but may have been evident from the work Mueller did to understand Taub’s interactions with Guccifer 2.0). So it may well be that Taub’s prosecution for much more serious fraud supplanted any punishment for accepting help from Russia.

24 replies
  1. Ben Soares says:

    I wonder if he ran with Gen. Flynn. Rhode Island is a small place. Cranston is about 20 min from Newport.

    Little Rhody guy going all Russian info, then playing around in Ohio , odd.

    • Bay State Librul says:

      At least, it wasn’t Buddy Cianci, “the original avatar of our new politics, a creature composed mostly of bluff and bluster, a master of the media who mesmerized both press and public throughout his record 21 years as mayor of Providence, Rhode Island.”

    • emptywheel says:

      I wonder whether G2 asked him if he was from Rhode Island bc of Flynn, who was then the favorite to be NSA.

      Your OH point is a good one.

      • Savage Librarian says:

        Somewhere along the line I forgot that it was Rebekah Mercer who was responsible for picking Flynn for NSA. But I was reminded of that (in the 2nd from last paragraph) after reading this article again:

        “The Reclusive Hedge-Fund Tycoon Behind the Trump Presidency” | The New Yorker – Jane Mayer, 3/17/17

        “…Mercer made her influence felt. Her pick for national-security adviser was Michael Flynn, and Trump chose him for the job….”

        • Eureka says:

          Not sure if that article discusses this but recall Trump was considering Flynn for VP before he announced Pence.

          [NY Post broke that story early July 2016; WaPo did a ~’sources say _Trump_ is the impetus behind the potential Flynn nom (the whole military/general thing)’ shortly thereafter. But Flynn also had a book coming out mid-July, too (another reason for publicity).]

          Anyway, I’ve reflected recently on how effed indeed we might be were Flynn the Veep. Doubt we’d have made it to 1/6/2021, but had we — well, …

          [This is part of my koan on ~ “Is Putin ahead of schedule, or behind schedule?”, wrt Ukraine and his other ambitions.]

          • Savage Librarian says:

            I don’t remember if it mentioned the VP position for Flynn. But it did point out that Rebekah made several other recommendations that did not result in her preferred candidate being selected.

            So, it’s very possible that it was just coincidental that Flynn was her preferred choice for NSA. Others may have already made that decision. Jared has been quoted as saying that getting rid of Flynn was their biggest mistake. So, maybe it was more his choice and they just let Mercer think it was hers. Bannon may have had an opinion, too.

            • Eureka says:

              To be clear I wasn’t challenging the idea of Mercer having set up Flynn for NSA (or taking credit for it), was more wondering if Mayer or anyone else ever got an attribution on who put him in front of Trump’s face during the VP-selection era. [Could have been Rupert TV, for that matter — but as we all know, he doesn’t generally act in isolation, either.]

              The Mercers got Trump to dump Manafort for Bannon at a Hamptons party during the preceding relevant August weekend [as the story (MS)NBC carried goes].

              Of course by then Paulie couldn’t manage his underground and public-facing dual roles, besides that his loyalties were messier.

              Concordant with there always having been sundry RU/US oligarch-linked tentacles into Trump world, I think they (Mercers, e.g.) also preferred the yoked stability (lol, all things are relative) of, say, the Bannons and Flynns over someone deeper-in like Manafort and his uglier, more direct obligations to Russia-linked masters. Not to mention the obligations Manafort could — and would — create for _them_.

              The US money wanted more control on their side(s) of the equation(s), and to their degrees useful and sympatico we got folks like Bannon and Flynn as the *clean team* of treachors.

              I could totally see Mercers (esp. Rebekah: recall her pre-Parler “parlor game”) behind Flynn for VP, too. Whichever way, the “Flynn for VP” publicity all might have been to prime acceptance of Flynn’s future NSA (or any) admin role. Or to sell his ideologue books/twofer

              • Eureka says:

                FFS, remember Rudy was angling to be Trump’s Secretary of State. To our then horror and retrospective gratitude, we got Tillerson.

      • Leoghann says:

        Your connection of Rhode Island, Flynn, and Trump’s pick of him for NSA makes good sense.

        I have guess about Taub getting involved in Ohio Republican politics. Rhode Island has long been infamous for the intense corruption of its government and politics. But Republican politics in Ohio is running it a close second. Witness the indictment of Larry Householder, the now-ousted House Speaker, and others in 2020 in a $61M bribery conspiracy, as well as the reverence toward Jim Jordan and a few other screaming Magaturists. Taub may have seen financial opportunities available that were hard to find in Democratic controlled Rhode Island.

  2. WilliamOckham says:

    Even though 7-Zip is the best compression program, you should never send .7z files to noobs. 7-Zip can produce zip files and most anyone should be able to handle those. Also, I wanted to check on something. This <em> should not be in italics</em>

      • WilliamOckham says:

        HTML entities. I couldn’t remember if they worked properly in the WordPress comment box. They do! Makes it much easier to answer the questions about how to make your text italicized or bold, etc.

    • emptywheel says:

      IIRC .7z files were part of one of the conspiracy theories about file structure that Bill Binney and others were chasing.

  3. Eureka says:

    Why does Taub reply to G2’s Q about a PGP key with, “Sept 13, [email address]”?

    Is there an exchange missing from the DM transcript?

    ETA: I’m assuming that’s a deadline, September 13, 2016 was date of the primary.

    • WilliamOckham says:

      I initially assumed that Taub had replied with his PGP passphrase because that’s a thing that users do sometimes. However, “Sept 13” is too short for that (10 characters is the minimum length, as best I can remember). I guess it’s more likely he just ignored the pgp question.

  4. harpie says:

    Marcy just retweeted a tweet in this informative thread:
    5:42 PM · Feb 22, 2022

    Putin convened an unscheduled meeting with his Security Council in Moscow on Monday. The meeting was broadcast at 5 pm. But what time was it really held? Let’s look at some participants’ watches. Sergei Shoigu & Sergei Lavrov prep at 11:45. [THREAD]

    … Forrest Rogers…he who watches the watches!

  5. Marinela says:

    Did they investigate what Russell Taub paid in return for the help he got from Guccifer 2.0?
    And what was the plan if he’d won?
    How wide these schemes occurring in existing GOP and new candidates GOP?

Comments are closed.