Cardinal Cody, Cardinal Bernardin, and Pope Leo XIV
As a pastor, I and my clergy colleagues are shaped by a wide variety of forces, not the least of which is the situation in the world and the church at the time we attended seminary and were ordained for service in the church. As I look at all the news about the newly elected Pope Leo XIV, I can’t help but see how he was shaped by his early life in his tumultuous hometown of Chicago . . .
When the now-Pope Leo XIV was but Robert Prevost, a young Catholic boy, there were two major forces in his native Chicago. One was the legendary Richard J. Daley, the authoritarian Irish-Catholic mayor who ruled the city from the day Prevost was born until Daley’s death 21 years later. The other was Cardinal John Cody, the equally authoritarian ruler of the Archdiocese of Chicago from 1965 to 1982. When Cody was transferred from New Orleans to Chicago, stories were told that the local New Orleans priests sang the classic hymn Te Deum in celebration.
While the Second Vatican Council tried to push the Roman Catholic church into a more collegial mode of operation, Cody was among those who dug in their heels. It didn’t help matters that Cody was at the center of a double scandal – over a million dollars had disappeared from the church’s books, and his cousin/mistress/aunt’s step-daughter (the exact relationship varied depending on who you asked) Helen Dolan Wilson. She had followed him to his post in New Orleans, then to Chicago, receiving various small positions arranged by Cody and living in circumstances well beyond her seemingly meager financial resources. The Chicago Sun-Times published a blockbuster set of articles about Cody in late 1981, which included the revelation that the US attorney was investigating Cody and the Archdiocese. Cody fought it by delay and deflection, and succeeded insofar as he died the next year without having been formally indicted, and the investigation died with him.
Cody’s successor as Archbishop was Joseph Bernardin, who could not have been more unlike Cody. Where Cody was aloof, Bernardin was personable. Where Cody was autocratic, Bernardin was collegial. Where Cody pronounced, Bernardin discussed. Where Cody’s world was centered on the Catholic church, Bernardin was anxious to engage his ecumenical colleagues, as seen in 1989, when Lutherans and Roman Catholics in Chicago signed a groundbreaking covenant.
On May 13, 1989, the Metropolitan Chicago Synod of the Evangelical Lutheran Church and the Archdiocese of Chicago entered a historic covenant, the nation’s first such accord. The churches were brought together by their respective bishops at the time – Cardinal Joseph Bernardin and Bishop Sherman G. Hicks – to cooperate in ministry, to promote dialogue and collaboration on issues of faith and mutual concern, both theological and pastoral, and to deepen the unity existing between the two churches.
As a child, any Prevost family discussions about the church would have been filled with stories of Cardinal Cody. As a newly-ordained priest and member of the Augustinian order, Bernardin would have been equally prominent in family conversations. Even though Prevost would by this time have begun his ministry elsewhere, moving between Peru, Rome, and Chicago, it is hard to imagine that the epic contrast between Cody and Bernardin would not be part of his own self-understanding of what it means to be a priest.
Looking at the biography of the new pope posted by the Vatican News Service, it’s easy to see which model of ministry young Father Prevost chose to embody for himself. Four and a half years ago, Steven Millies, the head of the Bernardin Center, wrote an opinion piece in the National Catholic Reporter on the 25th anniversary of Bernardin’s death. Reading it today, it certainly appears to me that Bernardin was one to whom Prevost looked at with admiration:
In Bernardin, Catholics had a leader who anticipated the style and ministry of Pope Francis in his openness to dialogue and his efforts to engage the world in constructive conversations. But Bernardin’s final years also anticipated the sort of opposition Francis has faced, especially among American Catholics.
The seeds of our divisions, as Catholics and Americans, were being watered in 1996. As those seeds have blossomed and propagated in 2021, we can look back on Bernardin to understand what has happened and how things might be different.
Bernardin was the Roman Catholic archbishop of Chicago from 1982 until his death, but his importance stretched far beyond Chicago. No bishop in the U.S. could be associated more with the church’s efforts after Vatican II to engage and embrace the modern world as St. John XXIII had hoped when he called the council.
The title of Millies’ piece was “If we’d listened to Cardinal Bernardin, the Catholic Church would not be where it is today.” If the church at large had not listened to Bernardin, it is clear that the young boy, then young priest, and now Pope Leo listened to him.
And as the saying goes, a new pope may have to take the church as it is, but he doesn’t have to leave it that way — which may have been why Francis chose Prevost to head the Vatican office charged with recommending who should be named a bishop and which bishops should serve in which places. Francis had more than a few run-ins with bishops like Cody during his tenure (the name Raymond Burke comes quickly to mind), and had no desire to elevate folks who would follow Cody’s example. Francis chose Prevost to be the church’s servant in helping select its leadership for precisely this reason.
And when the cardinals in the conclave were looking for someone to lead the Roman Catholic church at its highest level, they appear to have confirmed Francis’ judgement. The church, they seemed to have said, needs more servant-leaders like Bernardin and Francis, and fewer autocrats like Cody and Burke.
As Francis might have put it, in Prevost, the cardinals selected a shepherd who smells like the sheep.
Thank you for this insightful post, Peterr. But did you mean Cody and Burke in the 2nd to last sentence? (I especially appreciate the last sentence!)
Thanks. Fixed.
I recall an anecdote from when Bernadin was in his second, fatal bout of pancreatic cancer. He had chosen his resting place in the Bishop’s Mausoleum in Mt. Carmel Cemetary, and noted that he would be in a spot a little to the left of Cardinal Cody, just as he was in life.
I’m 71 and he’s an American who is 69 years-old. He’s the only pope in my lifetime who would understand something my dad told me when I was nine or ten. “The pope walked into a meeting of cardinals and said ‘which one of you is Stan Musial?’”
[snerk]
He’s probably the first pope who would *get* that joke (and I’m old enough to remember Musial as a player).
Ha! I’m not Catholic, and never will be, but I love the reference; that was awesome. I am probably the least religious person on the planet, but if this new Pope irritates the MAGAsphere then I’m with him 100%. Give em’ hell, Leo.
Love it, thanks Alan.
p.s. I had my 9th birthday party at Stan & Biggies Restaurant and he was there that day! Great day!
Thanks Peter. Excellent context.
I’ll reiterate what I said in the O/T Leo thread in Marcy’s recent Tillis/Martin post (my comment there is in moderation at the moment):
My sister, former Catholic Worker and still very liberal, activist Catholic, said Prevost was her next best choice to Cupich (whom she mentioned several times yesterday in a family thread, prior to Prevost’s 2018 retweet of a Cupich anti-Trump, anti-family separation tweet becoming viral).
She said Leo is a strong reformer, but that he lacks people skills, and that he’s “spectrum-y,” in her observations of him. Her career was in early childhood development, and one of her sons is an astrophysicist who’s very much “on the spectrum,” so she wasn’t saying that as a diss, just an observation. It would be great to see Cupich become part of Leo’s Vatican team, as a spokesman maybe.
The volume of support Prevost got in very early voting tells me that the conservative Catholics are very much on the outs right now. They’re in about a 30+% minority. Yay!
I should have mentioned that Cupich was the bishop of our family’s hometown, Spokane, in the early ‘teens, so many of my sibs know him well, thus the partisanship I guess.
Me, I’m out in the hinterlands of agnathieism and a continent’s-width away, so I didn’t even know the first syllable of his last name was homophonic with “soup.”
“Leo the Fourteenth” doesn’t cut it for me, superficially, for some reason…sounds medieval, no? Again, my sis’ instinct led me to this Wiki entry:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pope_Leo_XIII
Could be a very interesting chapter upcoming in the saga of Catholicism.
Where did you see anything about the “early voting?”
My assumption was that he meant the early rounds of voting, after Conclave began. But how credible any of those stories are is a good question. No documents should have left the room. Cardinals were not meant to discuss it.
I was referring, inarticulately, to Prevost’s election in the relatively early going in the Conclave, after only one black smoke signal. IOW, this election didn’t take as long as many have in the recent past. That tells me that Francis’ legacy is looking pretty solid.
Thanks for this, Peterr.
What’s going to be interesting is to see how the press handles his heritage as a Creole of color on his mother’s side. (There was a reason she was such a good cook that all the local priests hung out at her kitchen.)
“Of color” is a maybe. But his mother has interesting ancestors, both Hispanic and French (New France, AKA Louisiana). Yes, the genealogists are busy.
There’s at least one person of color on his mother’s side – confirmed by census. (“Mulatto” and also a former slave)
Coming from a French Creole background, this makes me happy and hopeful.
Now if he put on a big crawfish boil, I might get down with the church.
Thanks, Peterr, for your reflection on the new Pope.
I enjoyed every word of your analysis.
Posting mostly for followup commentary.
I believe that Opus Dei has followers associated with Project 2025:
https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/article/2024/jul/26/kevin-roberts-project-2025-opus-dei
Dunno how bad and deep that is.
I do not recall, not see, where Any Coney Barrett is associated with Opus Dei and I think ,in part, Opus Dei is particularly a male oriented thing.
But I am open to being better dictated.
I wonder how much, if any, influence Pope Leo might have on Opus Dei. It does not have to be direct influence per se.
Then there are his “corrective comments” on Vance’s and Trump’s
takes on Christianity:
https://www.politico.com/news/2025/05/08/pope-leo-tweets-social-media-00337322
I just don’t know how persuadable the USA based Catholic population is.
I am a former Catholic still in recovery (not abuse related).
There’s a 4-part Spanish-language documentary about Opus Dei on Max called “How I Left the Opus Dei”. Basically they recruited vulnerable tween-age girls, and groomed them to be obedient servants to powerful patriarchal male leaders in the group. Classic abusive cult stuff, including the requirement of wearing painful “mortification” undergarments.
The founder of Opus Dei, Father Josemaria Escriva, was a Spanish Catholic priest who founded the organization in 1928, and was a fanatical nutbag who died in 1975 and now regarded by many in the organization as a saint. They live on as a large and influential group, with 4 successors heading them up since Escriva’s death, and their relationship to the orthodoxy of the Catholic church is, shall we say, interesting…
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_Opus_Dei
It could be accurately (for the most part) said that Opus Dei was to Franco as Project 2025 is to Trump.
It’s not just folks in the organization who view Escriva as a saint. He was canonized by John Paul II on October 6, 2002. He is officially a saint of the Catholic church, though there are folks who question the process by which he was declared to be a saint.
Ouch! There’s analogy to to be made comparing JP2 canonizing Escriva and SCOTUS granting Trump immunity…
The Max Opus Dei doc also showed how severely these girls were treated, including “standard” harsh cult techniques like censoring mail, limiting or forbidding contact with family, limiting amount of cash they could carry around, monitoring phone calls with family when such calls were allowed, being made to confess misbehavior for minor mishaps etc. etc. They preyed on poor but religious Spanish, Mexican, Central American (and some British) families to give up their daughters to join them for a better and more religiously righteous lifestyle.
And then Benny made JP2 a saint, without going through the entire process.
ACB is a charismatic Catholic, https://www.theguardian.com/us-news/2020/sep/26/amy-coney-barrett-supreme-court-donald-trump-people-of-praise.
That’s a much unlooked-at segment of the Catholic Church. There’s cross-pollination between that sect (if you can call its disparate factions a sect) and protestant Pentacostalism (which is also a soup-to-nuts aggolmeration) — but they don’t commune with each other, organizationally at least. I’m guessing there’s a similar paucity of cross-pollination between them and Opus Dei, who are hyper traditionalists, and anti-feminist to boot. Barrett’s sect is also very sexist, but her behavior on the bench can’t be labeled as such, I don’t think. I would expect her to rule against Project 2025’s control, such as it can be established, of various govt agencies.
I actually had contact with a fragment of that Catholic pentacostal movement in the mid ’70s in Western OR. Watched a nun perform a “cleansing” of my Aunt & Uncles house. They had to toss a lot of hard liquor. Wine was fine, though. They tried to get my great-aunt Mimi, an octogenarian in the beginning stages of dementia, to speak in tongues. That was a revolting thing to watch.
More Protestant than Catholic, in that way – speaking in tongues isn’t a Catholic thing, and it isn’t what they claim it is.
There’s Latin.
My folks lived in South Bend, and my mother was a grad student at Notre Dame in the early 70s. She was close to several women theologians at St Mary’s College, and together with them attended several services conducted by a Pentecostal Sect at Notre Dame. She described it to me as an attempt to recreate the spirit of the early Church. She was still very devout at that time, but she had a low tolerance for that sect, and quit after a vew visits. I have always assumed that the sect Barrett belongs to had its roots in that group.
Interesting, re: Catholic pentecostal movement. I saw the same thing take place in my parents’ Catholic diocese in NY during the 70’s — laying-on of hands by wild-eyed enthusiasts, glossalia, the cleansing of homes of Satan’s works, and the proliferation of groups dedicated to the Tridentine Mass. It all seemed clearly to be a visceral negative reaction to Vatican II and Roncalli’s call for the Church to open itself to the world in a pastoral rather than political sense, to turn the altar toward the congregation, perform the Mass in the local language, to engage in ecumenical movements in cooperation with other Christian faiths, and so on. (He also prohibited Italian bishops from interfering with local elections, a message the Irish bishops didn’t get for another thirty years.)
Yup, my experience in OR was in the mid ’70s. My aunt and uncle were hyper conservative Catholics in every respect except for their pursuit of “the gifts of the Spirit,” which is a sidebar of protestant dispensationalism.
By “her behavior on the Bench,” I was referring to, in large part, her willingess to buck the male members’ decrees and objections, sometimes with Roberts sometimes just her and the three other ladies. I just wanted to clarify that I wasn’t overlooking her vote in Hobbs as an indication of her “sexism quotient.”
She’s like Francis and probably Leo XIV in that regard: more liberal than expected, but really convinced that all abortion is murder. Still, she’s closer to O’Connor than to, say, Kavanaugh IMO.
“Catholic pentecostal” strikes me as a contradiction in terms.
Francis worked to defang Opus Dei, which has support among a lot of right-wing Catholics. I have a vague recollection that Francis did something about a church the Opus Dei leaders had built, but I can’t find it in a quick search. Maybe Peterr has a better feel for this. The Chicago Pope was not in Rome when this was done, but I assume he agrees with Francis about the group.
I’m not familiar with Francis doing something about an Opus Dei church building, but he did do a number of things to rein in OD, including making it clearer that they were subject to the local diocesan bishop in their work, that their head could not be a bishop, moved oversight from the Vatican’s Office of Bishops to the Office of Clergy, and that the statutes of the organization had to be approved by the Vatican.
Whether this was done by Francis to protect OD from those who criticized them for their relative independence or done to cut down on their independence is a matter of dispute.
Thanks for this post, Peter. Helpful and interesting. I wonder what Leo will do with Opus Dei. It sure needs to be done with.
Thank you for this.
Is any one else surprised that the RW mediasphere hasn’t concocted a “Conclave vote-theft” explanation for Leo’s ascendancy?
Thank you Peterr your post reads like an intriguing novel with millions of dollars disappearing from the church’s books and Helen Dolan Wilson as Cody’s cousin/mistress/aunt’s step-daughter. He wouldn’t be the first to have a mistress violating vows.
Yes indeed, “the cardinals selected a shepherd who smells like the sheep.”
Peterr, I loved your article, as did my wife
I was born in 1954 and my wife in 1955. We went to the same Catholic school as children. We both remember Pope John the XXIII and Vatican II.
These days, she is a devout Catholic and I’m not a believer. That said, I recognize the social structure churches provide—if a church near me burned down, I’d want to contribute to a rebuilding fund; I’m not anti-religion. Still, given our belief systems, my wife and I want different things from this Pope.
She was overcome with emotion that she had lived to see an American Pope. She. wanted a Pope like Francis, and apparently, she’s got one. I, too, wanted someone like Francis, in tone and empathy, but I also want a muckraker, not simply a humble man showing us how to treat others. The Catholic Church has had many scandals over the years. Now, with stories of nuns abused by priests, they have another. If there are not fundamental changes and some serious investigations, men abusing women will continue.
Peace to you and your wife, both.
Tyler Pager at the NYT:
*sigh*
The job of Leo XIV is not to offer anyone a vision of US values, but to offer a vision of Christian values, of divine values. Viewing Leo as an American (meaning USA! USA! USA!) first and Pope second is a serious mistake.
NYT lost its way years ago. It’s just gotten more lost as it tries to satisfy The Felon Guy and his associates.
Yes, that last bit about the new pope and Christian values. I watched several clips of “news” and late night shows reporting (?) on the new pope. Yes, I got that USA, USA vibe and some disrespect with some calling him Pope Bob.
Lastly, they all seem to overlook his dual citizenship in Peru where he has spent a large part of his life.
I’ve seen clips where older priests who have known Prevost for a long time slip up and call him “Bob”, then openly admit it’s hard to make the change to Leo, having called him Bob for decades.
I haven’t seen any media folks (reporters, anchors, analysts) call him Bob.
Sad that your point, well taken, needs to be made.
From Massimo Gramellini, a columnist in the Italian Corriere Della Sera (using the Firefox translation widget to get from Italian to English):
It will, indeed.
Oof. Corriere nailed Trump’s revolting narcissism succinctly.
We have now two Leo figures, the Pope and Leonard. Francis took a hands-on approach to the Knights of Malta, and my guess is Leo will carry over that attention. Burke and Leonard Leo seem twin sons of different mothers.
At 69 years of age Pope Leo seems to have time to make a legacy. I expect it to be a sound one. Last agreeing with others, TY for the time the post took, and the bio link.
A postscript – I’d call Leo XIV a second New World Pope, since like Francis, he has roots in South America. And of course in Chicago. But that bypasses “first American Pope” attention and looks more at the total person. Vatican News has reported he is the first Augustinian to reach the Papacy, Augustine is JD’s patron Saint, and JD was the last major political figure outside of Vatican officials to see Francis alive. Not that there’s any real insight or connection, but it is a coincidence trifecta hard to forget once you’ve heard or noticed it.
Francis was the first Jesuit as Pope, now an Augustinian. The Vatican is moving on.
May 8, 2025
1:15 PM CNN:
1:22 PM William Shakespeare, Bard of Bluesky:
https://bsky.app/profile/shakespeare.lol/post/3looggptsgs2f
May 8, 2025 at 1:22 PM
Peterr, I’m encouraged by your writing and hope that the Pope Leo XIV continues the liberalizing direction of Pope Francis. He certainly appears to be a genuine man of the people.
I couldn’t help but observe that radical catholic activist Leonard Leo might be happy that his name has been elevated along with the new Pope. As well, his lackey and RV beneficiary Clarence Thomas, who has mounted a crusade against due process outlined in the 14th amendment which will surely come under further attack during Pope Leo XIV’s reign, must have also noticed the coincidence.
Let’s hope it’s just that.
His selection was politically brilliant. Anti Catholic sentiment is foundational in the religious/political beliefs of American Protestants of many denominations.. It’s a foundation of that sort of ‘Christian Conservatism’ that Catholics may not be loyal to America. The Catholic church is universal after all. In turn their Christianity assumes America is the central in the culmination of God’s plan. Thus giving you, the ordinary schmuck, a special place in the Universe. Part of some grand drama your playing a part in. People understandably like this.
Already the non Catholic nor particularly religious shouters are getting on board with this not loyal stuff. Meanwhile the well suited and positioned Catholic elites, the Barr’s and Leo’s and Gorsusch’s, nor their little bros, Vance or Douthat, don’t have the balls to go even half MAGA on the Pope. What are they to do? Grumble I suppose. Schism unlikely.
PS: So in GR I was driving down 28th and the CRC headquarters was gone! It’s gone!
Good comment. Years of quality education at OLQM in Beverly Hills cured me of organized religion – but the learning stuck and has served me well.
And yes – the Fundies and Evangelicals (not sure if ‘all fundies are evangelical, but not all evangelicals are fundies’ is a true statement.) are sure to get their panties in a wad al a JFK – they need to get a grip.
Organized religion is politics IMHO (as opposed to faith) so of course those who represent their personal views as facts and news will be frothing – catholic or no.
Old Rapier – your comment on the CRC issue brought back an old chestnut – former IBEW member here and with a chip on my shoulder way back when. Work was good but there was always something better on the horizon when we got a case of the red ass*:
My ass is red, my money is green –
And there’s lot of this country that I haven’t seen.
So get my money – and my toolie’s too –
‘Cause their working 6 – 12’s in Kalamazoo!
*Def. 1: https: //slangdefine.org/a/a-case-of-the-red-ass-11a.html
Yeah yeah yeah – Grand Rapids, I know – but Kalamazoo Ave.
Thanks!
Prelates in the church sometimes seem to forget that Jesus conducted His ministry as a rabbi first, not an administrator and reached out to everyone (including tax collectors). While the church needs both to be effective in its work, it’s had more trouble when it went to being overly organized into conformity. That’s why Francis and Leo are a vast improvement over John Paul II and Benedict.
Will never see the like of an SJ papacy again but an Augustinian and the attendant call to service and community may prove a balm to the world
FYI — My local paper in today’s edition includes a New York Times (today’s, I assume) article by Ruth Graham touching on what is discussed above re Catholic Church “ideologies.”
Thanks Peterr.
A bit facetious perhaps but am I the only one who thinks Leo XIV bears more than a passing resemblance to Joe Pesci? I can hope that SNL picks up on that and has him a a Host.
Icing on the cake would be to have Don Novello return as Father Guido Sarducci with Pesci.
https://www.nbc.com/nbc-insider/father-guido-sarducci-snl-pope-don-novello
Colbert had Father Sarducci on last week.