FISC Rules that [Redacted] Is Not Subject to FISA 702 for One of Its Services
Some company successfully argued that, under FISA 702, if they don’t have access to your data, they can’t be compelled to provide US spooks assistance to get to it.
If you are not happy with the results below please do another search
Some company successfully argued that, under FISA 702, if they don’t have access to your data, they can’t be compelled to provide US spooks assistance to get to it.
There’s a physical search FISA order released with the FISA 702 one that sounds like it pertains to a cybersecurity application.
My Modest Proposal to fix the FISA 702 impasse is to require the FBI to obtain probable cause warrants for the target of surveillance — possibly from the FISA court — for data they want to search.
Until 2018, the FBI did back door searches, including on FISA material, before they made someone a Confidential Human Source. That likely included Igor Danchenko.
If there was an unredacted copy of the fourth FISA application targeting Carter Page in the stash of documents Donald Trump stole from the White House, it would amount to a separate violation of FISA, on top of any exposure under the Espionage Act.
Trump stored signals, human, and FISA intelligence in a storage room in his spy-targeted resort.
In substantiating the case that Carter Page was wrongly aggrieved under FISA thanks to rumors passed along by Igor Danchenko, Durham appears to have similarly made Danchenko aggrieved himself. And that may help him defend himself in ways that would not otherwise be available.
According to the Statement of Offense to which James Wolfe — the former Senate Intelligence Committee security official convicted of lying about his contacts with journalists — allocuted, Carter Page suspected Wolfe was the source for Ellen Nakashima’s story revealing Page had been targeted with a FISA order. When the former Trump campaign staffer wrote […]
In addition to the problems regarding still unresolved problems with FBI back door searches, the recently released FISA opinion suggests that as Director of National Intelligence, John Ratcliffe approved a step that might make it easier to unmask US person identities in FISA reports.
By chance of logistics, the same judges who presided over the two decade war on Islamic terror are presiding over the cases of more than 60 January 6 defendants. That has already