John Hoeven

GOP Brought in Guy Who Authorized Dragnet to Talk Dragnets

I’m far more alarmed by this tidbit in the latest report on the fight over USA F-ReDux than many who are commenting on it.

McConnell’s presser came following Senate lunches, during which former Attorney General Michael Mukasey, who served under George W. Bush, briefed Republicans on the importance of the surveillance authorities. While defending the NSA’s phone-records dragnet, Mukasey did say a recent federal appeals court deeming the program illegal could complicate McConnell’s efforts to renew the Patriot Act without changes, given the legal uncertainty that could result, according to two senators present.

“He did recommend some acknowledgment of the decision so that it is addressed in the legislation,” Sen. John Hoeven, a North Dakota Republican, said.

The Republicans sat down to talk about dragnet surveillance and they brought in Michael Mukasey, who not only presided over the expansion of Stellar Wind in the form of FISA Amendments Act, but authorized SPCMA after some previous DOJ officials appear to have refused to.

SPCMA, you’ll recall, is the authority to contact chain on US-person metadata collected under EO 12333 that current FBI General Counsel James Baker refused to authorize in an earlier position at DOJ in 2006 but which Mukasey signed in early 2008 (and DOJ then promptly hid from FISC as it was considering whether the contact chaining that provided particularly under PRISM was constitutionally sound). The actual authorization for it languished for several months, half-signed, before Mukasey signed it in the early part of his tenure as Attorney General.

There is reason to believe SPCMA — that is, Internet data collected overseas, in addition to telephone metadata — is where a lot of the Internet chaining currently occurs, with almost none of the controls (or subject limitations) that existed under the PATRIOT-Authorized Internet dragnet. There is also reason to believe that USA F-ReDux envisions the government federating queries of metadata collected under its new Call Detail Record function with SPCMA data. Finally, I suspect that the Second Circuit decision on Section 215 may have repercussions for SPCMA as well.

In other words, I find it fairly alarming that GOP brought in Michael Mukasey and his advice was to make a nod to the Second Circuit even while talking about why the authorities — plural — were important.

Which is to say I don’t think his acknowledgment that Courts are Courts is very comforting, given that he appears to recommend sustaining existing “surveillance authorities” in current bulk form.

Lisa Murkowski Admits She Voted To Help Catholic Church Enforce a Doctrine She Ignores

As I noted last week, every single Catholic Senator save Susan Collins who voted for the Blunt Amendment last week appears likely to have relied on the birth control their Church prohibits to limit the size of their families. Lisa Murkowski, who has just 2 kids, was among the 10 Catholics who was using her position to help the Catholic Church enforce a doctrine she herself has ignored.

And in an interview claiming she now regrets that vote, Murkowski as much as admits that’s what she did. (h/t TPM)

What Lisa Murkowski told me I already suspected. She’s a moderate. She supports abortion rights and contraception coverage. She also doesn’t line up completely with the Catholic Church when it comes to birth control. She regretted her recent vote.

[snip]

I pointed out that her support for birth control conflicts with the Catholic mandate against it.

“You know, I don’t adhere to all of the tenets of my faith.

Now, she’s still spinning her vote (and her letter opposing Obama’s rule on contraception) as one in favor of religious freedom.

She’d meant to make a statement about religious freedom, she said, but voters read it as a vote against contraception coverage for women.

But it is not “religious freedom” to craft laws to help the Church enforce mandates that almost none of its adherents–and probably few, if any, of the Catholic Senators supporting the law–abide by. It is an improper use of government to aid a religious institution.

Not to mention, rank hypocrisy.

Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel @csoghoian Here's a transcription of Chertoff's virtually identical comments at Aspen. https://t.co/V7m0NGmyOk @tdaxp
41mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @AdamSerwer And in places like bumfuck MI, where there are no lines, they give it to select people for free.
49mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Scooter Libby presented as poster child for criminal justice reform, not any of the millions actually in prison. http://t.co/s0g5lYQH6v
51mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Has anyone checked the oversized compounds in Abbottabad to see if Mullah Omar is holed up in any of them, pretending to be dead?
56mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @TeresaKopec Definitely a thug. @AdamSerwer
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @downwithtyranny It's also just crap analysis.
1hreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV @emptywheel Sounds like he's been listening to the bogus claims of a coming Mini Ice Age.
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @JimWhiteGNV If it's any consolation the only thing my dog appears to hear well anymore is the ice machine, which as a result terrifies him
3hreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV Heh. We are taking out a dead pine tree. You should have heard the high-pitched scream from our horse when the tree hit the ground.
3hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @jason_koebler That's what Tom Brady said. And Goodell busted him for it. @derektmead
3hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Countering Violent Extremi--um, Use of Guns that works? http://t.co/YsH7Arsnon
3hreplyretweetfavorite
July 2015
S M T W T F S
« Jun    
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031