<?xml version="1.0"?>
<oembed><version>1.0</version><provider_name>emptywheel</provider_name><provider_url>https://www.emptywheel.net</provider_url><title>The Bates Decision: A Question Unasked And Unanswered - emptywheel</title><type>rich</type><width>600</width><height>338</height><html>&lt;blockquote class="wp-embedded-content" data-secret="dwnTq0xiRw"&gt;&lt;a href="https://www.emptywheel.net/2008/08/17/the-bates-decision-a-question-unasked-and-unanswered/"&gt;The Bates Decision: A Question Unasked And Unanswered&lt;/a&gt;&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;iframe sandbox="allow-scripts" security="restricted" src="https://www.emptywheel.net/2008/08/17/the-bates-decision-a-question-unasked-and-unanswered/embed/#?secret=dwnTq0xiRw" width="600" height="338" title="&#x201C;The Bates Decision: A Question Unasked And Unanswered&#x201D; &#x2014; emptywheel" data-secret="dwnTq0xiRw" frameborder="0" marginwidth="0" marginheight="0" scrolling="no" class="wp-embedded-content"&gt;&lt;/iframe&gt;&lt;script type="text/javascript"&gt;
/* &lt;![CDATA[ */
/*! This file is auto-generated */
!function(d,l){"use strict";l.querySelector&amp;&amp;d.addEventListener&amp;&amp;"undefined"!=typeof URL&amp;&amp;(d.wp=d.wp||{},d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage||(d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage=function(e){var t=e.data;if((t||t.secret||t.message||t.value)&amp;&amp;!/[^a-zA-Z0-9]/.test(t.secret)){for(var s,r,n,a=l.querySelectorAll('iframe[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),o=l.querySelectorAll('blockquote[data-secret="'+t.secret+'"]'),c=new RegExp("^https?:$","i"),i=0;i&lt;o.length;i++)o[i].style.display="none";for(i=0;i&lt;a.length;i++)s=a[i],e.source===s.contentWindow&amp;&amp;(s.removeAttribute("style"),"height"===t.message?(1e3&lt;(r=parseInt(t.value,10))?r=1e3:~~r&lt;200&amp;&amp;(r=200),s.height=r):"link"===t.message&amp;&amp;(r=new URL(s.getAttribute("src")),n=new URL(t.value),c.test(n.protocol))&amp;&amp;n.host===r.host&amp;&amp;l.activeElement===s&amp;&amp;(d.top.location.href=t.value))}},d.addEventListener("message",d.wp.receiveEmbedMessage,!1),l.addEventListener("DOMContentLoaded",function(){for(var e,t,s=l.querySelectorAll("iframe.wp-embedded-content"),r=0;r&lt;s.length;r++)(t=(e=s[r]).getAttribute("data-secret"))||(t=Math.random().toString(36).substring(2,12),e.src+="#?secret="+t,e.setAttribute("data-secret",t)),e.contentWindow.postMessage({message:"ready",secret:t},"*")},!1)))}(window,document);
/* ]]&gt; */
&lt;/script&gt;
</html><description>First off, a mea culpa. I thought Judge Bates would mostly refuse to get involved in the contempt issue at this point, which he easily could have done. I was wrong. That said, the dark hats of Miers, Bolten and Bushco predictably want to delay until the next of never on the appeal. But the white hats of Conyers' House Judiciary Committee have a response to that. And there is another facet to this equation that has been bugging me. Despite how good Bates' decision is, why did it not address the refusal by the DOJ to prosecute a duly constituted and valid on it's face contempt citation referred by the United States Congress?</description><thumbnail_url>https://www.emptywheel.net/wp-content/uploads/2016/10/Web-backup.jpg</thumbnail_url><thumbnail_width>448</thumbnail_width><thumbnail_height>448</thumbnail_height></oembed>
