Michigan Dems and the Obama Campaign Sue for Foreclosure-Related Vote-Caging

The Michigan Democratic Party and the Obama campaign just finished a conference call announcing that they will sue the Republican Party for its plans to conduct vote-caging operations this fall, based partly on using lists of people in foreclosure to challenge peoples’ right to vote (here is Time’s recording of the call). They are seeking an injunction to prevent the GOP from engaging in these activities this year.

The move arose out of a Michigan Messenger story last week which quoted a county party chair, on the record, as saying he planned to use foreclosure lists as a basis for vote-caging.

The chairman of the Republican Party in Macomb County, Michigan, a key swing county in a key swing state, is planning to use a list of foreclosed homes to block people from voting in the upcoming election as part of the state GOP’s effort to challenge some voters on Election Day.

“We will have a list of foreclosed homes and will make sure people aren’t voting from those addresses,” party chairman James Carabelli told Michigan Messenger in a telephone interview earlier this week. He said the local party wanted to make sure that proper electoral procedures were followed.

State election rules allow parties to assign “election challengers” to polls to monitor the election. In addition to observing the poll workers, these volunteers can challenge the eligibility of any voter provided they “have a good reason to believe” that the person is not eligible to vote. One allowable reason is that the person is not a “true resident of the city or township.”

The Michigan Republicans’ planned use of foreclosure lists is apparently an attempt to challenge ineligible voters as not being “true residents.”

When asked whether they had more evidence that the GOP planned to engage in this kind of voter-caging this year, MDP Chair Mark Brewer and Obama Campaign General Counsel Bob Bauer referred to the changing story among different members of the MI GOP–that stop short of real denials, of similar statements coming from an OH county chair, and of a former MI Republican Counsel, Eric Doster, admitting the party did plan on doing vote caging, though perhaps using returned mail.

The campaign explained the goals of their suit this way:

The complaint filed today seeks declaratory and injunctive relief to challenge the “lose your home, lose your vote” vote-suppression program adopted by the Macomb County Republican Party, in concert with the Michigan Republican Party and the Republican National Committee, as well as unnamed Defendants who will implement the scheme at polling places in Macomb County and throughout the State.  This “lose your home, lose your vote” program is part of a broader scheme – misnamed an “election integrity” program – to harass voters and suppress the vote throughout the State of Michigan in the upcoming election on November 4.

Here’s a copy of the complaint.

One more thing: Someone asked about the potential scope of this practice. Mark Brewer noted that in July there were 11,000 homes in MI alone that were considered to be in foreclosure. Brewer also pointed out that many of the people on these lists in MI were still in their homes. So when you consider the possibility they’ll use foreclosure lists going back some time, you see how many people in MI this could affect.

I’ll update this story with more details shortly.

For the moment, though, know that the MDP adn the Obama campaign are treating GOP plans for vote-caging as a “national and systematic program” that they will fight seriously.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

0 Responses to Michigan Dems and the Obama Campaign Sue for Foreclosure-Related Vote-Caging

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71
  • 72
  • 73
  • 74
  • 75
  • 76
  • 77
  • 78
  • 79
  • 80
  • 81
  • 82
  • 83
Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz RT @normative: The "if we'd had it on 9/11" argument for bulk collection may be the most offensive. You really have to assume people are st…
14mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz None whatsoever. Politico too quite clearly RT @armandodkos No denying NYT is open war with Hillary Clinton right?
37mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @BernardKingIII There is SOOOOO much more involved in this than petty little Elon Musk's craven desire for unfair advantage.
40mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @BernardKingIII Also, local auto dealerships, both through sales+advertising are arguably leading driver of local economies.
41mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @BernardKingIII Benefits actual customers who have factory parts+service available in their region/territory. That one of original purposes
41mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @emptywheel: Everyone should take this test. As someone who has taught The Trial and knows a bit abt FISC I did horribly. http://t.co/Sn
44mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @emptywheel I got only seven, but I think one of the explanations is not necessarily right, so counting as eight.
44mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV Getting excited. Headed to San Diego Monday to spend a week as a meeting spouse. Been 19 years since I was there. Food recs needed.
46mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @emptywheel: Implicit in Burr's expansion plan is House leaders would pull a fast one during "recess" to extend PATRIOT UNTIL June 1 (or…
47mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @OKnox @armandodkos @anitakumar01 You don't understand, this time it will be turned up to ELEVEN https://t.co/AHcV2ki3FK
49mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz What is the surveillance reform debate really about? Overview: https://t.co/9P0mRNKFdp Detailed specifics: https://t.co/jIUVbvBXwV
52mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Yesterday Lynch was lying, directly contrary to her own IG's exhaustive report, about the program's efficacy https://t.co/5HpBn5oyeT
58mreplyretweetfavorite
September 2008
S M T W T F S
« Aug   Oct »
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
282930