Holder Announces the Investigation

And notes some will be unhappy that he has initiated the review. But doesn’t consider those of us who smell a whitewash.

I have reviewed the OPR report in depth. Moreover, I have closely examined the full, still-classified version of the 2004 CIA Inspector General’s report, as well as other relevant information available to the Department. As a result of my analysis of all of this material, I have concluded that the information known to me warrants opening a preliminary review into whether federal laws were violated in connection with the interrogation of specific detainees at overseas locations. The Department regularly uses preliminary reviews to gather information to determine whether there is sufficient predication to warrant a full investigation of a matter. I want to emphasize that neither the opening of a preliminary review nor, if evidence warrants it, the commencement of a full investigation, means that charges will necessarily follow.

Assistant United States Attorney John Durham was appointed in 2008 by then-Attorney General Michael Mukasey to investigate the destruction of CIA videotapes of detainee interrogations. During the course of that investigation, Mr. Durham has gained great familiarity with much of the information that is relevant to the matter at hand. Accordingly, I have decided to expand his mandate to encompass this related review. Mr. Durham, who is a career prosecutor with the Department of Justice and who has assembled a strong investigative team of experienced professionals, will recommend to me whether there is sufficient predication for a full investigation into whether the law was violated in connection with the interrogation of certain detainees.

There are those who will use my decision to open a preliminary review as a means of broadly criticizing the work of our nation’s intelligence community. I could not disagree more with that view. The men and women in our intelligence community perform an incredibly important service to our nation, and they often do so under difficult and dangerous circumstances. They deserve our respect and gratitude for the work they do. Further, they need to be protected from legal jeopardy when they act in good faith and within the scope of legal guidance. That is why I have made it clear in the past that the Department of Justice will not prosecute anyone who acted in good faith and within the scope of the legal guidance given by the Office of Legal Counsel regarding the interrogation of detainees. I want to reiterate that point today, and to underscore the fact that this preliminary review will not focus on those individuals.

I share the President’s conviction that as a nation, we must, to the extent possible, look forward and not backward when it comes to issues such as these. While this Department will follow its obligation to take this preliminary step to examine possible violations of law, we will not allow our important work of keeping the American people safe to be sidetracked.

I fully realize that my decision to commence this preliminary review will be controversial. As Attorney General, my duty is to examine the facts and to follow the law. In this case, given all of the information currently available, it is clear to me that this review is the only responsible course of action for me to take."

Tweet about this on TwitterShare on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

29 Responses to Holder Announces the Investigation

Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel @tse2935 Saw one of those close up too, eating a dead dear. I still vote bald eagle.
3hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Seriously, "SKIDMORE v. ZEPPELIN et al" may be one of most awesome captions ever. Should actually read RANDY CALIFORNIA v. ZEPPELIN et al
4hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Not just roids, but hemorrhoids. https://t.co/XbEjLSb65I
4hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @BlanksSlate Dammit, and I wasn't even through discussing the last police shooting. Internet is fickle.
5hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz How sweep it is: https://t.co/gXG9j7f6uE
5hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Are the Sawx beating the Yanks? Yes? That is a good day.
5hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @DonnaDiva Yeah, I've been conned. Good one!
5hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @DonnaDiva Yeah, shit, 30 yrs of criminal law and I have no clue of what is scam. Probably I need a Clinton to show me a real scam.
5hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @DonnaDiva @peterdaou @kdrum That is beyond hilarious.
5hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Also anybody who thinks Joe Biden is cuddly instead of a bought off asshole, or Jack Danforth+Hatch are reasonable https://t.co/7avXObIZNA
5hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Anybody reading a Clarence Thomas opinion or supporting obstruction of Merrick Garland ought have to watch HBO's "Confirmation".
5hreplyretweetfavorite