Conyers to Holder: Give Us the 215 Info

I guess I’m not the only one who noticed that DOJ is trying to reauthorize Section 215 without leveling with the American people how they’re using it. John Conyers, Jerrold Nadler, and Bobby Scott have written Eric Holder, requesting that he make more information on the way Section 215 is used public.

In order to meaningfully consider whether and how to extend the "business records" section of the Act, however, we ask that the Department work to provide additional public information on the use of that provision.

Specifically, at the September 22 hearing, Deputy Assistant Attorney General Hinnen testified that orders under Section 215 of the Act, which authorizes compulsory production of "business records," have been used to obtain "transactional information" to support "important and highly sensitive intelligence collection." He explained that some members of the Subcommittee and cleared staff have received some briefings on this topic, and that additional information could be made available to them "in a classified setting."

We have appreciated the information that has been provided, and fully understand the importance of safeguarding our country’s national security secrets. Too often in 2007 and 2008, however, crucial information remained unknown to the public and many members of Congress when Congress voted on important surveillance legislation affecting the interests of all Americans. As has also been requested in the Senate, we ask that the Department work to make publicly available additional basic information on the use of Section 215, so that Congress can more openly and thoroughly consider the future of this authority while fully protecting our national security secrets.

I’m hoping they have more leverage than Russ Feingold, who I believe made this request in the Senate, since nothing is going to pass through HJC without these three gentlemen’s involvement.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

21 Responses to Conyers to Holder: Give Us the 215 Info

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz @BlanksSlate "Lost"
emptywheel @jrmithdobbs #CFP2015 It is being streamed, assume recorded. @culturejedi
emptywheel .@culturejedi "We need a new Civil Rights Act for the era of Big Data." #CFP2015
emptywheel .@culturejedi, on predictive policing: if you can tell the future why not try to prevent poverty?
emptywheel .@culturejedi: "The time for the distinction between those systems that watch you and watch me has long passed." (First applause so far)
emptywheel .@culturejedi: It's not about privacy. It's about sovereignty and power.
emptywheel .@culturejedi tells a room of almost entirely white people that technology will only be democratizing when the tech is democratized.
bmaz Judge making quick work on cop motions.
bmaz @sethdmichaels @bittman @UCSUSA Excellent news.
bmaz @emptywheel Is the investigation still ongoing? Of course it is.....
bmaz RT @acarvin: Judge irritated by endless objections; seems positioned in a never-ending face palm, talking through his fingers. #FreddieGray
bmaz @SpaceCoastLaw @DLind Not totally true, CCA et. al also contribute to Dems. It is mostly because it is easy pickings for saying "something"
October 2009
« Sep   Nov »