Wilkerson: Cheney and Rummy Knew Gitmo Detainees Were Innocent

About a hundred of you have pointed to this story, which reports that Lawrence Wilkerson signed a declaration to support the lawsuit of a former Gitmo detainee, Adel Hassan Hamad, stating that Dick Cheney and Donald Rumsfeld knew there were innocent people at Gitmo.

Colonel Wilkerson, who was General Powell’s chief of staff when he ran the State Department, was most critical of Mr Cheney and Mr Rumsfeld. He claimed that the former Vice-President and Defence Secretary knew that the majority of the initial 742 detainees sent to Guantánamo in 2002 were innocent but believed that it was “politically impossible to release them”.

[snip]

He also claimed that one reason Mr Cheney and Mr Rumsfeld did not want the innocent detainees released was because “the detention efforts would be revealed as the incredibly confused operation that they were”. This was “not acceptable to the Administration and would have been severely detrimental to the leadership at DoD [Mr Rumsfeld at the Defence Department]”.

Referring to Mr Cheney, Colonel Wilkerson, who served 31 years in the US Army, asserted: “He had absolutely no concern that the vast majority of Guantánamo detainees were innocent … If hundreds of innocent individuals had to suffer in order to detain a handful of hardcore terrorists, so be it.”

He alleged that for Mr Cheney and Mr Rumsfeld “innocent people languishing in Guantánamo for years was justified by the broader War on Terror and the small number of terrorists who were responsible for the September 11 attacks”.

Now, as Mary has pointed out, there was actually a study done in summer 2002 that showed that vast majority of those at Gitmo were innocent. So this is not news.

But I certainly welcome some public discussion about the maltreatment of a number of innocent people at Gitmo as we enter back into discussions on closing Gitmo.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

77 Responses to Wilkerson: Cheney and Rummy Knew Gitmo Detainees Were Innocent

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
  • 28
  • 29
  • 30
  • 31
  • 32
  • 33
  • 34
  • 35
  • 36
  • 37
  • 38
  • 39
  • 40
  • 41
  • 42
  • 43
  • 44
  • 45
  • 46
  • 47
  • 48
  • 49
  • 50
  • 51
  • 52
  • 53
  • 54
  • 55
  • 56
  • 57
  • 58
  • 59
  • 60
  • 61
  • 62
  • 63
  • 64
  • 65
  • 66
  • 67
  • 68
  • 69
  • 70
  • 71
  • 72
  • 73
  • 74
  • 75
  • 76
  • 77
Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel @onekade Oh, the "big boy" comment is not about his stature. You're in Boston. Deflate some balls. Everyone's doing it.
5mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @donachaidh Probably not. But still....
7mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @onekade "Hey big boy, you look like you need a 5'5" (or 5'2") "girl"'s help to lift that mighty big bar." Worked like charm in SoCal Golds
7mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @JoshMBlackman Do you think "wreaking havoc" should be a valid consideration in this challenge?
8mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @JasonLeopold There you go again. Pestering torturers. Keep working on him and he'll do 3 videotaped interviews.
12mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @emptywheel: Introducing Mrs. Merlin: To Prosecute Jeffrey Sterling, CIA Exposed an Asset https://t.co/MxSC0drAW3 CIA also revealed $$…
15mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @JackofKent: 2010 BA3 pays £285m over arms corruption claims http://t.co/naLUSqRArm 2015 BAe speaking on "business and rule of law" at …
15mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @michaelbkiefer: And take a look at my website. http://t.co/20On4f9y1n
16mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @phoenixnewtimes Crap, first Monti's and now Big Apple? Though Monti's was a far bigger tragedy.
17mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @onekade I used to find (when I worked out in meat gyms) that offering to spot them guy w/shitty form was far more effective.
18mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @steve_vladeck @JameelJaffer Hey, wait a second, this is in my state and I cannot attend? WTF?
20mreplyretweetfavorite
April 2010
S M T W T F S
« Mar   May »
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930