Bhopal Justice, Sort Of

Twenty-some years after one of the biggest industrial disasters in history, seven former Union Carbide executives have been sentenced to a few years in jail.

A court in central India ruled Monday that seven top executives and the company they worked for are guilty for their role in the 1984 industrial disaster that killed thousands in Bhopal, India.The leaking of poisonous gas from Union Carbide India Limited — the now-defunct local subsidiary of the American chemical company — was one of the world’s worst industrial disasters. Plaintiffs had waited more than two decades for the verdict.

The convicted former employees have been sentenced to the maximum punishment allowed in the case. The judge imposed a two-year prison term and a fine of about $2,000 each after convicting the men of negligence causing death, endangering public life and causing hurt.

While I’m happy that a handful of people will finally pay, however inadequate a price, I’m more interested in this because of the timing.

After Bhopal and a smaller–but still devastating–Union Carbide accident in West Virginia, the US passed regulations on similar volatile processes. During the 1990s, paper mills and chemical plants and oil refineries implemented new processes to make their plants safer for workers. But it didn’t take long for OHSA to back off of big fines. So by the time BP’s Texas City refinery disaster, some oil companies were already calculating that accidents would be less onerous than complying with the regulations passed in response to the Bhopal disaster.

The regulations passed in response to Bhopal specifically exempted drilling activities; those weren’t the regulations BP took lightly in the lead-up to the disaster.

But the treatment of BP’s violation of them at Texas City did contribute to the disaster. As bmaz has written, BP was already a corporate convict because of its past indifference to safety and regulations. Yet that didn’t prevent BP from having the opportunity to gamble with the entire ecosystem of the Gulf so it could profit.

I’m glad Union Carbide execs will finally see some prison time. But it’s not enough to hold executives accountable 26 years after huge disasters. We need to get more serious about holding corporations–and corporate executives–accountable for their crimes.

image_print
42 replies
    • onitgoes says:

      Beat me to it. Well, we’ve all been saying something similar here at FDL. Hayward will ensure that any investigations, trials, what have you, take as looooong as possible to be carried out.

      Thanks for the post, EW. I was in India shortly after the Bhopal disaster occurred (amazing to realize that it’s been that long ago) and am saddened but unsurprised at this verdict. Union Carbide – back then in India – was doing more or less what BP is doing right now in the States. And so, as they say: how LOW the mighty have fallen (no offense to any citizens of Mother India)… and so: on it goes…

      P.S. I fell in love with India when I went there (I think visitors from “wesernized” cultures either love it or hate it), but it was especially very poor back then, and very much of a third world nation. And I thought to myself (honest): get used to it; this is where the USA is headed. The very rich at the top; precious little middle class; and the rest in abject poverty just struggling to survive.

      • Sara says:

        “Thanks for the post, EW. I was in India shortly after the Bhopal disaster occurred (amazing to realize that it’s been that long ago) and am saddened but unsurprised at this verdict. Union Carbide – back then in India – was doing more or less what BP is doing right now in the States. And so, as they say: how LOW the mighty have fallen (no offense to any citizens of Mother India)… and so: on it goes…”

        I too was in India shortly after Bhopal, and followed the story for a number of years. While in India, I met a woman OBGYN who had been sent into Bhopal just after the event, simply to do abortions. Apparently the Government of India decided to offer them to all pregnant women, and my informant had done more than a thousand, she said, in the few weeks after the events. Apparently there are multiple birth defects, but such a policy sure saves the Government of India’s need to pay out damage claims.

        There actually was another suit in US courts, that was settled out of court within a few years of the Bhopal Gassing. The Government of India hired the Kaplan Law Firm in Minneapolis to represent it as plaintiff’s attorney against Union Carbide, essentially to recover expenses of the Government of India for responding to the events, and in addition, the Kaplan firm also represented plaintiff’s from the state government in India, the city of Bhopal, and some thousands of individual litigants. The settlement was close to the limit of the insurance carried, and the funds were given in trust to the Indian Government (national and state) for distribution — leading to massive corruption in who was eventually hired to pass out the funds. By the time the politicians paid off themselves and their buddies, there was little left for the guys that got gassed. A good DFL friend of mine, who sadly died of Cancer a few years back, worked on the case in the Kaplan firm for years — she had a marvelous trail of Bhopal stories illustrating how “wrong” things can go if that is the direction they are headed.

        Fairly early on it was confirmed that the reason the plant went out of control was because the spare tank of coolant (a Gas that begins with F and once was used in air conditioners, but was removed from the market because it was causing the hole in the upper atmosphere at the south pole) was empty. It seems some of the workers and supervisors had allowed blatters of it to be stolen for sale to Indians who needed to fix their airconditioners, machines that could not use the replacement gas for F. The guages had been “fixed” so as to not reflect the theft. Apparently everyone with access to the spare tanks of F was in on getting a cut on the sale of F — and no one of course reported it. Thus when it was needed, it wasn’t there — oh yea, now I remember, F is Freon.

        Union Carbide of India was owned 49% by the Indian Government, and 51% by Union Carbide. It was the first international contract India had entered into since independence that did not require the majority share to be owned by the Government of India, and the contract dates back to the Nixon Administration. The State Department had “sponsored” the contract, if I remember rightly, gave some foreign aid to support it, because it was a key element in green revolution technology (then rice and wheat) as the pesticide vastly decreased the amount of the harvest of the new strains of wheat and rice that were not lost to pests. (Before Green Revolution pest loss was between 20 and 30% of the harvest). The whole point of India’s engagement with Green Revolution efforts was to make India self sufficient in small grains as opposed to an importer — thus technology that increased the total marketable production was all part of the Green Revolution package. But by 1984, when the leak occurred, Indian Agriculture was experimenting with other pest control products, and thus the demand for Union Carbide’s product was decreasing year by year. As a result the plant was not operating at full capacity, and Government of India had cut budget for plant maintence which was it’s responsibility under the contract. In fact when the leak occurred, Government of India and Union Carbide were in negotiations to expand the plant’s product line to other purposes — Negotiations that stopped with the leak.

        Being in India just after the events meant that in those pre-internet days I had access to Indian Investigative Journalism (which is very live wire) in ways one would not have if you were not there and able to collect magazines and newspapers off the racks at train stations (I have a huge pile of them…in fact the Kaplan Lawyers through my friend, copied a mass of them for their files.) In India, in 1984, the whole Environmental Activist thing was quite new — Bhopal gave it a good kick in the ass — but reporters were just beginning to dig into some of the potential major stories. For instance, when I was there another big issue was nuclear waste — at the time, liquid nuclear waste was just dumped on waste ground around factories, meaning it quickly got into the water table. It is this mix of potentially dangerous yet “modern” high technology with an everyday public culture not at all designed to deal with it, that hits you in the face day after day in India. For instance, the computer biz was new then too — and as one knows, print-out’s of data consume much paper, but in India you haul the waste paper away from the International Style office park in an ox-cart. You are just constantly confronted with such ancient and modern contradictions.

        • Petrocelli says:

          Great story, as always Sara. India bombards you with opposing viewpoints constantly … it is an experience unlike any other.

          And yes, most of the payout got taken by Bureaucrats, which is why having these guys spend some time in Jail is a small but significant slice of justice.

  1. phred says:

    Union Carbide India Limited — the now-defunct local subsidiary of the American chemical company

    This bit also struck me as an appropriate reminder of what will likely happen with BP. A unit will get carved off to shoulder the burden of litigation so that it can become a “defunct” company that paid the price for its transgressions, while the lion’s share of the corporation goes humming right along…

    I think you posted something along these lines the other day EW. That excerpt suggests that you are about to be right again ; )

    • manys says:

      This bit also struck me as an appropriate reminder of what will likely happen with BP. A unit will get carved off to shoulder the burden of litigation so that it can become a “defunct” company that paid the price for its transgressions, while the lion’s share of the corporation goes humming right along…

      This is exactly the true meaning of the convictions. Sure, it’s some justice in the context of a long-term court fight, but that Union Carbide was able to so effectively amputate its own responsibility is a shame. If I had time, I’d write up a parallel timeline on UC’s response to Bhopal to map BP’s response to its spill.

      Too big to jail, indeed.

  2. Petrocelli says:

    The Indian Judicial System is so corrupt and morally bankrupt that even this small victory is a very, big deal.

    • onitgoes says:

      You’re not wrong about that. Having spent time in India, I can confirm that this is true. Amazed that any consequences happened bc I’m sure that everyone and their auntie got very big baksheesh, indeed. hmmm…

  3. BoxTurtle says:

    Last year, the trial court also issued a warrant of arrest for Warren Anderson, the former chairman of the U.S.-based Union Carbide Corp. He has been declared an “absconder” — or a fugitive — from the indictment

    Union Carbide says neither the parent company nor its officials are subject to the jurisdiction of Indian courts.

    I’ll go with “sort of”.

    Boxturtle (Why flee prosecution when you can delay it until after death?)

    • DWBartoo says:

      Amazing, not only are corporations “people”, but they are VERY special “people”, for they are completely above the law. Any law.

      How very nice for them.

      How very awful for everyone else.

      And it all comes down to Money?

      What else could “it” be?

      Corporations are not yet recognized as Gawd’s chosen “people”?

      Someone needs to get on that. Posthaste.

      (Posthumous “recognition” will not be forwarded to the heavenly mansions? No word to Saint Pete? Who could have imagined? Could this be Rapture?)

      DW

      • onitgoes says:

        Heh… I’ve always maintained that Ken Lay ain’t dead yet. By his timely, convenient “death,” all sorts of redress was avoided… why how nice. I think Ken Lay is hiding out in Cheney’s undisclosed location and/or somewhere like Uruguay. Why not? If the Bush’s could arrange for the Bin Laden family to fly out of the USA on 9/11, why not give Ken Lay (who paid off the Bush family VERY handsomely, thanks very much) the keys to their property in Uruguay?? I’m sure there’s plenty of room.

  4. Peterr says:

    From the Times of India:

    Former Supreme Court Chief Justice A H Ahmadi on Tuesday rejected criticism of dilution of charge against Union Carbide executives in Bhopal gas tragedy case, saying in criminal law there was no concept of vicarious liability. . . .

    Justice Ahmadi, who headed the bench in 1996 that converted the CBI charge under the stringent provisions of 304-II that provided for maximum of 10 years imprisonment to Section with two years maximum imprisonment, said it was easy for people to talk and make allegations but judges have to work under the system. . . .

    “There is no concept of vicarious liability. If my driver is driving and meets with a fatal accident, I don’t become liable to be prosecuted under 304-II,” he said.

    I wonder: this was the initial verdict in this case. What is the likelihood of appeal, and how long will that take?

    • BoxTurtle says:

      Linky

      My response to Obama: You don’t have the power to fire him, so that’s a really safe thing to say. Requires no action on your part. You do have the power to bring criminal charges. And you do have the power to take his passport, so he can’t flee. Let’s talk about that.

      Boxturtle (*crickets*)

      • b2020 says:

        http://www.eschatonblog.com/2010/06/tell-bps-hayward-to-make-my-day.html
        plus
        http://www.upi.com/Top_News/US/2010/06/08/Obama-says-he-would-fire-BP-CEO-Hayward/UPI-32051276006716/

        It’s Obama doing his Bush impersonation doing his Bruce Willis impersonation doing his Client Eastwood impersonation. It’s 11-dimensional bluster!

        Anyhow – Obama doing his inner Bush, he sure is getting better and better at it. Maybe he can pull off an illegal war – with Iran, maybe, or balls-out with Pakistan – before the 2012 elections. That would be about perfect, and I am sure The People will rally to their usual Commanding-Chief appreciation.

        History repeating the farce of repeating history – what do you even call that?

      • DWBartoo says:

        But, gosh BoxTurtle, Obama chirps so intelligently and so dependably in all eleven dimensions, astutely … as well.

        And Tony is very ass toot as well.

        What can I tell ya, we are in the presence of buy-national geniusness.

        Isn’t it thralling, er, thrilling?

        Obama and Hayward are very disturbed … er … upset… they may be whelmed but they are not overwhelmed … just a little edgy and very annoyed with the “damn” hole is sticked thing.

        And this “plume affair” … on top (well, under) of everything else …

        But, on the bright side, Obama is deciderating whose “ass to kick”.

        DW

      • TruthandJustice says:

        Agreed. How about President Obama instructing the Justice department to make BP post a bond of say $100 Billion to ensure the cost of this epic disaster truly gets paid; before BP “escapes” their obligation via bankruptcy.

    • bmaz says:

      And yet Obama keeps Rahm Emanuel around despite his similarity to Hayward in track record and negative effect on people.

      • jerryy says:

        And yet Obama keeps Rahm Emanuel around despite his similarity to Hayward in track record and negative effect on people.

        He also has neglected to return those large campaign contributions from BP. I wonder if he will look in the mirror next time he is looking to find out whose ‘ass to kick’.

    • fatster says:

      Does that mean Obama is looking backward now? I thought he was still stumbling around trying to figure out whose ass to kick.

  5. Leen says:

    But when we are talking about inappropriate comments. Let’s not forget one of Obama’s. The drone comment way out of line

    • DWBartoo says:

      Presidential prerogative, Leen, surely you understand … it’s a marker of cool … a sign of … Leen, it’s a “guy” thing, what can I tell ya?

      Woe betide the first female Preznit who has the audacity …

      Um … er … Leen, ah … look, just forget it … ‘cuz Barry was only joking … prolly.

      Okay. Forget this comment.

      (Obscenely, disgustingly “way out of line” is closer to the truth.)

      DW

  6. BoxTurtle says:

    It’s 11-dimensional bluster

    There’s the phrase of the day!

    Boxturtle (If I’d have thought of it, it would have been right here)

  7. barne says:

    Meanwhile, steal a 3rd splice of pizza in a three-strikes state, and it’s life in prison for you.

    • BoxTurtle says:

      Pizza thieves SHOULD be locked up. Starting with my miserable stepson.

      Boxturtle (Unless the pizza has anchovies. Then we treat them and hope they can return to society)

      • DWBartoo says:

        You is topping yourself, Turtle.

        An’ you is definitely crusty.

        (Could we have more, please.)

        ;~DW

    • thatvisionthing says:

      Repeating again an issue I raised before of the crazy scales of environmental justice, on the one end those who act in defense of the environment, vs the other end, those who don’t give a shit about the environment. IANAL, but this is my understanding:

      Environmental and animal rights activists who do property damage may be classified as “domestic terrorists” with “inspirational significance.” This gets them a ticket to a special prison, a CMU—communication management unit–the purpose of which is to keep them almost totally isolated and with no due process to challenge their placement.

      Government Acknowledges Secretive Prisons for “Domestic Terrorists,” Proposes Making Them Permanent
      Apr 14th, 2010 by Will Potter

      The Bureau’s proposal makes clear that the CMUs are intended to keep these cases isolated, and to keep political prisoners with “inspirational significance” from communicating with the communities and social movements of which they are part.

      Per the podcast interview with Will Potter (at 5:55), apparently it’s not even known who assigns them to these units — it’s not a judge, maybe a warden, maybe higher up?

      These units used to be secret, but now they’re out in the open and multiplying and the government is trying to get even more stringent isolations put into law: A prisoner is to be allowed three pieces of paper a week to one recipient, one <15 minute phone call a month, one hour visit a month (down from the current four hours), and NO TOUCHING. (Inspiration is contagious?) The environmental activist/domestic terrorist in the story linked to above, Daniel McGowan, has not hugged his wife in two years.

      So that’s the other end of the legal accountability/consequences scale that what BP faces needs to be weighed against. And a president and Congress that let this happen.

      Scale is a good word—if you try to picture the damage that the environmental activists did, I imagine you can stand next to it and take a picture with your camera.

      On the other hand, if you try to picture the damage BP is doing, you have to pull back to a satellite photo, and bore deep with a microscope, and look forward days and months and years in time, and you cannot encompass it, cannot comprehend it.

      But it's not just scale, it's motive.

      Environmental activists act out of moral concerns–empathy, respect, anguish at harm, caring, concern for the future, whatever.

      From an article on Daniel McGowan:

      “We torched Jefferson Poplar because hybrid poplars are an ecological nightmare threatening native biodiversity in the ecosystem,” the saboteurs wrote in a communique that was released after the action. “Our forests are being liquidated and replaced with mono-cultured tree farms so greedy, earth-raping corporations can make more money.”

      BP, Exxon, Union Carbide–not even. Private profit, and everything else be damned.

      Maybe this is Michael Moore’s we vs. me divide.

      Imagine if eco persons, or greater good persons, were writing the laws instead of corporate persons.

      In fact, the way laws are going now, what with corporations not having to admit guilt for property damage and maimings and disablings and deaths, and instead being put on (wink wink) corporate monitoring where they pay sweet fines and then sweet fees to corporate monitors (which is where old AGs go when they move on to sweeter places; e.g., Ashcroft, Mukasey), it’s just such a sweet loop, I bet BP can’t wait to get charged with a crime and the government can’t wait to charge them. BP: Bed partners.

      A question I raised in the earlier diary is, who is BP’s corporate monitor for their Alaska and Texas open cases? Is this a knowable unknown?

        • thatvisionthing says:

          I’m replying half-cocked here before the comments close…thanks for your answer… You know ianal (that always sounds like I am anal, same thing? :-) so your knowledge is so much appreciated.

          A few questions:

          – What’s the difference between a probation officer and a corporate monitor? Can DOJ outsource probation officing to a private party? In which case, same thing? I’m making that up, but it seems a fair suspicion, and I wonder if the probation officer is known? Per Lichtblau’s article:

          In many cases, the name of the monitor and the details of the agreement are kept secret.

          – How is it decided to charge a case civilly OR criminally? 1) How did BP even get charged criminally here–twice? An oil company charged by the Bush DOJ, what could be more perfect for a corporate monitor? 2) I would think there should still be a civil hook open to hang BP on, or said another way, a lucky sweetheart payola chip still to be played.

          – I read through your original post again this morning and got as far as Mary’s comment:

          [bmaz – wasn’t it a deferred prosecution boondoggle deal that gave Gonzales some of his only work since leaving office?]

          Is Gonzalez a corporate monitor (deferred prosecution) too? I thought he had been left out of the club. What deal?

          Also the big picture you paint in that story is that BP has captured regulators (but not Congress?) and DOJ is protecting that scam even when it breaks the law to do so (per EPA investigator Scott West’s letter that DOJ obstructed his investigation and imposed illegally low fines). Come on, where’s the check and balance? It’s crazy, where is it? Can an outside group like the ACLU or NRDC sue? (Who has standing?) I expect nothing from Obama and Holder, which is a separate shame in itself. Both you and Jason Leopold noted that since BP failed probation in Texas and Alaska, they should still be open for renewed or new criminal charges…and then you both laughed at the thought that that would ever happen. Well, damn it, there must be a way–?

          Thanks.

          (I’m with OrionATL):

          bmaz

          you can’t stop here.

          you’ve just given us chapter 1 of this mystery.

          this has the feel off a major story.

          you can’t leave us not knowing the political origins of the doj sweetheart settlements.

          who ordered them?

          who got paid?

          in what currency and how much?

          this could be a major story, one that might force holder to get off his ass and act like an attorney general.

          i’m gonna be waitin’ for chapter 2!

  8. ShotoJamf says:

    So…do you suppose there’s some extra room in that jail cell for Tony Hayward, etal?

  9. Mary says:

    I swear an earlier version of the NYT story on this also had the nugget that one of those convicted has already passed away – but I can’t find it in there now.

    This story makes a passing reference to it
    http://www.google.com/hostednews/ap/article/ALeqM5gbqBy_6b4bVX6k5A7dZrahw0VqSQD9G6A16O0
    “One of the Indian officials has since died.”
    along with the information that the the other defendants are mostly in their seventies, no sentences have been imposed yet, and this tidbit that ties in with the other related discussions we’ve had here on spinning off subsidiaries and protecting assets:

    “Anderson, and Union Carbide and its subsidiaries, have never appeared in court proceedings.”

    Instead of the parent, “The subsidiary company, Union Carbide India Ltd., was convicted … but the company no longer exists”

    All of which goes to yet another conversation that has come up from time to time. This concept of treating companies as persons has never been challenged on the basis most of them, today, have a state law overlay that was unknown at common law (corporations, llcs, ltd liabl pships, etc. were not common law entities – only pships, soleproprietorships and jvs as companies)

    Once you add limited liability to an entities structure, you have something that was both unknown at common law and is intrinsically different from a person, who can always be called to account, or a common law business, where owners of the business are liable for the business debts.

    fwiw.

    • DWBartoo says:

      Thank you, Mary.

      Your last two paragraphs need to be widely broadcast, that real, human beings may understand the kind of “persons” which we now confront.

      It wouldn’t harm lawyers to be exposed to such truth either, it might even help, who knows?

      DW

    • thatvisionthing says:

      “Corporations do everything people do except breathe, die and go to jail for dumping 1.3 million pounds of PCBs in the Hudson River.”

      – Stephen Colbert – The Word – Let Freedom Ka-Ching – September 15, 2009 – with screen:
      “GE – We Bring Bad Things To Fish”

  10. cregan says:

    I completely agree. These people should have been held accountable many years ago. Many years ago.

  11. Mary says:

    OT – we get a bit better look at what the Obama admin means by “transparency”

    Steve Aftergood has a piece up on a UN report on “best practices” for intelligence (to keep torture killings and disappeared children and the like at a more manageable level than Bush and Obama seem to want)

    http://www.fas.org/blog/secrecy/2010/06/intel_good_practices.html

    Lots of good stuff in this piece, but what I found most interesting was at the end.

    … the UN compilation’s Practice 3 directs that “The powers and competences of intelligence services [should be] clearly and exhaustively defined in national law.”

    But the terms of current U.S. intelligence law are not entirely clear or exhaustive. We don’t know, for example, the current nature or scope of domestic surveillance activities or what exactly was permitted under the most recently enacted amendments to the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act.

    That absence of public clarity is deliberate, said NSA Director Gen. Keith B. Alexander, the new Commander of US Cyber Command …

    In response to a question from Kate Martin of the Center for National Security Studies about the feasibility of increasing public disclosure of cyber security policy, Gen. Alexander said that that was not his preferred approach. Instead, he promised, government officials would be fully candid with each other, while continuing to withhold information from the public. In other words, he said, what Americans can expect is “transparency at the classified level.”

    emph added

    Apparently, we can rely on Obama’s constant and committed search for whose ass to kick as our legal and political compass.

    • thatvisionthing says:

      Collateral murder, embassy scandals? Who cares. But spill something CYBER… From the Wired report of the wikileaks arrest:

      The agents did tell Lamo that he may be asked to testify against Manning. The Bureau was particularly interested in information that Manning gave Lamo about an apparently-sensitive military cybersecurity matter, Lamo said.

      That seemed to be the least interesting information to Manning, however. What seemed to excite him most in his chats was his supposed leaking of the embassy cables. He anticipated returning to the states after his early discharge, and watching from the sidelines as his action bared the secret history of U.S. diplomacy around the world.

      “Everywhere there’s a U.S. post, there’s a diplomatic scandal that will be revealed,” Manning wrote. “It’s open diplomacy. World-wide anarchy in CSV format. It’s Climategate with a global scope, and breathtaking depth. It’s beautiful, and horrifying.”

  12. rainshadow says:

    Does anybody really think that if anyone goes to jail that they will be of an American/European persuassion?

  13. thatvisionthing says:

    P.S. Who are the US Attorneys for Alaska and Texas cases? (Looking at the Alaska PDF, last item #6 on p. 3: “Within 90 days of the date of the defendant organization’s guilty plea, the defendant organization must acquire the approval of the U.S. Attorney’s office in the definition and terms of the three benchmark indicators pursuant to this agreement.” (Gees, US Attorneys… of course it’s dirty.)

    Also, is this usual for a court document? p. 1 the signature of the judicial officer is redacted — wtf?

Comments are closed.