Lindsey Graham’s Independent Review for All Detainees in US Prisons

As I’ve said before, I think Carl Levin’s assurances that habeas corpus will prevent the Executive from holding people without cause under his new detainee provisions (and, frankly, under the status quo) is dangerously naive, because it ignores how badly the DC Circuit has gutted habeas.

That said, maybe this colloquy between Lindsey Graham and Carl Levin might help. (h/t to Lawfare for making transcripts available)

Mr. GRAHAM. If someone is picked up as a suspected enemy combatant under this narrow window, not only does the executive branch get to determine how best to do that–do you agree with me that, in this war, that every person picked up as an enemy combatant–citizen or not–here in the United States goes before a Federal judge, and our government has to prove to an independent judiciary outside the executive branch by a preponderance of the evidence that you are who we say you are and that you have fit in this narrow window? That if you are worried about some abuse of this, we have got a check and balance where the judiciary, under the law that we have created, has an independent review obligation to determine whether the executive branch has abused their power, and that decision can be appealed all the way to the Supreme Court?
Mr. LEVIN. That guarantee is called habeas corpus. It has been in our law. It is untouched by anything in this bill. Quite the opposite; we actually enhance the procedures here.

[snip]

Mr. GRAHAM. In this case where somebody is worried about being picked up by a rogue executive branch because they went to the wrong political rally, they don’t have to worry very long, because our Federal courts have the right and the obligation to make sure the government proves their case that you are a member of al-Qaida and didn’t go to a political rally. That has never happened in any other war. That is a check and balance here in this war. And let me tell you why it is necessary.
This is a war without end. There will never be a surrender ceremony signing on the USS Missouri. So what we have done, knowing that an enemy combatant determination could be a de facto life sentence, is we are requiring the courts to look over the military’s shoulder to create checks and balances. Quite frankly, I think that is a good accommodation.

[snip]

I want to be able to tell anybody who is interested that no person in an American prison–civilian or military–held as a suspected member of al-Qaida will be held without independent judicial review. We are not allowing the executive branch to make that decision unchecked. For the first time in the history of American warfare, every American combatant held by the executive branch will have their day in Federal court, and the government has to prove by a preponderance of the evidence you are in fact part of the enemy force. [my emphasis]

Not only does Graham insist the standard in habeas cases must be a “preponderance of the evidence” standard–something the DC Circuit has threatened to chip away at. But the language about courts having an obligation to make sure the government proves it case and courts looking over the shoulder sure implies a stronger review than Janice Rogers Brown understands it.

Furthermore, while Graham speaks explicitly at times about people caught in the US, his aspiration that “no person in an American prison … will be held without independent judicial review” would sure sound good the detainees in the American prison at Bagram, particularly taken in conjunction with Section 1036, which seems to suggest they get a review too.

Of course, passing a law stating that habeas corpus must consist of something more than a Circuit Court Judge rubber-stamping the government’s inaccurate intelligence files would be far better. But this language, showing legislative intent that habeas review remain real, is about all we get these days.

 

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

22 Responses to Lindsey Graham’s Independent Review for All Detainees in US Prisons

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel @Martina Doesn't look like they like women sports tweeters much. Not even Serena, prolly cause she really would kick their ass.
3mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @BuffyBlogs Clearly.
16mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Can no one keep Pandas off the base paths??
19mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Just to be clear, with cable TV "Creepy Rob Lowe" would have seen MLB playoffs, while yuppy ass normal Rob Lowe would have been in the dark.
20mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @ErrataRob Including public documents put out officially by NSA/ODNI? @LitThom @ioerror @daveaitel @headhntr @granick
23mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @ErrataRob & we should believe what 40,000 NSA employees told you illegally v public docs? @LitThom @ioerror @daveaitel @headhntr @granick
23mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @ErrataRob With all 40,000 NSA employees? Impressive. @LitThom @ioerror @daveaitel @headhntr @granick
24mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @JamilSmith: Judge rules @nflcommish Roger Goodell must testify at Ray Rice's suspension appeal hearing. Not good for Goodell. http://t.…
28mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @ErrataRob So your assertion abt what "all" NSA employees believe is based on ... ? @LitThom @ioerror @daveaitel @headhntr @granick
29mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @tribalidentity Good point.
30mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @ErrataRob You made an assertion abt "all NSA employees." I asked we had heard from one. @LitThom @ioerror @daveaitel @headhntr @granick
32mreplyretweetfavorite
December 2011
S M T W T F S
« Nov   Jan »
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031