Defense Authorization Conference Makes Few Changes to Detainee Provisions

According to a press release from Senator Levin’s office, the conference on the Defense Authorization has made few changes to the detainee provisions institutionalizing military detention of alleged terrorists.

With regards to Section 1031, which authorized the indefinite detention of alleged terrorists, the conference bill,

Reaffirm[s] the military’s existing authority to detain individuals captured in the course of hostilities conducted pursuant to the Authorization for the Use of Military Force. No change has been made to the Senate version of this provision, which confirms that nothing in the provision may be “construed to affect existing law or authorities relating to the detention of United States citizens, lawful resident aliens of the United States, or any other persons who are captured or arrested in the United States.”

Section 1032, which mandates presumptive military detention, adds language purporting not to change FBI’s national security authorities (though I don’t understand how that could practically be the case).

Require military detention – subject to a Presidential waiver – for foreign al Qaeda terrorists who attack the United States. This provision specifically exempts United States citizens and lawful resident aliens, authorizes transfer of detainees to civilian custody for trial in civilian court, and leaves it up to the President to establish procedures for determining how and when persons determined to be subject to military custody would be transferred, and to ensure that such determinations do not interfere with ongoing intelligence, surveillance, or interrogation operations. Language added in conference confirms that nothing in the provision may be “construed to affect the existing criminal enforcement and national security authorities of the Federal Bureau of Investigation or any other domestic law enforcement agency with regard to a covered person, regardless whether such covered person is held in military custody.” [my emphasis]

And the conference does change the breathtaking limits on Attorney General authority in the Senate bill I laid out here, apparently adopting the House formulation of requiring the AG to ask permission of the Defense Secretary before the AG does his or her job.

Require the Attorney General to consult with the Secretary of Defense before prosecuting a foreign al Qaeda terrorist who is determined to be covered under the previous section, or any other person who is held in military custody outside the United States, on whether the more appropriate forum for trial is a federal court or a military commission and whether the individual should be held in civilian or military custody pending trial.

It seems to me the language does enough to avoid a veto from the cowardly Obama, but still does terrible damage to both the clarity of national security roles and overall investigative expertise.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+1Email to someone

23 Responses to Defense Authorization Conference Makes Few Changes to Detainee Provisions

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel @normative To clarify, proper usage is GIgabytes of Metadata & Miscellaneous Information Electronic (GIMMIE)?@csoghoian @KenDilanianAP
emptywheel @ErrataRob What qualifies as "bulk," you mean? Gotta get a warrant for 500G hard drive... @normative @csoghoian @KenDilanianAP
emptywheel @normative Ooh! Nice! You're almost as clever as Sensenbrenner. @csoghoian @KenDilanianAP
emptywheel @toxic Thank you so much! (I'm tired...)
emptywheel The Section 215 Rap Sheet (Reupping bc I accidentally published before its time)
emptywheel RT @cgberube: @RadioFreeTom the same people who believe NSA is capable of tapping their comms r same who believe govt can't even fix pothol…
emptywheel @csoghoian In fact I propose we call 215 the "Gigabytes of Metadata & Other Electronic Information" Provision, per IG Report @KenDilanianAP
emptywheel @csoghoian In fact, rather than using the IC's nonsensical definition for bulk, as USAF does, let's limit it by Gigs. @KenDilanianAP
emptywheel @csoghoian Me, I just want a sense of how much a Gig is in privacy terms bc that's the unit 215 orders operate on. @KenDilanianAP
emptywheel @Krhawkins5 Also, first you'd have to let the govt have encrypted convos with that intermediary.
emptywheel @Krhawkins5 I have another proposal: The press keeping reporting secrets until the secret people stop acting like crazy people.
emptywheel The sound the door of FISC makes when Richard Burr and Mitch McConnell have missed reauthorization deadline.
December 2011
« Nov   Jan »