PG&E’s Profitable Threat to Our Critical Infrastructure

Back when PA’s Department of Homeland Security was investigating anti-fracking activists as potential terrorist threats to critical infrastructure, I noted that the bigger threat to critical infrastructure pipelines was corporations that pocket rate increases rather than dedicating them to maintaining the pipelines.

Just to take one example, who do you think is a greater risk to our oil and gas infrastructure? A bunch of hippie protesters trying to limit drilling in the Marcellus Shale and thereby protect the quality of their drinking water (which is, itself, considered critical infrastructure)? Or PG&E, which sat on knowledge of an extremely high risk pipeline for three years even after setting aside the money to fix it?

Now CA’s Public Utilities Commission is out with audit results that show just how negligent PG&E was.

Pacific Gas and Electric Co. diverted more than $100 million in gas safety and operations money collected from customers over a 15-year period and spent it for other purposes, including profit for stockholders and bonuses for executives, according to a pair of state-ordered reports released Thursday.

An independent audit and a staff report issued by the California Public Utilities Commission depicted a poorly led company well-heeled in its gas operations and more concerned with profit than safety.

The documents link a deficient PG&E safety culture – with its “focus on financial performance” – to the pipeline explosion in San Bruno on Sept. 9, 2010, that killed eight people and destroyed 38 homes.

The “low priority” the company gave to pipeline safety during the three years leading up to the San Bruno blast was “well outside industry practice – even during times of corporate austerity programs,” said the audit by Overland Consulting of Leawood, Kan.

Congresswoman Jackie Speier, who represents San Bruno, enunciates what’s going on perfectly.

“It is truly unconscionable that PG&E was allowed by the CPUC to steal ratepayer monies that should have been spent on safety and, instead, was put in the pockets of PG&E shareholders,” said Rep. Jackie Speier,

Though, if PG&E were Muslim and brown-skinned, they’d call this terrorism, not just theft.
Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

5 Responses to PG&E’s Profitable Threat to Our Critical Infrastructure

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz @Pachacutec_ The mosquito effect is still rippling!
4mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Obama could've picked an AG nom to put DOJ back on track to propriety+fairness. Instead it's Lynch who wants to turn grandmas into snitches
5mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV @bmaz But, but, she just said waterboarding is torture! ZOMG!!1!
8mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Loretta Lynch will provide all the worst parts of the Holder DOJ out of control prosecutorial zealotry with none of the progressive touches.
8mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV RT @markknoller: "Waterboarding is torture, Senator, and thus illegal," says Atty Gen nominee Loretta Lynch at confirmation hearing this mo…
9mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV @LeslieMolony Maybe. But he certainly attracts them with how sloppy he is when eating. Even right after teeth get floated...
11mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz 12 Reasons Not to Trust Chuck Schumer http://t.co/UHzylFd7Tj Never forget the wise words of @Pachacutec_
11mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @Pachacutec_ Was just gonna comment on that. You Incans are quite well preserved.
12mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Has Goodell and his stooge Ted Wells gotten around to interviewing the NFL "ball checker official" who set the Patriots up?
15mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @Pachacutec_ Heh, nice work then!
16mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @Pachacutec_: @bmaz someone with access once told me he sputtered over a post of mine, who the hell is pacha... What IS that?
17mreplyretweetfavorite
January 2012
S M T W T F S
« Dec   Feb »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031