PG&E’s Profitable Threat to Our Critical Infrastructure

Back when PA’s Department of Homeland Security was investigating anti-fracking activists as potential terrorist threats to critical infrastructure, I noted that the bigger threat to critical infrastructure pipelines was corporations that pocket rate increases rather than dedicating them to maintaining the pipelines.

Just to take one example, who do you think is a greater risk to our oil and gas infrastructure? A bunch of hippie protesters trying to limit drilling in the Marcellus Shale and thereby protect the quality of their drinking water (which is, itself, considered critical infrastructure)? Or PG&E, which sat on knowledge of an extremely high risk pipeline for three years even after setting aside the money to fix it?

Now CA’s Public Utilities Commission is out with audit results that show just how negligent PG&E was.

Pacific Gas and Electric Co. diverted more than $100 million in gas safety and operations money collected from customers over a 15-year period and spent it for other purposes, including profit for stockholders and bonuses for executives, according to a pair of state-ordered reports released Thursday.

An independent audit and a staff report issued by the California Public Utilities Commission depicted a poorly led company well-heeled in its gas operations and more concerned with profit than safety.

The documents link a deficient PG&E safety culture – with its “focus on financial performance” – to the pipeline explosion in San Bruno on Sept. 9, 2010, that killed eight people and destroyed 38 homes.

The “low priority” the company gave to pipeline safety during the three years leading up to the San Bruno blast was “well outside industry practice – even during times of corporate austerity programs,” said the audit by Overland Consulting of Leawood, Kan.

Congresswoman Jackie Speier, who represents San Bruno, enunciates what’s going on perfectly.

“It is truly unconscionable that PG&E was allowed by the CPUC to steal ratepayer monies that should have been spent on safety and, instead, was put in the pockets of PG&E shareholders,” said Rep. Jackie Speier,

Though, if PG&E were Muslim and brown-skinned, they’d call this terrorism, not just theft.
Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

5 Responses to PG&E’s Profitable Threat to Our Critical Infrastructure

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz RT @ggreenwald: If you're (justifiably) enraged about the espionage charges Iran levied against Jason Razaian, Google "Sami al-Hajj" & "Bil…
36mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @DerekGossler @william_pitts That's it?? That looks like shit compared to the original rebuild renderings.
42mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @yeselson @imillhiser Perfect nominee?? Lynch is a terrible nominee+is a regression from Holder on pretty much every material liberal issue
44mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @OKnox Need more pictures of Socks on acid.
52mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @Pedinska As you know, I am not exactly Assange's biggest fan. But he is seriously spot on here.
1hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @APribetic @techdirt I am a one trick pony. You should know this by now!
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @PhilPerspective Yes. Probably the ONLY one. @onekade
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @nickmanes1 When's Miami going to the Tundra? Cold feet worked for Suh last year. @TedLott
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @nickmanes1 Also if you want to have an ice bowl you gotta have it in outdoor stadium. @TedLott
1hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Um, no!-------> "Is Merely Explaining The Streisand Effect To Someone A 'Threat'?" https://t.co/H12WUGri0l via @Techdirt
1hreplyretweetfavorite
January 2012
S M T W T F S
« Dec   Feb »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031