PG&E’s Profitable Threat to Our Critical Infrastructure

Back when PA’s Department of Homeland Security was investigating anti-fracking activists as potential terrorist threats to critical infrastructure, I noted that the bigger threat to critical infrastructure pipelines was corporations that pocket rate increases rather than dedicating them to maintaining the pipelines.

Just to take one example, who do you think is a greater risk to our oil and gas infrastructure? A bunch of hippie protesters trying to limit drilling in the Marcellus Shale and thereby protect the quality of their drinking water (which is, itself, considered critical infrastructure)? Or PG&E, which sat on knowledge of an extremely high risk pipeline for three years even after setting aside the money to fix it?

Now CA’s Public Utilities Commission is out with audit results that show just how negligent PG&E was.

Pacific Gas and Electric Co. diverted more than $100 million in gas safety and operations money collected from customers over a 15-year period and spent it for other purposes, including profit for stockholders and bonuses for executives, according to a pair of state-ordered reports released Thursday.

An independent audit and a staff report issued by the California Public Utilities Commission depicted a poorly led company well-heeled in its gas operations and more concerned with profit than safety.

The documents link a deficient PG&E safety culture – with its “focus on financial performance” – to the pipeline explosion in San Bruno on Sept. 9, 2010, that killed eight people and destroyed 38 homes.

The “low priority” the company gave to pipeline safety during the three years leading up to the San Bruno blast was “well outside industry practice – even during times of corporate austerity programs,” said the audit by Overland Consulting of Leawood, Kan.

Congresswoman Jackie Speier, who represents San Bruno, enunciates what’s going on perfectly.

“It is truly unconscionable that PG&E was allowed by the CPUC to steal ratepayer monies that should have been spent on safety and, instead, was put in the pockets of PG&E shareholders,” said Rep. Jackie Speier,

Though, if PG&E were Muslim and brown-skinned, they’d call this terrorism, not just theft.
Tweet about this on Twitter3Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook1Google+0Email to someone

5 Responses to PG&E’s Profitable Threat to Our Critical Infrastructure

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel @KevinBuist Just barely missed the opportunity to slap a sign on them and chat up some votes. @WOODTV
33mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @conor64 Wouldn't that require getting out of DC? Scary.
59mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @FedcourtJunkie @ScottKGraham Was there any mention of Merry Chan's little Tuesday night stunt?
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @dcbigjohn: Most transparent administration ever won't say if the NSA is doing business with an official's husband http://t.co/b2M5IIaGMi
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Thanks to @MrDelvan, interesting roll call of OEF/OIF veterans' votes on ISIS funding. 9N 7Y https://t.co/1ehcM2AQHv
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @MrDelvan Thanks--interesting. @flanagancan @LeoShane
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @cristianafarias We've gone to a few Scottish weddings. Watch out for the cartwheels at the end.
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @cate_long Right. One reason I raised cartel violence is bc a lot of security $$ gets dumped there. @sasha2000
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @cristianafarias My spouse looks excellent in a kilt. #NotEvenAnUnpopularOpinion.
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @robertcaruso Duckworth was a no as well. @colinwilhelm
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @cate_long Sort of. Doesn't foster a really healthy life style.
3hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @cate_long Huge chunk of that is in Monterrey, in area that a few years ago was badly racked by cartel violence.
3hreplyretweetfavorite
January 2012
S M T W T F S
« Dec   Feb »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031