Peter King Uses Tax Evasion Case as Proof of Hezbollah Involvement in US

Peter King is having another of his fear-mongering hearings on the Islamic threat in the US–this one focused on “Iran, Hezbollah, and the Threat to the Homeland.” As part of that, they’ve released a whopping 2-page report on that threat, including such claims such as this one:

After 9/11, many in law enforcement and intelligence assumed Hezbollah would only strike inside our borders if Israel or the U.S. attacked Iran’s nuclear facilities. Iran’s unprovoked plot to assassinate Saudi Arabia’s ambassador in Washington has changed that thinking. [emphasis original]

Apparently, Peter King hasn’t read Holder’s legal defense of assassination in response to perceived threats.

More interesting still is the list of “US cases involving Hezbollah,” a list of 19 federal cases. One of the cases is the Scary Car Broker plot, in which the US-based business owners are not alleged to have known of any tie to Hezbollah (if, in fact, one exists).

Even worse, it includes US v. Chahine, the case against Nada Prouty’s brother-in-law Talal Chahine.

The government never accused Chahine of any ties to Hezbollah–not in any legal forum where they’d have to prove their case. Rather, they accused him (and got a guilty plea from Prouty’s sister) of tax evasion. While the tax evasion case was valid, the entire case derived from Prouty’s brother Fadi’s efforts to dig up a crime that would justify his service as an informant, which he was doing to beat his own weapons charges. That is, as so often happens, this was an instance of FBI trading one criminal charge for the hope of netting a terrorist. Along the way, Fadi convinced Chahine not to go clean on his tax evasion, presumably at the direction of the FBI. Ultimately, the only tie between Chahine and Hezbollah consisted of a radical cleric’s presence at a charity event benefiting orphans to which Chahine had donated And, as Prouty lays out, a 4-year investigation into Chahine never showed any ties to terrorism.

In fact, government records would later show that even after a second raid of Talal’s residence in September 2005, no actual evidence of terrorism was obtained, nor was incriminating evidence of terrorism ties ever found in the nearly four years of tapped phones, intercepted faxes, and closely monitored bank activities.

As Prouty also notes, the government let Chahine skip the country (Fadi had warned him he’d be indicted), which she suggests they wouldn’t have done if he were a legitimate terrorist threat.

So apparently, according to Peter King, any time a Lebanese immigrant commits tax evasion, it counts as a Hezbollah case.

As someone who has himself funded a terrorist group, King ought to know it takes more to fund terrorists than that.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

2 Responses to Peter King Uses Tax Evasion Case as Proof of Hezbollah Involvement in US

  • 1
  • 2
Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel @JasonLeopold Snide little fuckers, too.
8mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @JasonLeopold: NEW after I rpted CIA gave Centra $40M contract for vetting torture docs Centra removed bios of officials w/CIA ties http…
8mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV Hungry students on way over. Grill status: loaded. http://t.co/Djl2sjkdPN
14mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Ben Ferguson is basically a wind up assclown for @CNN. But guess he is less of a racist misogynous pig than Erick Erickson, so there is that
46mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Right. Lewinski, and cover he+his ilk give, is huge in the belligerent #OnlyCopLivesMatter attitude of police today. https://t.co/W4mgnIUgTz
55mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @Popehat: /1 Ron Rosenbaum's "Travels with Dr Death" concerned an expert who always testified convicted murderers were psychopaths who'd…
57mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @Popehat: /2 Bill Lewinski is like Dr. Death, except he always testifies cops acted appropriately, in any shooting. h/t @bmaz http://t.c…
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz junk into evidence to start with. That should not occur for a guy that has manufactured a fraud on the court for sale to cops/Govt 11/X
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz The real damage, same as was case in bite mark evidence cases https://t.co/wEs4QN3AQh comes from courts allowing the quack Lewinski 10/X
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz out and once they do that jurors tend to support the finely sandpapered govt/cop side of story. It is just what happens with juries 9/X
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz then counters with a sound expert, it doesn't overcome Lewinski's bullshit, it simply turns into a "battle of the experts" + jurors tune 8/X
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz well that he comes off sincere. Much as they train cops to present and lie well at LEO academies. When the party opposing the govt. 7/X
2hreplyretweetfavorite