5 Years of Data Not Collected by NSA

Just days after General Keith Alexander successfully dodged questions about the NSA’s massive new data storage facility by disclaiming any responsibility for collecting US person data, the National Counterterrorism Center is preparing to extend how long they can retain US person data to 5 years.

The Justice Department is close to approving guidelines that would allow the intelligence community to lengthen the period of time it retains information about U.S. residents, even if they have no known connection to terrorism.

Senior U.S. officials familiar with the guidelines said the changes would allow the National Counterterrorism Center, the intelligence community’s clearinghouse for counterterrorism data, to keep such information for up to five years.

Currently, the center must promptly destroy any information about U.S. citizens or residents unless a connection to terrorism is evident.

I guess if you’ve got all that data storage space in UT, you’re going to need something to fill it with.

To justify this power grab, the WaPo’s sources point to two attacks that had nothing to do with the length of data retention: the Nidal Hasan attack, in which information on his conversations with Anwar al-Awlaki hadn’t been shared throughout the government, and Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, in which his suspect status hadn’t been loaded into the no-fly list.

They don’t, however, point to a concrete example where 5 year old data of US persons might have helped solve an actual terror attack.

But thanks to this measure pushed through in almost complete secrecy, when they declare–say–your Church a terrorist organization in three year’s time, they’ll have records of your association with it in a database in UT.

Update: Here’s Charlie Savage on this. Here’s the new guidelines. And here’s the guidelines they replaced. I’ll come back to these later.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+2Email to someone

18 Responses to 5 Years of Data Not Collected by NSA

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz The Feds Feds targeted Denny Hastert, and then looked for the crime. Not exactly the proper use if US criminal law http://t.co/mkh3qMsedr
12mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz And how is Bahlul coming along? https://t.co/5zCPReJhNl
16mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @walterwkatz Russia has more reason than just their own significant corruption to be pissed, bc of that precedent. @ScottGreenfield
24mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @walterwkatz One big reason for EDNY, I think, is bc of JFK precedents like Bout. @ScottGreenfield
25mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz This is spot on: https://t.co/9drOYgC0ZJ
36mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @Taniel Liberals can't stand Kyrsten Sinema either, but she has far better statewide recognition+is a light years better campaigner than AK
37mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @Taniel I don't think Kirkpatrick can beat either McCain or Salmon. She has no statewide recognition, and most liberals don't care for her.
41mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Dissembling security+foreign policy stooge inadvertently proves in @WSJ why Edward Snowden is an international hero http://t.co/7agRcYSkHN
55mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @chriswnews: Plenty of extra security eyes outside #Phoenix Islamic ctr w/ a protest planned here later. #12News http://t.co/xM4y4C0iWd
58mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @ThePeoplesBacon Adelson = Hillary's oligarchs: Adelson's trained seals = Hillary @zappin_liberals @AaronMDellutri
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @zappin_liberals You geniuses forget that every trained seal Adelson bought for Bibi was also in office. @ThePeoplesBacon @AaronMDellutri
1hreplyretweetfavorite