5 Years of Data Not Collected by NSA

Just days after General Keith Alexander successfully dodged questions about the NSA’s massive new data storage facility by disclaiming any responsibility for collecting US person data, the National Counterterrorism Center is preparing to extend how long they can retain US person data to 5 years.

The Justice Department is close to approving guidelines that would allow the intelligence community to lengthen the period of time it retains information about U.S. residents, even if they have no known connection to terrorism.

Senior U.S. officials familiar with the guidelines said the changes would allow the National Counterterrorism Center, the intelligence community’s clearinghouse for counterterrorism data, to keep such information for up to five years.

Currently, the center must promptly destroy any information about U.S. citizens or residents unless a connection to terrorism is evident.

I guess if you’ve got all that data storage space in UT, you’re going to need something to fill it with.

To justify this power grab, the WaPo’s sources point to two attacks that had nothing to do with the length of data retention: the Nidal Hasan attack, in which information on his conversations with Anwar al-Awlaki hadn’t been shared throughout the government, and Umar Farouk Abdulmutallab, in which his suspect status hadn’t been loaded into the no-fly list.

They don’t, however, point to a concrete example where 5 year old data of US persons might have helped solve an actual terror attack.

But thanks to this measure pushed through in almost complete secrecy, when they declare–say–your Church a terrorist organization in three year’s time, they’ll have records of your association with it in a database in UT.

Update: Here’s Charlie Savage on this. Here’s the new guidelines. And here’s the guidelines they replaced. I’ll come back to these later.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+1Email to someone

18 Responses to 5 Years of Data Not Collected by NSA

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz @PhilPerspective Timely, cause I need a plummer.
6mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz No, I'm sorry @KimKarrdahsian1 I just don't give a fuck about being followed by a useless Kardashian, whether real or fake. All GTFO.
11mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Roger Goodell is a cheap ass fraud+the NFL the same. They play on, and crassly in, Glendale AZ and then rape the city blind. Scummy leeches.
15mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @TurboCourt By the way, I'll be right here if you want to make good on your belated entries. Want to talk? cc: @barrettmarson @KellyFlood3
54mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV Urban Meyer and Bill Belichick must be so proud of their product Aaron Hernandez as he gets more publicity today. Oh wait... #Enablers
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @MarkSZaidEsq Oh. Thanks. Mostly I was mocking the cries of injury, not making legal point. Guess wasn't clear @BradMossEsq @JesselynRadack
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @MarkSZaidEsq You're saying I should sue @BradMossEsq for defamation for saying I work for free? Well, you're the lawyer. @JesselynRadack
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @MarkSZaidEsq Nevermind. I've got work to do which @BradMossEsq apparently thinks I do for free. SLANDER! @JesselynRadack
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @MarkSZaidEsq Well, take it up with Hunt. I purposely did not use your name. @BradMossEsq @JesselynRadack
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @MarkSZaidEsq As I said when I write article NOT abt evidence jury heard, will include it! @BradMossEsq @JesselynRadack
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @MarkSZaidEsq You just told me I don't! Changed your mind? @BradMossEsq @JesselynRadack
1hreplyretweetfavorite