Did DOJ Ratchet Up the Charges Against Kiriakou Because of Poland Investigation?

When John Kiriakou was first charged with espionage, he was charged with four counts:

  • Leaking Covert Officer A’s identity under IIPA section B
  • Leaking Deuce Martinez’ identity under defense information clause of Espionage Act
  • Leaking Deuce Martinez’ tie to the torture program under defense information clause of Espionage Act
  • Lying to the CIA’s Publication Review Board; falsifying a material fact

In today’s indictment, Kiriakou was charged with five counts:

  • Leaking Covert Officer A’s identity under IIPA section A
  • Leaking Covert Officer A’s tie to the torture program under defense information clause of Espionage Act
  • Leaking Deuce Martinez’ identity under defense information clause of Espionage Act
  • Leaking Deuce Martinez’ tie to the torture program under defense information clause of Espionage Act
  • Lying to the CIA’s Publication Review Board; falsifying a material fact

Not only did they ratchet up the IIPA violation to one that carries a 10 year, as opposed to a 5 year, penalty, but they also added a violation of the Espionage Act tied to Covert Officer A’s ties to the torture program.

This is likely designed to punish Kiriakou for refusing to accept their plea deal.

But I also wonder whether it’s not a response to the reports that Poland will file charges against the officials who helped the CIA set up its torture prison in that country.

According to the complaint, the torture investigators never did anything with Covert Officer A’s identity (which they got via the journalist to whom Kiriakou provided the information). The FBI officer who wrote the affidavit wrote,

Neither Journalist A nor any other journalist to my knowledge has published the name of Covert Officer A.

The IIPA violation doesn’t require any intent of damage. Intentionally leaking the identity is enough. But the Espionage charge does:

Whoever, lawfully having possession of, access to, control, or being entrusted with any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, or note relating to the national defense, or information relating to the national defense which information the possessor has reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation, willfully communicates, delivers, transmits or causes to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted or attempts to communicate, deliver, transmit or cause to be communicated, delivered or transmitted the same to any person not entitled to receive it, or willfully retains the same and fails to deliver it on demand to the officer or employee of the United States entitled to receive it; [my emphasis]

That is, to make the Espionage charge tied to Covert Officer A stick, they’re going to have to prove that Kiriakou had reason to know that leaking his name (to a journalist, but ultimately, to lawyers for people who had been tortured by Covert Officer A) “could be used to the injury of the United States.”

Are they really preparing to argue that helping men mount a fair defense in court injures the United States? That ensuring our legal system works the way it is supposed to work, rather than the way the kangaroo courts at Gitmo have been set up, hurts this country?

Or, alternately, are they going to build their “injury” theory on the Polish tie–on Deuce Martinez’ and (possibly) Covert Officer A’s involvement on Polish soil (if he was, in fact, there)?

They may well just be punishing Kiriakou for putting them to the trouble of involving journalists and CIPA and exposure of their torture program. But I wouldn’t be surprised if they pointed to Poland’s disinterest in cooperating in any more illegal covert activities with us as the “injury” that Kiriakou’s alleged leaks have cause.

Tweet about this on Twitter11Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook8Google+0Email to someone

5 Responses to Did DOJ Ratchet Up the Charges Against Kiriakou Because of Poland Investigation?

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Emptywheel Twitterverse
JimWhiteGNV It may be Talk Like a Pirate Day for the rest of us, but for the privateers on Wall Street, every day is Act Like a Pirate Day.
10mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @imraansiddiqi: Bill Montgomery's Anti-Muslim Seminar Results in Threats to Muslims, Phoenix PD Will Not Participate http://t.co/zEabqCI
23mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV RT @NickKristof: Interesting RT @CoryBooker: Revoke NFL Nonprofit Status Give Funds to #DomesticAbuse Prevention http://t.co/qLhWsMvSp2
23mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @Mansfield2016: Despite having 6 years of Senate majority, Obama's failure rate for judicial noms still higher than GWB & Reagan. http:/…
30mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @jazgar @JoshuaHol Also blames the woman and her husband. Bundy is a truly horrible human being.
35mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @LukeRussert @pareene I am #satisfied you are a blithering idiot Little Boy Luke.
41mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV RT @lrozen: The plenary has begun, State dept says #irantalks
52mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @Krhawkins5 Don't white whale! It leads to blind spots. Whale is being hidden by school of fish @onekade @jilliancyork @JameelJaffer @cia
1hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @BradMossEsq @JesselynRadack @radleybalko Bullshit, the original surveillance NOT just Posse Commitatus violation, but 4th too.
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @mlcalderone: Bush admin tried linking Saddam to Al Qaeda in rush to war. Now Obama admin pushing ISIS/AQ link to justify its war: http:…
2hreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV Funding Hapless Mission to Train Syrian Rebels Increases Value of Saudi Terror Hedge Fund http://t.co/gSZFuS48Q9
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @MikeSacksEsq They wouldn't let me pre-order at the price yet.
2hreplyretweetfavorite
April 2012
S M T W T F S
« Mar   May »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930