Did DOJ Ratchet Up the Charges Against Kiriakou Because of Poland Investigation?

When John Kiriakou was first charged with espionage, he was charged with four counts:

  • Leaking Covert Officer A’s identity under IIPA section B
  • Leaking Deuce Martinez’ identity under defense information clause of Espionage Act
  • Leaking Deuce Martinez’ tie to the torture program under defense information clause of Espionage Act
  • Lying to the CIA’s Publication Review Board; falsifying a material fact

In today’s indictment, Kiriakou was charged with five counts:

  • Leaking Covert Officer A’s identity under IIPA section A
  • Leaking Covert Officer A’s tie to the torture program under defense information clause of Espionage Act
  • Leaking Deuce Martinez’ identity under defense information clause of Espionage Act
  • Leaking Deuce Martinez’ tie to the torture program under defense information clause of Espionage Act
  • Lying to the CIA’s Publication Review Board; falsifying a material fact

Not only did they ratchet up the IIPA violation to one that carries a 10 year, as opposed to a 5 year, penalty, but they also added a violation of the Espionage Act tied to Covert Officer A’s ties to the torture program.

This is likely designed to punish Kiriakou for refusing to accept their plea deal.

But I also wonder whether it’s not a response to the reports that Poland will file charges against the officials who helped the CIA set up its torture prison in that country.

According to the complaint, the torture investigators never did anything with Covert Officer A’s identity (which they got via the journalist to whom Kiriakou provided the information). The FBI officer who wrote the affidavit wrote,

Neither Journalist A nor any other journalist to my knowledge has published the name of Covert Officer A.

The IIPA violation doesn’t require any intent of damage. Intentionally leaking the identity is enough. But the Espionage charge does:

Whoever, lawfully having possession of, access to, control, or being entrusted with any document, writing, code book, signal book, sketch, photograph, photographic negative, blueprint, plan, map, model, instrument, appliance, or note relating to the national defense, or information relating to the national defense which information the possessor has reason to believe could be used to the injury of the United States or to the advantage of any foreign nation, willfully communicates, delivers, transmits or causes to be communicated, delivered, or transmitted or attempts to communicate, deliver, transmit or cause to be communicated, delivered or transmitted the same to any person not entitled to receive it, or willfully retains the same and fails to deliver it on demand to the officer or employee of the United States entitled to receive it; [my emphasis]

That is, to make the Espionage charge tied to Covert Officer A stick, they’re going to have to prove that Kiriakou had reason to know that leaking his name (to a journalist, but ultimately, to lawyers for people who had been tortured by Covert Officer A) “could be used to the injury of the United States.”

Are they really preparing to argue that helping men mount a fair defense in court injures the United States? That ensuring our legal system works the way it is supposed to work, rather than the way the kangaroo courts at Gitmo have been set up, hurts this country?

Or, alternately, are they going to build their “injury” theory on the Polish tie–on Deuce Martinez’ and (possibly) Covert Officer A’s involvement on Polish soil (if he was, in fact, there)?

They may well just be punishing Kiriakou for putting them to the trouble of involving journalists and CIPA and exposure of their torture program. But I wouldn’t be surprised if they pointed to Poland’s disinterest in cooperating in any more illegal covert activities with us as the “injury” that Kiriakou’s alleged leaks have cause.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

5 Responses to Did DOJ Ratchet Up the Charges Against Kiriakou Because of Poland Investigation?

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz @Travis_Waldron Come on out, I have a spare room. it's going to be 75º today. We are temporarily the sports mecca w/SuperBowl + Phoenix Open
15mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @Travis_Waldron I know, right? I feel bad.
21mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV RT @TechBrigade: Moral Mondays brings diverse groups together - http://t.co/w3TnNhlgbE http://t.co/HqchEMyYcV
26mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Subways will run empty overnight during snowstorm, source says http://t.co/D073wAFIsH Andrew Cuomo is a horrible human being Part 3,297
28mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz How is Snowmygod going there in the east? Did @Ali_Gharib survive, and what is he burning in the fireplace now?
34mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @bsdtectr @MikeAndMike I'm telling you, it's tough!
43mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @MasaccioEW @caidid @robertcaruso That's cause nobody goes to Glendale for anything but the game. Everything else in Scottsdale+Phoenix.
51mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz The ESPN set, with @MikeAndMike on it, is about a mile away in Scottsdale, but at 58º its just too cold to get out of bed and go down there
53mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @onekade Dog is thinking, "Goddamnit Alpha! It's bad enough I have to share my bed with this ... thing, but pictures?!?! On Twitter?!?!"
9hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @xeni Or, heck, in flyover country. Or even far worse snow in Buffalo (which admittedly can handle it better).
9hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @ColMorrisDavis Cause Petraeus is such a woos that 2 years of the treatment Sterling has taken for 12 will is "enough"? @JasonLeopold
9hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @JasonLeopold: Does @SenFeinstein think former CIA officer Jeffrey Sterling suffered enough?
9hreplyretweetfavorite
April 2012
S M T W T F S
« Mar   May »
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930