DOD: Consider Whether We’ve Made Detainees Crazy in Periodical Review

Section 1023 of the Defense Authorization mandated that the Administration tell Congress how it was implementing Obama’s Executive Order providing periodic review of Gitmo detainees’ continued need to be detained.

SEC. 1023. PROCEDURES FOR PERIODIC DETENTION REVIEW OF INDIVIDUALS DETAINED AT UNITED STATES NAVAL STATION, GUANTANAMO BAY, CUBA.

(a) PROCEDURES REQUIRED.—Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, the Secretary of Defense shall submit to the appropriate committees of Congress a report setting forth procedures for implementing the periodic review process required by Executive Order No. 13567 for individuals detained at United States Naval Station, Guantanamo Bay, Cuba, pursuant to the Authorization for Use of Military Force (Public Law 107–40; 50 U.S.C. 1541 note).

Here’s the directive complying with that requirement.

I’ll have plenty to say about it. But for the moment, I got hung up on this:

3. STANDARD. Continued law of war detention is warranted for a detainee subject to periodic review if such detention is necessary to protect against a continuing significant threat to the security of the United States. In making that assessment, the PRB may review all relevant materials including information from the final Task Force assessments produced pursuant to Reference (k); the work product of a prior PRB; or any relevant intelligence produced subsequent to either. Application of this standard is specifically not intended to require a re-examination of the underlying materials that supported the work products of either Reference (k) or a prior PRB and is not intended to create a requirement that each PRB conduct a zero-based review of all original source materials concerning a detainee. In assessing whether a detainee continues to meet this standard, the PRB may consider:

[snip]

(6) The detainee’s physical and psychological condition.

We know, of course, that there are a number of people at Gitmo–starting with Abu Zubaydah and Mohammed al-Qahtani–we’ve driven completely insane with our torture and abuse, who we can’t try but also can’t release (not that we’d release either of these two anyway).

But this seems to be a tacit admission that we won’t release people we’ve driven crazy. Because, Freedom!, I guess. So are we now saying that because our treatment has made them insane we will now use that as reason to keep them in custody?

Though maybe once these guys get to be so old they’re having health problems, maybe then we’ll finally release them.

Tweet about this on TwitterShare on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

9 Responses to DOD: Consider Whether We’ve Made Detainees Crazy in Periodical Review

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel Mike Bloomberg says the public deserves "a lot better" than what we're getting as POTUS candidates and he apparently thinks he is better.
1mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @normative: Well, I guess there are SOME fluids Michigan cares about policing. https://t.co/VsmuNSJhyP
4mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Mike Bloomberg leaking his presidential run to a British outlet, not, say, the US one that bears his name. https://t.co/PFKky5axxR
6mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Subpoena his ass. https://t.co/9eHX9KXoZ9
8mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @ryanlcooper @pareene Yeah, shocker. Between Bill going rogue asshole again, and now Penn, little wonder the campaign is going off the rails
10mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @joesbooksthings It's your opinion that GOP should get no Qs after GOP Gov's handpicked EM poisoned a city of children? @NormOrnstein
21mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @NormOrnstein: Last GOP debate, foci on meaning of pro-life and 10th Amendment. No. Of Qs on Flint: zero. Political malpractice by ABC m…
24mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @ZoeTillman: 6th Circuit okays warrantless use of camera attached to a public utitliy pole to monitor man's activity for 10 weeks https:…
36mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @LynnRWebsterMD: Senator scrutinizes pharma links on government pain panel https://t.co/J4k8zU9mHN via @usnews Please also ensure payers…
38mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Uber Is Not the Future of Work https://t.co/fkq4FG4pkP
2hreplyretweetfavorite