9th Circuit: No Way to Punish the Government If They Illegally Collect (But Don’t Use) Your Telecommunications

As Josh Gerstein just reported, the 9th Circuit has thrown out a decision against the government in the al-Haramain wiretapping suit. While they don’t comment on Judge Vaughn Walker’s judgement that al-Haramain had standing and had proven they had been spied on, the panel ultimately held that for the alleged actions–collecting al-Haramain’s telecommunications–the government has sovereign immunity. Al-Haramain can only sue individuals, not the government.

The ruling sucks for al-Haramain. But it has larger implications. Effectively, the 9th Circuit is saying there’s no way to hold the government accountable for simply collecting your telecommunications illegally; you can only hold them accountable if they use that information in a trial.

It distinguishes those two activities this way, pointing to language that specifically invokes the United States as a defendant in case of 1806 (use in an official proceeding) but not 1810 (collection).

Contrasting § 1810 liability, for which sovereign immunity is not explicitly waived, with § 1806 liability, for which it is, also illuminates congressional purpose. Liability under the two sections, while similar in its reach, is not identical. Section 1806, combined with 18 U.S.C. § 2712, renders the United States liable only for the “use[ ] and disclos[ure]” of information “by Federal officers and employees” in an unlawful manner. Section 1810, by contrast, also creates liability for the actual collection of the information in the first place, targeting “electronic surveillance or . . . disclos[ure] or use[ ]” of that information. (emphasis added). Under this scheme, Al-Haramain can bring a suit for damages against the United States for use of the collected information, but cannot bring suit against the government for collection of the information itself. Cf. ACLU v. NSA, 493 F.3d 644, 671 (6th Cir. 2007) (Lead Opinion of Batchelder, J.) (noting that FISA potentially allows limitless information collection upon issuance of warrant, but limits use and dissemination of information under, inter alia, § 1806(a)). Although such a structure may seem anomalous and even unfair, the policy judgment is one for Congress, not the courts. Also, because governmental liability remains under § 1806, the district court’s concern that FISA relief would become a dead letter is not valid. See In re Nat’l Sec. Agency Telecomms. Records Litig., 564 F. Supp. 2d at 1125.

[snip]

Congress can and did waive sovereign immunity with respect to violations for which it wished to render the United States liable. It deliberately did not waive immunity with respect to § 1810, and the district court erred by imputing an implied waiver. Al Haramain’s suit for damages against the United States may not proceed under § 1810.

Because al-Haramain, at a time when Vaughn Walker was using 1810 to get by the government’s State Secrets invocation, said “it was not proceeding under other sections of FISA,” its existing claim is limited to 1810. The government used the information collected–in a secret process that ended up declaring al-Haramain a terrorist supporter–but not in a trial, and therefore not in a way al-Haramain can easily hold the government liable for.

The implication, of course, is that all the rest of the collection the government engages in–of all of us, not just al-Haramain–also escapes all accountability. So long as the government never uses the information itself–even if the entire rest of their case is based on illegally collected information (as it was in, at a minimum, al-Haramain’s terrorist designation)–a person cannot hold the government itself responsible.

The people who can be held accountable? The non-governmental or non law enforcement persons who conduct the surveillance.

But of course, they–the telecoms–have already been granted immunity.

Tweet about this on TwitterShare on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

10 Responses to 9th Circuit: No Way to Punish the Government If They Illegally Collect (But Don’t Use) Your Telecommunications

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz @joshgerstein Yeah,I agree. Have to do it now, and the optics and logistics of doing it so fast just don't work.
9mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @laRosalind @emptywheel Gonna send you some Boxcar Willie albums!
8hreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV RT @kirkmurphy: If any of #GOPDebate were my patients my license would be revoked for incompetence. https://t.co/AsuBSzzmhr
8hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @laRosalind @emptywheel But just winds? No trains? In that vein, there are No Trains To Heaven, you know https://t.co/3elkVGixH0
8hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz So all the schlubs but Trump were out shaking hands and kibitzing on stage in afterglow, and Trumpster was gone baby gone??
9hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @JONF34 I'm saying at least 20 years late. Long enough that that wet behind the ears probie doesn't even understand.
9hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RubioBot2000 still doesn't grok that the New American Century Project is so late 90's.
9hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @laRosalind @emptywheel FWIW, I don't think even Sri would get through. Though, honestly, the GOP would prob be smart to confirm such a nom.
9hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @laRosalind @emptywheel Girl, go wash everything out stat. Are you by the water currently??
9hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RubioBot2000 coughs up some Reagan hairballs
9hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @emptywheel @ddayen Uh, where I come from, a $300 bottle of Chandon is actually called Dom.
9hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Rubio "You can't have free enterprise w/o anti-poverty programs." That's a curious claim. Also invokes Nikki Haley.
9hreplyretweetfavorite
August 2012
S M T W T F S
« Jul   Sep »
 1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031