Right to Work Coming to Michigan

In all likelihood, Michigan will be a right to work state by this time next week.

There have been rumors of such a development for about a week … and near certainty the GOP-dominated legislature would pass laws gutting unions (particularly teachers’ unions, along with public education) in the lame duck session. But reports are right-to-work will come to the floor tomorrow. It’ll pass the House easily. It will probably pass the Senate (Dems were just beginning to pressure State Senators not to pass it; this quick trigger will short-circuit that effort). And while Rick Snyder has equivocated on whether or not he will veto it, it seems quite likely he will sign it.

All this comes on the heels of unions’ failed effort to enshrine collective bargaining in the state constitution, which moneyed interests defeated with ads asserting, simply, it would be dangerous, and for which unions failed (IMHO) to generate support outside of union households.

And while some observers suggest this will set off another effort to overturn the right to work legislation, for the short term, at least, it will add Michigan to those states that are racing to the bottom, offering under-educated workers for low wages rather than better educated, more stable workers.

Happy Holidays, everyone!

Tweet about this on Twitter17Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook25Google+0Email to someone

9 Responses to Right to Work Coming to Michigan

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9

Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz RT @kevinjonheller: By “constructive engagement,” the oft-embarrassing @AmbassadorPower means “give #Israel everything it wants.” http://t.…
5mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel But trust me--the belly button redefinition of relevance is not a rubber stamp court.
6mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Then Claire Eagan cited 2010 Bates PRTT that cited 2006 no opinion relying on 2004 K-K thin air opinion. Voila! Foundational law.
7mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Still laughing that FISC's idea of precedents is: 2004 PRTT expands relevance out of thin air 2006 BRFISA, no opinion 2010 Bates cites 2006
8mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @TimothyS Which is a 5 year improvement off current performance!!! http://t.co/lBIKKBAb1V So count your blessings, you ingrate!
12mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @TimothyS: TRANSPARENCY 101 The NSA just told me they need at least 4 more years to tell me when they will complete a FOIA request filed…
13mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @HayesBrown That was very first statement, wasn't it? Very interesting. Thanks. Considering poss video was made earlier, only released now
24mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @MikeScarcella: DC Circuit today sets NSA surveillance oral argument for Nov. 4. Members of three-judge panel not yet announced http://t…
35mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @HayesBrown: I didn't see the vid. Which speech of Obama's did they show? 9th? 14th? 18th?
36mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel We okra appreciators will surely take over the world soon RT @nlanc: @EatYourBooks So good that I'm off to farmers' market for more okra!
44mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV RT @brycecovert: No American is guaranteed paid time off, but even those who get it are too stressed to take it http://t.co/lqhTi3bfoD
48mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV RT @mrosenbergNYT: NYT has not received expulsion order. Unclear if AG has right to issue order. We remain eager to cooperate w/in bounds o…
52mreplyretweetfavorite
November 2012
S M T W T F S
« Oct   Dec »
 123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
252627282930