Judge Invokes Alice in Wonderland in Denying NYT and ACLU Targeted Killing FOIAs

“YOU’D better not talk!’ said Five. ‘I heard the Queen say only yesterday you deserved to be beheaded!’

‘What for?’ said the one who had spoken first.

‘That’s none of YOUR business, Two!’ said Seven.

[snip]

‘And who are THESE?’ said the Queen, pointing to the three gardeners who were lying round the rosetree; for, you see, as they were lying on their faces, and the pattern on their backs was the same as the rest of the pack, she could not tell whether they were gardeners, or soldiers, or courtiers, or three of her own children.

‘How should I know?’ said Alice, surprised at her own courage. ‘It’s no business of MINE.’

The Queen turned crimson with fury, and, after glaring at her for a moment like a wild beast, screamed ‘Off with her head! Off—’

Alice in Wonderland

 

The Alice-in-Wonderland nature of this pronouncement is not lost on me; but after careful consideration, I find myself stuck in a paradoxical situation in which I cannot solve a problem because of contradictory constraints and rules–a veritable Catch-22. I can find no way around the thicket of laws and precedents that effectively allow the Executive Branch of our Government to proclaim as perfectly lawful certain actions that seem on their face incompatible with our Constitution and laws, while keeping reasons for their conclusion a secret.

Judge Colleen McMahon’s decision denying ACLU and NYT FOIA for targeted killing rationale NYT already published and government repeatedly discussed

 

 

Tweet about this on TwitterShare on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+1Email to someone

5 Responses to Judge Invokes Alice in Wonderland in Denying NYT and ACLU Targeted Killing FOIAs

Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz @PhilPerspective @emptywheel I was actually up there working at Copper Mountain and Keystone ski resorts when Morton took Broncs to first SB
10mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz What took so long?? Mick, Keith and the Stones tell Trump to bugger off and quit using their music https://t.co/6LcQj4LL39 via @TMZ
14mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @ejmontini: Montini: The Legislature actually DID this: $5 million for billionaires; $0 for needy children https://t.co/l1s9yinCmM via @…
48mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @JRSigety @IanPGunn Right. I wonder to what extent Crowley will continue to be "cooperative" and "available".
58mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @JRSigety @IanPGunn Yeah, I noticed!
59mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @JRSigety @IanPGunn And, if so, are DV/Family offenses eligible?
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @JRSigety @IanPGunn I know, was just kidding around! The spectacle ought be hilarious. Does this court have a standard diversion offer?
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @IanPGunn @JRSigety ...would simply mail me a pre-trial conf date for 30-45 days out. Neither atty nor defendant would appear.
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @IanPGunn @JRSigety True! Cracks me up they even need to do this in TX. Here I'd fax in a notice of appearance/not guilty plea and court...
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @JRSigety @IanPGunn I admire the go git em attitude, but you are going to live tweet a stinking misdemeanor arraignment?? Heh.
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @joshgerstein @johngramlich Come on Josh, this will make things peachy again!
2hreplyretweetfavorite
January 2013
S M T W T F S
« Dec   Feb »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031