Shorter DOJ: It’s No Big Deal if DEA Agents Destroy Evidence

DOJ’s Inspector General wrote Senators Collins and Lieberman a letter summarizing its investigation into DEA Agents involved in the Secret Service sex scandal in Cartagena, Colombia.

What’s getting attention is that the DEA agents arranged a prostitute for a SS Agent. All three engaged sex workers the night in question.

But what should be getting attention is that the DEA agents, when they learned about the scope of the investigation, deleted incriminating information from their Blackberries. And DOJ–in part because it conducted compelled interviews it knew couldn’t be used in a prosecution–won’t charge them.

The OIG investigation found further that all three DEA agents had deleted data from their DEA issued Blackberry devices, and that DEA agents #1 and #2 did so after learning of the scope and nature of the OIG’s investigation. DEA agent #1 admitted to the OIG that he deleted relevant data from his Blackberry after being requested to surrender his device to the OIG. DEA agent #2 stated that he “wiped” all data from his Blackberry before providing it to the OIG, but denied that he intended to obstruct the OIG investigation. He stated that he wiped all data from his Blackberry in an effort to conceal embarrassing communications between him and his wife.

The investigation was an administrative review and all of the interviews of the DEA agents were compelled. Given all of those facts and circumstances, we did not view the matter to warrant criminal prosecution.

By compelling the interviews, the IG effectively immunized the DEA Agents, ensuring they could not be charged with obstruction. Not to mention, the Scott Bloch precedent–in which he deleted evidence and now DOJ is bending over backward to make sure he doesn’t pay any price for lying about doing so–makes it clear that DOJ will never prosecute one of its own for the kind of crime they prosecute others for all the time.

Still, let it be know that DOJ doesn’t give a shit that its DEA Agents obstruct justice and delete evidence.

Tweet about this on Twitter15Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook2Google+0Email to someone

8 Responses to Shorter DOJ: It’s No Big Deal if DEA Agents Destroy Evidence

Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel RT @RonWyden: Working with @MarkUdall to strengthen surveillance reform & end backdoor search loophole #EndThisDragnet http://t.co/Wdg0Ja1k
38sreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @KevinBankston Doesn't it have to get by Mikulski (D-NSA) in any case? @NadiaKayyali @astepanovich
2mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel I think @jamesrbuk has just invented the Super Injunction Canary. Or perhaps Stork.
3mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV Huge loss, so sad: "Sierra Leone's top Ebola doctor dies from virus" http://t.co/hUh5TNISVt via @reuters
6mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @KevinBankston Lose Verizon willingness to go along with the bill. They're the make or break provider, it seems to me. @Krhawkins5
8mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @MikeScarcella: Judge permits DOJ to file secret declarations in FOIA suit over the govt's investigation of @wikileaks supporters: https…
11mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @JimWhiteGNV I actually thought his graduation speech there was pretty good.
11mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @robertcaruso Guess that explains why Commander McWherter had to go recently.
12mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @KevinBankston Seriously, they'd lose VZ and w/o VZ you don't have a dragnet. @Krhawkins5
13mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @onekade And so you ate a head-sized donut to prepare to see her again?
16mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @KevinBankston Or maybe the IC is happy accessing address books as a connection. ;p (And also knows they'd lose VZ) @Krhawkins5
17mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @onekade LOL. Now you're gonna pass out in 3...2... ZZZZzzzzzz
19mreplyretweetfavorite
January 2013
S M T W T F S
« Dec   Feb »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031