John Brennan’s Rules: John Brennan Doesn’t Have to Play by the Rules

While I’m happy about the news that John Brennan, the Moral Rectitude Drone Assassination Czar, managed to finish his Drone Rules before he left to become CIA Director, I laughed my ass off when I read this.

U.S. officials said the effort to draft the playbook was nearly derailed late last year by disagreements among the State Department, the CIA and the Pentagon on the criteria for lethal strikes and other issues. Granting the CIA a temporary exemption for its Pakistan operations was described as a compromise that allowed officials to move forward with other parts of the playbook.

The decision to allow the CIA strikes to continue was driven in part by concern that the window for weakening al-Qaeda and the Taliban in Pakistan is beginning to close, with plans to pull most U.S. troops out of neighboring Afghanistan over the next two years. CIA drones are flown out of bases in Afghanistan.

“There’s a sense that you put the pedal to the metal now, especially given the impending” withdrawal, said a former U.S. official involved in discussions of the playbook. The CIA exception is expected to be in effect for “less than two years but more than one,” the former official said, although he noted that any decision to close the carve-out “will undoubtedly be predicated on facts on the ground.”

Sure enough, writing a rule book that included a giant exemption was premised on the notion that the Moral Rectitude Drone Assassination Czar doesn’t need rules.

Officials said concerns about the CIA exemption were allayed to some extent by Obama’s decision to nominate Brennan, the principal author of the playbook, to run the CIA.

So glad we’re sending a guy who already can’t play by his own rules to run the Agency. Just what the CIA needs!

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+2Email to someone

9 Responses to John Brennan’s Rules: John Brennan Doesn’t Have to Play by the Rules

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel @siestadrive There was interesting discussion abt doing an IRV poll to make this crapshoot more sensible. I might do that. @SamWangPhD
2mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @armandodkos: "Pick a drug law you don’t like and thank Sen. Joe Biden". He deserves credit for racially disproportionate impact of drug…
11mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @armandodkos: Jeralyn discusses Biden's awful record on crime issues // Joe Biden's Plans Have Long Roots http://t.co/6EFOlYUvrq via @Ta
17mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz They shouldn't. Not to mention that Biden is horrid on law+order/crime reform issues. @Sherry_Reson @downwithtyranny https://t.co/25b4P2XaEA
19mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @JamesWolcott: "Moments from now Republican hopeful Donald Trump will be faxing us directly from Elvis Presley's home in Memphis."
28mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @PogoWasRight Well, theoretically, yes. But courts let this junk in all the time when it supports the government and cops.
55mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Lewinski is not a doctor, not even a licensed psychologist. Just a cop loving charlatan for sale. https://t.co/bANRY60qA3
1hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @macfathom: Excellent piece on Bill Lewinski by @mattapuzzo: http://t.co/DnX6CC52oT. For more on Lewinski, see my 2010 story: http://t.c…
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Why are they even having Koch begfest? Haven't they already declared Walker their guy?
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @RyanLizza To be able to push back against appearance that all Dems support broad criminal justice reform?
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Is it me, or does Marist misunderstand how polls are ALWAYS used in Presidential politics? http://t.co/rq0NVTNjW0
2hreplyretweetfavorite
January 2013
S M T W T F S
« Dec   Feb »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031