CIA’s Torturers Get Their Scalp
With the news that John Kiriakou will head to prison for 30 months, it’s worth remembering how he got sent there.
It started when CIA officers claimed that when Gitmo defense attorneys provided photos of their clients torturers to them–having independently discovered their identity–the torturers were put at risk. DOJ didn’t believe it was a security risk; CIA disagreed and went to John Brennan. And after Patrick Fitzgerald was brought in to mediate between DOJ and CIA, the prosecution of John Kiriakou resulted.
As a reminder of where this all started, it’s worth reading this March 15, 2010 Bill Gertz article which was, AFAIK, the first public report of the investigation into the John Adams Project. It describes a March 9, 2010 meeting between Fitzgerald and the CIA.
The dispute prompted a meeting Tuesday at CIA headquarters between U.S. Attorney Patrick J. Fitzgerald and senior CIA counterintelligence officials. It is the latest battle between the agency and the department over detainees and interrogations of terrorists.
According to U.S. officials familiar with the issue, the current dispute involves Justice Department officials who support an effort led by the American Civil Liberties Union to provide legal aid to military lawyers for the Guantanamo inmates. CIA counterintelligence officials oppose the effort and say giving terrorists photographs of interrogators has exposed CIA personnel and their families to possible terrorist attacks.
According to the officials, the dispute centered on discussions for a interagency memorandum that was to be used in briefing President Obama and senior administration officials on the photographs found in Cuba. Justice officials did not share the CIA’s security concerns about the risks posed to CIA interrogators and opposed language on the matter that was contained in the draft memorandum. The memo was being prepared for White House National Security Council aide John Brennan, who was to use it to brief the president.
The CIA insisted on keeping its language describing the case and wanted the memorandum sent forward in that form.
That meeting, of course, would have taken place the day after Fitzgerald was appointed. So immediately after Fitzgerald got put in charge of this investigation, he presumably moderated a fight between DOJ, which didn’t think detainee lawyers pursuing their clients’ torturers via independent means threatened to expose the torturers’ identity directly, and CIA, which apparently claimed to be worried.
What happened with Kiriakou’s sentencing today is many things. But it started as–and is still fundamentally a result of–an effort on the part of CIA to ensure that none of its torturers ever be held accountable for their acts, to ensure that the subjects of their torture never gain any legal foothold to hold them accountable.
The CIA has succeeded in making an object lesson of a man who betrayed their omerta.
From the NY Times article linked to above:
Jeeze, Brinkma seems to be a letter of the law type.
Would that she show and speak identical feelings towards the Bush/Obama administrations which violated laws to engage in torture in the name of national security. It is easier for Brinkma to ignore that morass.
Suspension of Habeas Corpus, no prosecution for war crimes, unfettered wiretapping and surveillance and all encompassing National Security protections for the power elite. Sounds like the USSR before Yeltsin.
NY Times headline, Judge says 30 months is “way too light”. Another judge bought, sold, delivered. This judge is so bad she insults the intelligence of idiots and should be refused a license to procreate.
Besides I thought all the interrogators weren’t government employees just contractors… or was that just the interrogation technique providers.
Patrick Fitzgerald protects the psycho assassins and torturers and war mongers, as always.