CIA’s Torturers Get Their Scalp

With the news that John Kiriakou will head to prison for 30 months, it’s worth remembering how he got sent there.

It started when CIA officers claimed that when Gitmo defense attorneys provided photos of their clients torturers to them–having independently discovered their identity–the torturers were put at risk. DOJ didn’t believe it was a security risk; CIA disagreed and went to John Brennan. And after Patrick Fitzgerald was brought in to mediate between DOJ and CIA, the prosecution of John Kiriakou resulted.

As a reminder of where this all started, it’s worth reading this March 15, 2010 Bill Gertz article which was, AFAIK, the first public report of the investigation into the John Adams Project. It describes a March 9, 2010 meeting between Fitzgerald and the CIA.

The dispute prompted a meeting Tuesday at CIA headquarters between U.S. Attorney Patrick J. Fitzgerald and senior CIA counterintelligence officials. It is the latest battle between the agency and the department over detainees and interrogations of terrorists.

[snip]

According to U.S. officials familiar with the issue, the current dispute involves Justice Department officials who support an effort led by the American Civil Liberties Union to provide legal aid to military lawyers for the Guantanamo inmates. CIA counterintelligence officials oppose the effort and say giving terrorists photographs of interrogators has exposed CIA personnel and their families to possible terrorist attacks.

[snip]

According to the officials, the dispute centered on discussions for a interagency memorandum that was to be used in briefing President Obama and senior administration officials on the photographs found in Cuba. Justice officials did not share the CIA’s security concerns about the risks posed to CIA interrogators and opposed language on the matter that was contained in the draft memorandum. The memo was being prepared for White House National Security Council aide John Brennan, who was to use it to brief the president.

The CIA insisted on keeping its language describing the case and wanted the memorandum sent forward in that form.

That meeting, of course, would have taken place the day after Fitzgerald was appointed. So immediately after Fitzgerald got put in charge of this investigation, he presumably moderated a fight between DOJ, which didn’t think detainee lawyers pursuing their clients’ torturers via independent means threatened to expose the torturers’ identity directly, and CIA, which apparently claimed to be worried.

What happened with Kiriakou’s sentencing today is many things. But it started as–and is still fundamentally a result of–an effort on the part of CIA to ensure that none of its torturers ever be held accountable for their acts, to ensure that the subjects of their torture never gain any legal foothold to hold them accountable.

The CIA has succeeded in making an object lesson of a man who betrayed their omerta.

Tweet about this on Twitter3Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook8Google+2Email to someone

4 Responses to CIA’s Torturers Get Their Scalp

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4

Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel @ChristopherAnn3 Were you in charge of keeping the weird priesthood alive so we can fight this monstrosity?
53sreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @billmon1 Millions of orcs are constructing evil tweets in a white tower.
2mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @ggreenwald Man, couldn't @rdevro have at least done a Rick Perry like smiling glamour mugshot??
8mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @rickhasen @mgsledge @ryanjreilly @mzzmariah October 2013. World Series.
12mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Did you also notice that chill that swept through Twitter about an hour ago? https://t.co/PbiR0YI6gW
45mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @Travis_Waldron And while they're at it, I've been married 20 years and that's, you know, old and boring too.
46mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @Travis_Waldron My daughter's 19 so too old to attract as many rich people as I need to get richer.
48mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @Travis_Waldron Wait. Just did the math. He HAS a kid who's 19. Is he ready to bulldoze his daughter for a new one too?
51mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @Atrios I did have that thought when I read the story. Prolly why even I will never be a female senator.
54mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @Travis_Waldron Assuming his children are younger than his 20 yr marriage. But what will he do when they turn 17?
55mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @JPughMI: New poll shows @MarkSchauer expanding his lead among women, to 52-37 http://t.co/1gkp6dOX4S #TeamSchauer #TeamMDP
59mreplyretweetfavorite
January 2013
S M T W T F S
« Dec   Feb »
 12345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031