Democrats Refuse Non-Binding Resolution Limiting Presidential Drones against Non-Combatants, Too

I noted earlier that Eric Holder suggested that a law prohibiting the use of drones against non-combatant Americans in the US would be unconstitutional.

Grassley: Do you believe Congress has the Constitutional authority to pass a law prohibiting the President’s authority to use drone aircraft to use lethal force against Americans on US soil and if not, why not?

Holder: I’m not sure that such a bill would be constitutional. It might run contrary to the Article II powers that the President has.

That’s interesting background for a move Rand Paul tried at roughly hour 8 of his filibuster.

He proposed a non-binding resolution saying precisely what Grassley had laid out 10 hour earlier, voicing the position of the Senate to be opposed to the “use of drones to target Americans on American soil who pose no imminent threat.”

As I understand it, the resolution was independent from the Brennan nomination (so it would not disrupt that, aside from a vote).

But — as just one of two Democrats to show up during this filibuster (Ron Wyden showed up in support during the 3:00 hour) — Dick Durbin showed up to oppose Paul’s unanimous consent to call for that resolution.

Durbin promised his subcommittee of the Senate Judiciary Committee would hold a hearing on drones. Nevertheless, he objected to Paul’s resolution. He suggested more Constitutional review of this simple measure was needed.

A leader of the Democratic party (and the President’s fellow Chicagoan) opposed a non-binding resolution prohibiting the use of drones in the US against non-combatants out of Constitutional concerns.

I’ve got a lot of theories why that might be. A belief this is all about making trouble for another nomination. insistence that nothing limit potential Article II claims.

But I keep thinking about the fact that there’s a wrongful death suit out there, with state secrets as the fallback claim crumbling with the public discussion.

Tweet about this on Twitter28Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook28Google+2Email to someone

9 Responses to Democrats Refuse Non-Binding Resolution Limiting Presidential Drones against Non-Combatants, Too

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9

Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz RT @petersuderman: Costco brand bourbon is, in fact, totally decent. http://t.co/1rhMoW3kH6
17mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @Ali_Gharib Hey, we liveblogged the first one at Emptywheel!
25mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @Pachacutec_ Probably dreaming of Eli Manning completing 70% of his passes for the season. Ha ha ha ha ha ha ha!
26mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @Ali_Gharib: If we cut aid to Israel, we could get higher-priced strippers for our sting operations.
28mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @Ali_Gharib Fantastic flick!
29mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @normative Shocker. Or, you know, not. Criminal defense attorneys been saying this as long as I have been a lawyer.
53mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @erinscafe Math is hard.
2hreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV Every New York restaurant for the next ten years will be running a daily special of shark fin soup. #Sharknado2TheSecondOne
2hreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV Finn does a Slim Pickens! #Sharknado2TheSecondOne
2hreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV Peasants with pitchforks in the streets of New York! Love it! #Sharknado2TheSecondOne
2hreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV RT @ThunderLevin: He found a chainsaw! All is well! #Sharknado2TheSecondOne
3hreplyretweetfavorite