“Engaged in Combat”

Last night, Rand Paul said this:

Well, words do make a difference, and I would feel a little more comfortable if we would get in writing a letter that says he doesn’t believe killing people not actively engaged in combat with drones in America, on American soil, is constitutional.

Today, Eric Holder wrote Paul this letter.

It has come to my attention that you have now asked an additional question. “Does the President have the authority to use a weaponized drone to kill an American not engaged in combat on American soil?” The answer to that question is no.

Aside from noting that Holder took out the “actively” modifier in Paul’s statement (though Paul said some version of this so many times last night that Holder’s formulation might be justified by one of those other ones), I’d have to say that Paul has only managed to move the pea under a different shell in this shell game.

Because now we need a definition of what “engaged in combat” means.

 

Tweet about this on Twitter14Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook11Google+2Email to someone

27 Responses to “Engaged in Combat”

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27

Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel @OKnox Look. I learned today I'm younger than Keanu Reeves. I'm not THAT old.
8mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @onekade Also bc they've moved that to EO 12333 so it doesn't have any control.
9mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel I'm so old remember when we decided it only fed terrorists to make their beheading videos readily accessible. Apparently CNN is not that old
10mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV RT @joshuafoust: Famous principled conservative Trent Lott just got hired by Gazprombank to lobby against Russian sanctions #classy http://…
15mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @onekade CLICK OUR LINK TO SEE DEATH AND KILLING but the terrorists are the only problem. @shawncarrie @CNN
16mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @mlcalderone: Politico CEO-turned-WaPo CEO Fred Ryan stresses winning the morning in meeting with staff: https://t.co/b2gbJLtVwv
22mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @charlie_savage Isn't McRaven's shuffling of OBL photos to CIA to get them classified akin to that? @Krhawkins5
28mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @youbsanctioned So even more cynical than it appears on first glance?
34mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @charlie_savage Which means Hellerstein's SOL?
35mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @youbsanctioned Interesting. Thanks.
41mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @youbsanctioned So why do they ask Treasury and not State for permission?
50mreplyretweetfavorite