“Engaged in Combat”

Last night, Rand Paul said this:

Well, words do make a difference, and I would feel a little more comfortable if we would get in writing a letter that says he doesn’t believe killing people not actively engaged in combat with drones in America, on American soil, is constitutional.

Today, Eric Holder wrote Paul this letter.

It has come to my attention that you have now asked an additional question. “Does the President have the authority to use a weaponized drone to kill an American not engaged in combat on American soil?” The answer to that question is no.

Aside from noting that Holder took out the “actively” modifier in Paul’s statement (though Paul said some version of this so many times last night that Holder’s formulation might be justified by one of those other ones), I’d have to say that Paul has only managed to move the pea under a different shell in this shell game.

Because now we need a definition of what “engaged in combat” means.

 

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+1Email to someone

27 Responses to “Engaged in Combat”

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
Emptywheel Twitterverse
JimWhiteGNV RT @GatorZoneBB: JJ Schwarz Named SEC Freshman of the Week for the First Time #ItsGreatUF http://t.co/5GhnJQVOHP
54mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV RT @pierre: Benjamin Netanyahu's Long History of Crying Wolf About Iran's Nuclear Weapons - The Intercept http://t.co/W61zX2Cl8m
2hreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV RT @carolrosenberg: Urgent: #USSCole judge dismisses official, staff overseeing war court from his case, slows proceedings. http://t.co/I2e
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @gabrielmalor @Popehat Aw jeez, you mean it can get worse than all the disingenuous howling by both sides for the last three months? Ugh.
3hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @yvonnewingett That is great work on that piece.
3hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz As the River Runs Dry: The Southwest's water crisis http://t.co/IhX4vcQAQf via @azcentral This is a fantastic long form article.
3hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @AliWatkins Problem is they're out of context, which is leading to more disinformation. Sigh.
3hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @AliWatkins There are some new things. There are some things that are newly redacted. Outlines already known, but still a distraction.
3hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @just_security Memo has LONG been available (redacted). You'd all have lot more credibility if someone who knew that doing this analysis.
4hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @ThusBloggedA Hey, he admits he blabs abt stuff he hasn't read about. Why read those who have been writing abt this stuff?
4hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Once again @DavidColeGtown reveals he hasn't done his homework. http://t.co/JYv8mFyCFA All known before. Many analyzed.
4hreplyretweetfavorite