“Engaged in Combat”

Last night, Rand Paul said this:

Well, words do make a difference, and I would feel a little more comfortable if we would get in writing a letter that says he doesn’t believe killing people not actively engaged in combat with drones in America, on American soil, is constitutional.

Today, Eric Holder wrote Paul this letter.

It has come to my attention that you have now asked an additional question. “Does the President have the authority to use a weaponized drone to kill an American not engaged in combat on American soil?” The answer to that question is no.

Aside from noting that Holder took out the “actively” modifier in Paul’s statement (though Paul said some version of this so many times last night that Holder’s formulation might be justified by one of those other ones), I’d have to say that Paul has only managed to move the pea under a different shell in this shell game.

Because now we need a definition of what “engaged in combat” means.

 

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+1Email to someone

27 Responses to “Engaged in Combat”

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
  • 18
  • 19
  • 20
  • 21
  • 22
  • 23
  • 24
  • 25
  • 26
  • 27
Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz RT @marcorandazza: Nevada #SB444 makes it easier for public figures to survive Anti-SLAPP motions, even in cases that are doomed. Who hate…
21mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @DerekGossler @william_pitts Plenty of my money goes to ASU already. And news plan looks like garbage dreamed up after renovation funds cut.
35mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @rickhasen: #ELB: “Judge Blasts Prosecutors in Foreign Bribe Case”: The Recorder: With harsh words for… http://t.co/0ei0ddjx9v
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @JasonLeopold: New Docs in Zero Dark Thirty Affair Raise Questions of WH-Sanctioned Intelligence Leak & Inspector General Coverup http:/…
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @astepanovich @ncardozo I have never been prouder of @jilliancyork
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @ggreenwald: If you're (justifiably) enraged about the espionage charges Iran levied against Jason Razaian, Google "Sami al-Hajj" & "Bil…
3hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @DerekGossler @william_pitts That's it?? That looks like shit compared to the original rebuild renderings.
3hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @yeselson @imillhiser Perfect nominee?? Lynch is a terrible nominee+is a regression from Holder on pretty much every material liberal issue
3hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @OKnox Need more pictures of Socks on acid.
3hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @Pedinska As you know, I am not exactly Assange's biggest fan. But he is seriously spot on here.
3hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @APribetic @techdirt I am a one trick pony. You should know this by now!
3hreplyretweetfavorite