Ron Wyden Calls Bullshit on Mike Rogers’ Claims

Mike Rogers, in an effort to defend his efforts to approve and hide dragnet collection on all Americans for years, claimed today that the dragnet prevented a terrorist attack.

“Within the last few years, this program was used to stop a terrorist attack in the United States. We know that. It’s important. It fills in a little seam that we have,” Rogers told reporters Thursday. ”And it’s used to make sure that there is not an international nexus to any terrorism event if there may be one ongoing. So in that regard, it is a very valuable thing,” Rogers said.

When pressed later for more details, Rogers said the committee is “working on trying to get this declassified in a way that we can provide more information. We’re not there yet. But it was a significant case that happened within the last few years.”

Get this: Rogers’ defense argues it makes sense to conduct dragnet surveillance of 310 million Americans for 7 years (plus the 5 years Bush did so illegally), all to thwart one terrorist plot.

One. Plot.

21 million person-years of call data collected since 2006.

One plot.

In his statement, Ron Wyden is a lot more skeptical that this program is so valuable.

The American people have a right to know whether their government thinks that the sweeping, dragnet surveillance that has been alleged in this story is allowed under the law and whether it is actually being conducted. Furthermore, they have a right to know whether the program that has been described is actually of value in preventing attacks. Based on several years of oversight, I believe that its value and effectiveness remain unclear.

Hey, I’d say that one plot over 7 years — especially when you consider how many banksters have done trillions of damage while FBI and NSA have been fiddling with the call records of innocent people — is the definition of a waste of time and resources.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+2Email to someone

13 Responses to Ron Wyden Calls Bullshit on Mike Rogers’ Claims

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel @DevlinBarrett Does that mean they're just going to bury his concerns later, under the weight of others on the board?
7mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @DevlinBarrett: JusticeDept Backs Down in Fight With Judge Over Science Evidence - WSJ http://t.co/XNuMHj0aSy
7mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @jesseberney How was it? I suspect that's what I'm going to be told is only thing short of multiple spot surgery soon @Atrios @LisaMcIntire
24mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @nicholsong Usually means either that they are difficult to get along with or don't pay.
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @davidcnswanson space between words are just same. one space each side. @ncweaver
1hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @nicholsong Says they are probably not a good client!
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @RachelPerrone Right. She learned 10 years too late to make difference, b4 working way thru local school @ClinicEscort
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @RachelPerrone I remember when I explained "need blind" to friend from grad school. She had no idea some schools would pay @ClinicEscort
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @ncweaver CIA is not our evil. They are their own evil. They oustripped being our evil under Dulles and have only gotten further away.
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @ncweaver SHUSH. Stop giving the CIA all my tricks. @davidcnswanson
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @csoghoian Perhaps not but FISC has approved order for 1A actions that enable others to break the law. @matthew_d_green
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @ncweaver My guess is switching to cable system using proportional type would lose plausible deniability for losing cables @davidcnswanson
1hreplyretweetfavorite
June 2013
S M T W T F S
« May   Jul »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30