Telecoms Versus the Toobz: The Source of the Legal Troubles

In this important piece on overbroad surveillance programs under Presidents Bush and Obama, the WaPo reveals that the program James Comey almost resigned over in 2004 involved sucking Internet metadata off telecom switches owned by the telecoms.

Telephone metadata was not the issue that sparked a rebellion at the Justice Department, first by Jack Goldsmith of the Office of Legal Counsel and then by Comey, who was acting attorney general because John D. Ashcroft was in intensive care with acute gallstone pancreatitis. It was Internet metadata.

At Bush’s direction, in orders prepared by David Addington, the counsel to Vice President Richard B. Cheney, the NSA had been siphoning e-mail metadata and technical records of Skype calls from data links owned by AT&T, Sprint and MCI, which later merged with Verizon.

For reasons unspecified in the report, Goldsmith and Comey became convinced that Bush had no lawful authority to do that.

This leads me to wonder whether legal leverage from the Internet providers — rather than any squeamishness about the law itself — caused the conflict.

Remember, in the fight over retroactive immunity in 2008, the industry group for the Internet providers — including Microsoft, Yahoo, and Google — argued against retroactive immunity.

The Computer & Communications Industry Association (CCIA) strongly opposes S. 2248, the “FISA Amendments Act of 2007,” as passed by the Senate on February 12, 2008. CCIA believes that this bill should not provide retroactive immunity to corporations that may have participated in violations of federal law. CCIA represents an industry that is called upon for cooperation and assistance in law enforcement. To act with speed in times of crisis, our industry needs clear rules, not vague promises that the U.S. Government can be relied upon to paper over Constitutional transgressions after the fact.

Given the WaPo’s report, this amounts to a demand that Congress allow the Internet companies to hold the telecoms accountable for helping the government seize their data.

As well they should have been able to. To a degree, these companies compete, and in the name of helping the government, the telecoms were helping themselves to Internet suppliers crown jewels.

Microsoft and Google versus AT&T and Verizon. Now that would have been an amusing lawsuit to watch. And probably a lot bigger worry for the people who use all of them to spy on us peons than we peons actually are.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

6 Responses to Telecoms Versus the Toobz: The Source of the Legal Troubles

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
Emptywheel Twitterverse
JimWhiteGNV @cherylrofer That's my assumption.
32mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @tse2935 How old's grandson?
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @steveglista Maybe just recommend he seek work with PwC? Seems like it'd be a perfect fit. @ageis
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Don't want it to happen, but am curious whether Ducey is gonna get the same kind of treatment DeBlasio go. @bmaz
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @RobertMLee: Why Cybersecurity Dollars Do Not Add Up At the Pentagon http://t.co/1hhB1L8dyJ
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @tse2935 I think daytimes are for mom's w/their kids, particularly as it gets warm enough to sic them on that kid's garden.
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @thegrugq No Bitcoin for you? Cmon, everybody's doing it.
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @steveglista I repeat against my questions abt why the investigation into the investigation is in a totally different district. @bmaz
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @steveglista Dratel's certainly gonna raise a stink. http://t.co/XbuB87e2W3 @bmaz
2hreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV @Pedinska Heh. Not really. My strategy is usually "get tough or die".
2hreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV @Pedinska Thanks. I was very happy with the wonderful condition they are in. Not marked, but I'm hoping they're "Early Bird" variety.
2hreplyretweetfavorite
June 2013
S M T W T F S
« May   Jul »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30