Telecoms Versus the Toobz: The Source of the Legal Troubles

In this important piece on overbroad surveillance programs under Presidents Bush and Obama, the WaPo reveals that the program James Comey almost resigned over in 2004 involved sucking Internet metadata off telecom switches owned by the telecoms.

Telephone metadata was not the issue that sparked a rebellion at the Justice Department, first by Jack Goldsmith of the Office of Legal Counsel and then by Comey, who was acting attorney general because John D. Ashcroft was in intensive care with acute gallstone pancreatitis. It was Internet metadata.

At Bush’s direction, in orders prepared by David Addington, the counsel to Vice President Richard B. Cheney, the NSA had been siphoning e-mail metadata and technical records of Skype calls from data links owned by AT&T, Sprint and MCI, which later merged with Verizon.

For reasons unspecified in the report, Goldsmith and Comey became convinced that Bush had no lawful authority to do that.

This leads me to wonder whether legal leverage from the Internet providers — rather than any squeamishness about the law itself — caused the conflict.

Remember, in the fight over retroactive immunity in 2008, the industry group for the Internet providers — including Microsoft, Yahoo, and Google — argued against retroactive immunity.

The Computer & Communications Industry Association (CCIA) strongly opposes S. 2248, the “FISA Amendments Act of 2007,” as passed by the Senate on February 12, 2008. CCIA believes that this bill should not provide retroactive immunity to corporations that may have participated in violations of federal law. CCIA represents an industry that is called upon for cooperation and assistance in law enforcement. To act with speed in times of crisis, our industry needs clear rules, not vague promises that the U.S. Government can be relied upon to paper over Constitutional transgressions after the fact.

Given the WaPo’s report, this amounts to a demand that Congress allow the Internet companies to hold the telecoms accountable for helping the government seize their data.

As well they should have been able to. To a degree, these companies compete, and in the name of helping the government, the telecoms were helping themselves to Internet suppliers crown jewels.

Microsoft and Google versus AT&T and Verizon. Now that would have been an amusing lawsuit to watch. And probably a lot bigger worry for the people who use all of them to spy on us peons than we peons actually are.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

6 Responses to Telecoms Versus the Toobz: The Source of the Legal Troubles

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
Emptywheel Twitterverse
JimWhiteGNV Boy are those folks going to be surprised when they retire and learn that orange money isn't legal tender.
11mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @onekade Was worried Bill the Dog the Cat was feasting on them instead of mouses.
20mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @onekade That's really sweet but what happened to all the pizzas gf sent you?
23mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Vlad Putin right now: "Yeah sure they got my spies but can you believe NYers are stocking KALE to get thru blizzard? " (Knocks back vodka)
25mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz The weather here is overcast+disappointing as a host. Still, its 69º, where are Pats fans like @caidid + @robertcaruso ? Wish you were here!
43mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @AllThingsHLS Also. If Richard Sherman deflates Brady's balls, is it a violation?
49mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @AllThingsHLS Whu?!?! That's as bad as Bass buying Staropramen leading ultimately to Coors owning it.
49mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @AllThingsHLS You seem worried. You haven't bet any of Seattle's GOOD beer yet. I'd even be willing to bet MICHIGAN IPA, in honor of U Mich.
53mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @AllThingsHLS Nah. Ted Wells already said he won't be done by Sunday. You gotta face Brady, hot dog martini and all.
56mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @PogoWasRight The dog is currently on on the shit list. Not necessarily unusual understand you.... #ItinerantThings
59mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @robertcaruso: as @bmaz and I have repeatedly warned: the mark of an amateur is worrying about NSA. Worry about DEA. http://t.co/grjPERz
1hreplyretweetfavorite
June 2013
S M T W T F S
« May   Jul »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30