FISA Amendments Act Minimization: Preventing Serious Harm to Corporate Persons

As I was working through some other things last night, I had an opportunity to compare the minimization standards for the FISA Amendments Act (see section h) with the standards under which the actual minimization procedures allow the retention of purely domestic communications (that is, between parties that are all within the United States). These procedures are in addition to procedures that affect foreign communications (with one of the participants a non-US person outside the US).

Last night, I suggested there were 3 “normal” standards and one that doesn’t appear in the law pertaining to cybersecurity and encrypted communications. But that’s not entirely right. The last standard in the actual law reads,

(4) notwithstanding paragraphs (1), (2), and (3), with respect to any electronic surveillance approved pursuant to section 1802 (a) of this title, procedures that require that no contents of any communication to which a United States person is a party shall be disclosed, disseminated, or used for any purpose or retained for longer than 72 hours unless a court order under section 1805 of this title is obtained or unless the Attorney General determines that the information indicates a threat of death or serious bodily harm to any person.

That is, the actual law allows retention of information for up to 72 hours (presumably to process, which is moot anyway, since they’re actually keeping this data 5 years), unless the court or the Attorney General says it must be kept longer because it pertains to threat of death of serious bodily harm.

But in the minimization standards themselves, here’s how that reads.

A communication identified as a domestic communication will be promptly destroyed upon recognition unless the Director (or Acting Director) of NSA specifically determines, in writing, that:

the communication contains information pertaining to a threat of serious harm to life or property. [my emphasis]

In plain language, the law seems to be about saving human lives. But in paragraphs marked Secret, the government has redefined threat of death or “serious bodily harm to any person” as “serious harm to life or property.”

And while it’s just a guess here, I’m guessing that they switched this language, protecting property, not people, to protect corporate people.

In any case, spying on entirely domestic communications to protect against threats entirely to property, not life, sure seems like a giant loophole in a program that is supposed to be focused exclusively on foreign intelligence.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+2Email to someone

8 Responses to FISA Amendments Act Minimization: Preventing Serious Harm to Corporate Persons

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel @Krhawkins5 Most transparent torturers Evah™
11mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @Krhawkins5: UN committee against torture recommendations to US. #15 all about abuse of secrecy http://t.co/DMHzDsFXwI
12mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Such claims only help Vlad Putin RT @EliLake: Let’s be real. Star Wars doesn’t really hold up nearly 40 years later.
17mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @kdrum And you STILL refuse to tell me where to get a big screen teevee.
35mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @SarahKnuckey: UN Committee against Torture: "deep concern at frequent police shootings of unarmed black individuals" #Ferguson http://t…
37mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @SarahKnuckey: UN Committee against Torture: US should review Appendix M of the Army Field Manual & "abolish" some of its provisions htt…
39mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @SarahKnuckey: UN Committee against Torture "calls for the declassification and prompt public release" of the torture report http://t.co
42mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @jdakwar: BREAKING: UN Committee Against Torture releases scathing report on U.S. compliance with anti-Torture treaty. http://t.co/A01YV
43mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV Seven Month Extension of P5+1 Negotiations? We’d Be Lucky With Seven Weeks https://t.co/KMg5zmn8Ai
58mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @SarahKnuckey: UN Committee against Torture: there is "an ongoing failure" in the US to "fully investigate allegations of torture" http:…
1hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Oops: After Threatening Hacker With 440 Years, Prosecutors Settle for a Misdemeanor | WIRED http://t.co/BjOkNbK7p5
8hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @PatrickCToomey @csoghoian @WSJ @dannyyadron Jeebus, the All Writs Act?? Owsley is right though, notable that magistrate issued opinion.
9hreplyretweetfavorite
June 2013
S M T W T F S
« May   Jul »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30