FISA Amendments Act Minimization: Preventing Serious Harm to Corporate Persons

As I was working through some other things last night, I had an opportunity to compare the minimization standards for the FISA Amendments Act (see section h) with the standards under which the actual minimization procedures allow the retention of purely domestic communications (that is, between parties that are all within the United States). These procedures are in addition to procedures that affect foreign communications (with one of the participants a non-US person outside the US).

Last night, I suggested there were 3 “normal” standards and one that doesn’t appear in the law pertaining to cybersecurity and encrypted communications. But that’s not entirely right. The last standard in the actual law reads,

(4) notwithstanding paragraphs (1), (2), and (3), with respect to any electronic surveillance approved pursuant to section 1802 (a) of this title, procedures that require that no contents of any communication to which a United States person is a party shall be disclosed, disseminated, or used for any purpose or retained for longer than 72 hours unless a court order under section 1805 of this title is obtained or unless the Attorney General determines that the information indicates a threat of death or serious bodily harm to any person.

That is, the actual law allows retention of information for up to 72 hours (presumably to process, which is moot anyway, since they’re actually keeping this data 5 years), unless the court or the Attorney General says it must be kept longer because it pertains to threat of death of serious bodily harm.

But in the minimization standards themselves, here’s how that reads.

A communication identified as a domestic communication will be promptly destroyed upon recognition unless the Director (or Acting Director) of NSA specifically determines, in writing, that:

the communication contains information pertaining to a threat of serious harm to life or property. [my emphasis]

In plain language, the law seems to be about saving human lives. But in paragraphs marked Secret, the government has redefined threat of death or “serious bodily harm to any person” as “serious harm to life or property.”

And while it’s just a guess here, I’m guessing that they switched this language, protecting property, not people, to protect corporate people.

In any case, spying on entirely domestic communications to protect against threats entirely to property, not life, sure seems like a giant loophole in a program that is supposed to be focused exclusively on foreign intelligence.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+2Email to someone

8 Responses to FISA Amendments Act Minimization: Preventing Serious Harm to Corporate Persons

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz @CathyGellis Yeah, I took a gander and it is really pretty stunning. I mean we have a nutbag here in Maricopa County, but nothing like that.
1mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV RT @20newsguy: WHASSUPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPPP http://t.co/sxFo09XZ9c
1mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Just got out of my Delorean to discover everyone talking about Star Wars and the anti-Clinton Noise Machine's one setting off full burn.
5mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @_JGR There are some deep pathological problems in MO. Jeebus.
7mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Yep, the diamond thief was "The Phantom" aka Sir Charles Litton https://t.co/4vefHFxmF3
8mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @_JGR @espinsegall No no, we may have to join forces in St. Louis soon!
12mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @espinsegall And by bogus I mean putrid tax based rationale as opposed to just voting for the mandate. It was horrid "win" tho it was a win
21mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @espinsegall You are arguing that AMK voted how he did because of Volokh? Bollocks. Only vote maybe changed was cowing JGR into bogus ruling
22mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @TeresaKopec Right. Gen X culture may generally suck ass, but goddamnit, Star Wars is ours.
27mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV There are no more almond bear claws in the house. While I am basking in the glow of the one just finished, I already sense coming panic.
29mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @TeresaKopec See, there's GOT to be a different word for 20 yo's excitement for Star Wars. What did they call it when we discovered the 60s?
30mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV @emptywheel Speaking of screen captures...
34mreplyretweetfavorite
June 2013
S M T W T F S
« May   Jul »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30