FISA Amendments Act Minimization: Preventing Serious Harm to Corporate Persons

As I was working through some other things last night, I had an opportunity to compare the minimization standards for the FISA Amendments Act (see section h) with the standards under which the actual minimization procedures allow the retention of purely domestic communications (that is, between parties that are all within the United States). These procedures are in addition to procedures that affect foreign communications (with one of the participants a non-US person outside the US).

Last night, I suggested there were 3 “normal” standards and one that doesn’t appear in the law pertaining to cybersecurity and encrypted communications. But that’s not entirely right. The last standard in the actual law reads,

(4) notwithstanding paragraphs (1), (2), and (3), with respect to any electronic surveillance approved pursuant to section 1802 (a) of this title, procedures that require that no contents of any communication to which a United States person is a party shall be disclosed, disseminated, or used for any purpose or retained for longer than 72 hours unless a court order under section 1805 of this title is obtained or unless the Attorney General determines that the information indicates a threat of death or serious bodily harm to any person.

That is, the actual law allows retention of information for up to 72 hours (presumably to process, which is moot anyway, since they’re actually keeping this data 5 years), unless the court or the Attorney General says it must be kept longer because it pertains to threat of death of serious bodily harm.

But in the minimization standards themselves, here’s how that reads.

A communication identified as a domestic communication will be promptly destroyed upon recognition unless the Director (or Acting Director) of NSA specifically determines, in writing, that:

the communication contains information pertaining to a threat of serious harm to life or property. [my emphasis]

In plain language, the law seems to be about saving human lives. But in paragraphs marked Secret, the government has redefined threat of death or “serious bodily harm to any person” as “serious harm to life or property.”

And while it’s just a guess here, I’m guessing that they switched this language, protecting property, not people, to protect corporate people.

In any case, spying on entirely domestic communications to protect against threats entirely to property, not life, sure seems like a giant loophole in a program that is supposed to be focused exclusively on foreign intelligence.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+1Email to someone

8 Responses to FISA Amendments Act Minimization: Preventing Serious Harm to Corporate Persons

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz @JasonLeopold You must be suffering from Steamrock Fever. Better Chill!
1hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @JasonLeopold Granted, it is a trick question.
1hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @JasonLeopold I am just glad you are still alive to answer! Now, better Scorps....orig w/MS (Lonesome Crow etc) or w/o Schenker?
1hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @JasonLeopold Joe Lynn turner or Graham Bonnet.......pick one.
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz So, @MSNBC @CNN and @CBS are all such willfully pathetic jackasses with their programming. Couldn't buy a clue w/ a $100,000,000,000.00 bill
2hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @shenebraskan It is NOT that he is a "foreigner". So was Ferguson. And I really liked him from the start. This guy doesn't cut it @CBS
3hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @shenebraskan Craig was a bit to get used to, but he was funny+warm. I HATE this now on @CBS @CBSLateLateShow Total crap. #FuckBecksUndies
3hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @jilliancyork Shockingly, at the 7:1 ratio she is close to passing her geezer parents. Frankly it is all SHOCKING https://t.co/v3lWRiSvQW
3hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @jilliancyork Very well, Kiki is always available by DM. Girl just had her 9th birthday you know. Getting up there, but still happening!
3hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @jilliancyork Also Refresh Yourself!
3hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @jilliancyork We are up, and REALLY miss Ms. Yikes!
3hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Seriously, this would be like BBC though it a brilliant idea to have Rob Schneider host a major show across the pond #Idiocy #JustSayNo @CBS
3hreplyretweetfavorite
June 2013
S M T W T F S
« May   Jul »
 1
2345678
9101112131415
16171819202122
23242526272829
30