James Clapper’s Double Super Secret Correction

Screen shot 2013-07-01 at 9.21.55 AMIf the Director of National Intelligence corrects a lie but nobody hears it, does it make a sound?

Greg Miller returns focus to James Clapper and Keith Alexander and President Obama’s lies that underscore why, at least for some of his leaks, Edward Snowden must count as a whistleblower. He reveals two new details about why Clapper is not headed for prison.

First, Clapper claims his staffers acknowledged to Wyden (presumably not in writing) his error after the Senator demanded a correction.

Sen. Ron Wyden (D-Ore.), who had asked Clapper the question about information collection on Americans, said in a recent statement that the director had failed to clarify the remark promptly despite being asked to do so. Clapper disputed that in his note to the committee, saying his “staff acknowledged the error to Senator Wyden’s staff soon after the hearing.”

And then, more than two weeks after Snowden proved Clapper to be a liar (and 10 days after Wyden called for hearings for the Intelligence Committee to correct their disinformation), Clapper sent the Senate Intelligence Committee a letter apologizing for his “clearly erroneous” comment.

Acknowledging the “heated controversy” over his remark, Clapper sent a letter to the Senate Intelligence Committee on June 21 saying that he had misunderstood the question he had been asked.

“I have thought long and hard to re-create what went through my mind at the time,” Clapper said in the previously undisclosed letter. “My response was clearly erroneous — for which I apologize.” [my emphasis]

Miller also reveals that Clapper presented yet another explanation for why his lie wasn’t really a lie.

He made a new attempt to explain the exchange in his June 21 correspondence, which included a hand-written note to Wyden saying that an attached letter was addressed to the committee chairman but that he “wanted [Wyden] to see this first.”

Clapper said he thought Wyden was referring to NSA surveillance of e-mail traffic involving overseas targets, not the separate program in which the agency is authorized to collect records of Americans’ phone calls that include the numbers and duration of calls but not individuals’ names or the contents of their calls.

Referring to his appearances before Congress over several decades, Clapper concluded by saying that “mistakes will happen, and when I make one, I correct it.”

Note, this particular lie retreats to Administration claims that they no longer collect Internet metadata, at least no via Section 702 collection, at least as far as they’lll tell us.

Of course, that’s only been true (if it is in fact true) since 2011, for what that’s worth.

One thing Miller is missing in this otherwise laudable article is one more detail from Wyden: that he gave Clapper notice he was going to ask the question.

Clapper got the question for the test before taking it, and he still — he says — misunderstood it.

But of course that’s not what happened. The way Clapper has made false statements in public and then “acknowledged errors” in secret is all part of the game by which Clapper mostly sort of tells the truth to Congress, but continues to lie to the American people.

In other news, it has now been almost a week since, caught in another lie, the NSA took down their “Section 702 Protections” document, without replacing them with an accurate description of what  protections, if any, Americans have under Section 702.

Perhaps NSA has finally decided to start telling the truth?

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+5Email to someone

11 Responses to James Clapper’s Double Super Secret Correction

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel @ncweaver I was off-grid, but weren't some people at least feigning surprise when Tsipras announced the referendum?
2mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV It sounds like John Galt is trying to kill Tennessee.
6mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @ncweaver And how much would NSA/GCHQ share w/Euro countries, given past evidence of some aggression v Eurozone?
8mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV Wait. We've had so many shootings that now we are actually repeating shooting sites? Sad. Hoping for safety at #NavyYard.
14mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel .@digby56 asks who was benefitting from UK's spying on Amnesty. http://t.co/t3IK7WyZwr
42mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @ncweaver Yes. And NSA was using auto searches until they got busted for it in 2009 (they were illegally treating the data as 12333 data)
45mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @ncweaver Auto searches got approved in 2012, but NSA never pulled it off "technically," gave up when O decided to outsource to telecoms
47mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @ncweaver One thing I'm trying to figure out is how much the automated queries of phone dragnet data that never got implemented was this.
48mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @ncweaver They're otherwise focused at the moment. But they're capable of circling back.
49mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @ncweaver Oh. Right. Well, third least surprising thing then?
51mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @Atrios Don't playground thugs routinely give conflicting orders to the smallest kid on the playground?
57mreplyretweetfavorite
July 2013
S M T W T F S
« Jun   Aug »
 123456
78910111213
14151617181920
21222324252627
28293031