DNI’s Latest “I Con” Speak: “Sift Through and Have Unfettered Access To”

The Director of National Intelligence, after having repeatedly refused to answer any questions about the WSJ’s big scoop in yesterday’s conference call, has released a new document pretending to debunk stories based on the WSJ (though not the WSJ itself). It reads, in part,

Press reports based on an article published in today’s Wall Street Journal mischaracterize aspects of NSA’s activities conducted under Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act. The NSA does not sift through and have unfettered access to 75% of the United States’ online communications.

The following are the facts:

  • Media reports based upon the recent Wall Street Journal (WSJ) article regarding NSA’s foreign intelligence activities provide an inaccurate and misleading picture of NSA’s collection programs, but especially with respect to NSA’s use of Section 702 of the Foreign Intelligence Surveillance Act (FISA).
  • The reports leave readers with the impression that NSA is sifting through as much as 75% of the United States’ online communications, which is simply not true.
  • In its foreign intelligence mission, and using all its authorities, NSA “touches” about 1.6%, and analysts only look at 0.00004%, of the world’s internet traffic.

Obviously, the government partly obscures its answer by presenting the global numbers when trying to debunk US numbers.

But more importantly, it builds a gigantic straw man with its “sift through and have unfettered access to” language. That’s not what the WSJ said (which is why DNI shifts its accusation).

The system has the capacity to reach roughly 75% of all U.S. Internet traffic in the hunt for foreign intelligence, including a wide array of communications by foreigners and Americans. In some cases, it retains the written content of emails sent between citizens within the U.S. and also filters domestic phone calls made with Internet technology, these people say.

[snip]

The surveillance system is built on relationships with telecommunications carriers that together cover about 75% of U.S. Internet communications.

The NSA doesn’t do all the sifting. The telecoms Americans are paying every month do the first sift (which means part of that 75% of US Internet traffic is inaccessible to the NSA).

But see what DNI doesn’t ever do? Refute the WSJ.

Which I assume means we can take as confirmation that the government and its pseudo-private partners the telecoms do, in fact, sift through 75% of US Internet traffic.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

4 Responses to DNI’s Latest “I Con” Speak: “Sift Through and Have Unfettered Access To”

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz @MikeW_CA I am so old that I remember when there were code words used to describe her. And all knew she was a fuck up even then.
9mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @jaazee1 Ah, OK. Thanks. @OKnox
40mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV Save us Dennis Rodman!
47mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Also, one should ASSUME all pseudnyms are fake since so many people who were previously public (Mitchell, Jessen, Fredman, McPherson) hidden
1hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz So, aiders, abetters, suborners of perjury like Clapper willfully and wantonly roam free while @JamesRisen is still under the gun? Bullshit!
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @joshgerstein Brennan's role at head of TTIC. Also not covert.
1hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Honestly, if we are still playing craven mind games over Alfreda Frances Bikowsky's name, then America is dumber than advertised.
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @joshgerstein Also gonna write some abt Jonathan Fredman, also not covert.
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @joshgerstein Except that her ID has been released years ago, and she's not covert. Hell, CIA's not even defacing her Wiki.
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Wondering if Kim Jong IL and Un weren't easily turned into Hollywood caricatures of Asians movies would keep going after them?
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Bikowsky prolly single biggest reason for way CIA demanded SSCI redact names. To prevent lawsuit, knowing ALL she's done, & of her promotion
2hreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV Does Newt Gingrich remember where he was when he first learned we had lost our first cyberwar?
2hreplyretweetfavorite