More Contractor Problems — And FISC Disclosure Problems?

In the updated minimization procedures approved in 2011, the NSA added language making clear that the procedures applied to everyone doing analysis for NSA.

For the purposes of these procedures, the terms “National Security Agency” and “NSA personnel” refer to any employees of the National Security Agency/Central Security Service (“NSA/CSS” or “NSA”) and any other personnel engaged in Signals Intelligence (SIGINT) operations authorized pursuant to section 702 of the Act if such operations are executed under the direction, authority, or control of the Director, NSA/Chief, CSS (DIRNSA).

It told the FISA Court it needed this language to make it clear that militarily-deployed NSA personnel also had to abide by them.

The government has added language to Section 1 to make explicit that the procedures apply not only to NSA employees, but also to any other persons engaged in Section 702-related activities that are conducted under the direction, authority or control of the Director of the NSA. NSA Minimization Procedures at 1. According to the government, this new language is intended to clarify that Central Security Service personnel conducting signals intelligence operations authorized by Section 702 are bound by the procedures, even when they are deployed with a military unit and subject to the military chain of command.

But to me both these passages rang alarms about contractors. Did they have to include this language, I wondered, because contractors in the past had claimed not to be bound by the same rules NSA’s direct employees were?

Lo and behold the Bloomberg piece reporting that NSA’s IG undercounts deliberate violations by roughly 299 a year includes this:

The actions, said a second U.S. official briefed on them, were the work of overzealous NSA employees or contractors eager to prevent any encore to the Sept. 11, 2001, terrorist attacks.

It sure seems that at least some of the worst violations — the ones even NSA’s IG will call intentional — were committed by contractors. Which suggests I may be right about the inclusion of that language to make it clear it applies to contractors.

If that’s the case, then why did NSA tell the FISA Court this new language was about militarily-deployed NSA employees, and not about contractors?

 

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

One Response to More Contractor Problems — And FISC Disclosure Problems?

  • 1
Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz @onekade No, I am not a cop. But I deal with them a lot and find this completely believable. Almost predictable.
3mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @TyreJim @emptywheel @onekade It is not my choice, but a lot of records interactions are still done that way. PPD finally getting better.
5mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @onekade I deal with cops all the time via fax; I see nothing whatsoever implausible about it.
8mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV @ChuckPfarrer Blix was right and invading Iraq over false WMD allegations was a war crime. @ClintSharpe @SpyTalker @WideAsleepNima
13mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @B_D_Silver Which is why my Modest Proposition is so smart. Potholes will never get filled unless Snyder buddy profits. @attackerman
15mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @B_D_Silver I keep making a Modest Proposition that Snyder turn potholes into for-profit charter schools and fill w/children @attackerman
18mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @ilovaussiesheps Right. Choose to pay a coach $48M Choose not to pay to fill the potholes. @attackerman
19mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @emptywheel @onekade I have a fax machine
19mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @attackerman Well as I said before I've got mixed feelings abt Harbaugh, especially bc we can't afford to fill our potholes.
26mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @attackerman Better you should take credit for the Kitties playoff berth, since the Gents aren't using theirs this year.
27mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @GormoJourno: @mattdpearce It was passed to me by a cop with decades on the force. It is 100% authentic.
28mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @attackerman Well how come he's on my telly 2,000 miles away? And what was he doing in NYC anyway?
28mreplyretweetfavorite