The No-Technologist Technology Review Panel

In addition to the four people ABC earlier reported would be part of Obama’s Committee to Learn to Trust the Dragnet, Obama added … another law professor, Geoffrey Stone. (Stone is [see update], along with Swire, a worthwhile member. But not a technologist.)

What’s fucking crazy about the committee is it has zero technologists to review a topic that is highly technical. Obama implicitly admits as much! He sells this committee for their “immense experience in national security, intelligence, oversight, privacy and civil liberties.” National security, intelligence, oversight, privacy, civil liberties. No technology.

On August 9, President Obama called for a high-level group of experts to review our intelligence and communications technologies. Today the President met with the members of this group: Richard Clarke, Michael Morell, Geoffrey Stone, Cass Sunstein and Peter Swire.

These individuals bring to the task immense experience in national security, intelligence, oversight, privacy and civil liberties. The Review Group will bring a range of experience and perspectives to bear to advise the President on how, in light of advancements in technology, the United States can employ its technical collection capabilities in a way that optimally protects our national security and advances our foreign policy while respecting our commitment to privacy and civil liberties, recognizing our need to maintain the public trust, and reducing the risk of unauthorized disclosure.

The President thanked the Members of the Group for taking on this important task and looks forward to hearing from them as their work proceeds. Within 60 days of beginning their work, the Review Group will brief their interim findings to the President through the Director of National Intelligence, and the Review Group will provide a final report and recommendations to the President. [my emphasis]

So in spite of the fact that the White House highlights technology in its mandate, that didn’t lead them to find even a single technologist.

Also: Cass Sunstein.

Also: the Committee does, in fact, report its findings through James Clapper, the guy whose programs they will review, they guy who lied to Congress.

At least the White House isn’t promising — as Obama originally did — that it will be an “outside” “independent” committee.

Update: Egads. I take back what I said about Stone, who said this in June.

[W]hat should Edward Snowden have done? Probably, he should have presented his concerns to senior, responsible members of Congress. But the one thing he most certainly should not have done is to decide on the basis of his own ill-informed, arrogant and amateurish judgment that he knows better than everyone else in government how best to serve the national interest. The rule of law matters, and no one gave Edward Snowden the authority to make that decision for the nation. His conduct was more than unacceptable; it was criminal.

Tweet about this on TwitterShare on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

15 Responses to The No-Technologist Technology Review Panel

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel RT @shannynmoore: I have been lucky enough to speak to @GloriaSteinem and @madeleine in my life. Today I feel like feminism burnt down. I'm…
14mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @gideonstrumpet That's what I said from the jump. Cosby should have offered testimony that he had a promise and relied on it to waive 5th.
26mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel One Reason CIA Is Claiming Drone Emails Are Top Secret: ACLU’s FOIA https://t.co/UumOIw2dIF
36mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @HinaShamsi @Krhawkins5 Which is to say, one reason CIA insisting they are TS is to prevent ACLU from getting advantage in FOIA suit.
52mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV Archer certainly knows how to set lofty goals if he thinks he can get Winston to be a good role model. https://t.co/FK8MzohKaU
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @LukeTwinCities About right...
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Waiting for someone to call it the Sharia Bowl on account of the Arabs conquering Rome.
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @LukeTwinCities can we work Kissinger into the name?
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @7ha_r3verend There is a US Attorney led investigation including EPA, FBI, USPS investigators. No subjects have been announced.
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Is there a name for when women who've OKed bombing or starving of other women say if you don't help other women you're going to hell?
1hreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV Parenting skills for the win. https://t.co/Z7NzlFpoK2
1hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @caulkthewagon When she was on the CIA payroll, you mean? @GloriaSteinem
2hreplyretweetfavorite