The No-Technologist Technology Review Panel

In addition to the four people ABC earlier reported would be part of Obama’s Committee to Learn to Trust the Dragnet, Obama added … another law professor, Geoffrey Stone. (Stone is [see update], along with Swire, a worthwhile member. But not a technologist.)

What’s fucking crazy about the committee is it has zero technologists to review a topic that is highly technical. Obama implicitly admits as much! He sells this committee for their “immense experience in national security, intelligence, oversight, privacy and civil liberties.” National security, intelligence, oversight, privacy, civil liberties. No technology.

On August 9, President Obama called for a high-level group of experts to review our intelligence and communications technologies. Today the President met with the members of this group: Richard Clarke, Michael Morell, Geoffrey Stone, Cass Sunstein and Peter Swire.

These individuals bring to the task immense experience in national security, intelligence, oversight, privacy and civil liberties. The Review Group will bring a range of experience and perspectives to bear to advise the President on how, in light of advancements in technology, the United States can employ its technical collection capabilities in a way that optimally protects our national security and advances our foreign policy while respecting our commitment to privacy and civil liberties, recognizing our need to maintain the public trust, and reducing the risk of unauthorized disclosure.

The President thanked the Members of the Group for taking on this important task and looks forward to hearing from them as their work proceeds. Within 60 days of beginning their work, the Review Group will brief their interim findings to the President through the Director of National Intelligence, and the Review Group will provide a final report and recommendations to the President. [my emphasis]

So in spite of the fact that the White House highlights technology in its mandate, that didn’t lead them to find even a single technologist.

Also: Cass Sunstein.

Also: the Committee does, in fact, report its findings through James Clapper, the guy whose programs they will review, they guy who lied to Congress.

At least the White House isn’t promising — as Obama originally did — that it will be an “outside” “independent” committee.

Update: Egads. I take back what I said about Stone, who said this in June.

[W]hat should Edward Snowden have done? Probably, he should have presented his concerns to senior, responsible members of Congress. But the one thing he most certainly should not have done is to decide on the basis of his own ill-informed, arrogant and amateurish judgment that he knows better than everyone else in government how best to serve the national interest. The rule of law matters, and no one gave Edward Snowden the authority to make that decision for the nation. His conduct was more than unacceptable; it was criminal.

Tweet about this on TwitterShare on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

15 Responses to The No-Technologist Technology Review Panel

Emptywheel Twitterverse
bmaz RT @NATICKPOLICE: Unrest spotted at this morning's Little League Parade. #FreeBrady https://t.co/tLjm3ERgw3
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @AthertonKD How are you supposed to learn abt math if all wars are forever really? @pastordan
2hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @pastordan mine is asking mom where those US soldiers were & she said Cambodia but not to worry abt that BC it was far away.
3hreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz RT @VinceWarren: What Do We Know About the #Guantanamo Cancer Cluster? https://t.co/oWxJ4z1uCA via @ShayanaKadidal @theCCR
3hreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @AthertonKD oof. Serves me right for pointing that out.
3hreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV @GatorsBB I'm confused. I thought Horvath is a sophomore.
3hreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV That said, Trump's idiocy will probably take us to Armageddon, so I will wind up voting for Clinton with tears in my eyes for what we are.
3hreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV I see zero prospect of US policy getting out of the shithole where it is mired on Clinton's watch. She will only make it worse.
3hreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV And yes, I still maintain that with regard to policy in the region, Barack Obama has been W's third and fourth terms. Clinton will be fifth.
3hreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV US policy in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Syria, Israel and Saudi Arabia since 9/11 will live in infamy as long series of worst possible moves.
3hreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV Not that the Middle East was peaceful before, but since the US started actively interfering after 9/11, we have destroyed multiple countries
3hreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV Who could have imagined that Iraq could melt down even further? The US could pay massive reparations for generations and still not suffice.
3hreplyretweetfavorite