Drowning in Haystacks

The NYT and Guardian have similar stories out today describing the sheer breadth of NSA’s spying. The Guardian describes how NSA gleefully embraced change because it presented more opportunities for SIGINT collection.

n one of the leaked ‘State of the Enterprise’ documents from 2007, an NSA staff member says: “The constant change in the world provides fertile ground for discovering new targets, technologies and networks that enable production of Sigint.”

The official happily embraces this: “It’s becoming a cliché that a permanent state of change is the new standard. It is the world we live in – navigating through continuous whitewater.”

It’s an environment in which the NSA thrives, the official says. And adds: “Lucky for us.”

And both present the plight of someone analyzing Lashkar-e-Taiba who couldn’t read the intelligence because it was all Farsi and Arabic.

One N.S.A. officer on the Lashkar-e-Taiba beat let slip that some of his eavesdropping turned out to be largely pointless, perhaps because of the agency’s chronic shortage of skilled linguists. He “ran some queries” to read intercepted communications of certain Lashkar-e-Taiba members, he wrote in the wiki, but added: “Most of it is in Arabic or Farsi, so I can’t make much of it.”

Both, too, present how detailed our intelligence from Afghanistan has been — though the NYT noted, it doesn’t seem to have brought us success.

We are collecting enormous amounts of data, but it’s not clear what good it’s doing us.

Meanwhile, remember this. The intelligence community keeps missing Congress’ mandated deadlines to install insider detection software — including in the Hawaii location from which Snowden took his files. Given Snowden’s success, it’s safe to assume paid assets of foreign governments have gotten some of it as well. The reason we’re not protecting all this intelligence is because we don’t have the bandwidth to run the software.

Collecting all this data — particularly if we can’t even analyze much of it — has costs. One cost is in the tradeoff we’ve made in keeping it secure.

Our haystacks our drowning us.

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

17 Responses to Drowning in Haystacks

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
  • 11
  • 12
  • 13
  • 14
  • 15
  • 16
  • 17
Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel @theurbansherpa she definitely used to. But then she got a better Parish.
8mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz This is too laugh. Come on, seriously?? https://t.co/V8G1sq5gCZ
12mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @lawrencelebin Absolutely not my place to judge people's faith.
12mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz .@McCannSportsLaw No, having JD does not mean diddly squat. It is whether you have practiced enough to have a clue about what you are doing
15mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @theurbansherpa You accusing your mom of squirming at Mass? She's not really the squirming type.
17mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz Welp, @ESPN, @MortReport + Lester Munson are not just heinous stenographers of lies, but duplicitous on law too http://t.co/YY6PCX9Ve0
20mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @SportsbySharona Tebow's job might better be described as 2-point conversion captain, not backup QB. @tyschalter
20mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @TheTabbasco Yup. That's why I said he'd partly listen to those bits. @LOLGOP
21mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @theurbansherpa I'd love to see them go to Mass bc they'd prolly squirm a lot. And Huff and Puff.
23mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @WilliamOckhamTx Now that you mention it it does say 2016 inside. @barryeisler
24mreplyretweetfavorite
bmaz @RMFifthCircuit No! Still wondering about that,
25mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Will Sammy Alito go to Mass? Will Scalia go to Mass? Will Clarence Thomas go to Mass??? Since this is all newsworthy and whatnot...
26mreplyretweetfavorite
November 2013
S M T W T F S
« Oct   Dec »
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930