NSA’s Notion of Regaining Confidence

In my apparent never-ending job of documenting all the lies, half truths, and misrepresentations the Intelligence Community has told Congress, I wanted to look at one more document from the chunk the I Con released last week: the briefing given the House Intelligence Committee on the phone dragnet on October 21, 2009, during the early part of the PATRIOT Act reauthorization debate. The briefing came three weeks after then-House Intelligence Chair Silvestre Reyes requested a document on the dragnet (which would end up being the notice provided to Congress).

Here’s the last entry in the October 21 briefing’s description of the efforts to fix the problems with the dragnet.

On September 3, 2009, after receiving extensive demonstrations and briefings regarding the BR FISA program, the FISC signed the Renewal Order for BR
FISA. The order, which will remain in effect through October 30, 2009, restores to NSA the authority to make Reasonable Articulable Suspicion (RAS) determinations as to whether specific telephone identifiers may be used as “seeds” for querying against the BR FISA metadata. The signing of the renewal order is viewed as an indication that NSA is regaining the Court’s confidence in its ability to safeguard US Person privacy while using BR FISA data for vital national security missions. [my emphasis]

That is, the NCTC and NSA claimed to HPSCI — one of two committees getting the most information on the phone dragnet — that “NSA is regaining the Court’s confidence in its ability to safeguard US Person privacy.”

But the September 3 reauthorization of the phone dragnet — the last interaction with FISC referenced in the briefing — was not the most recent event prior to this briefing.

The last event we know of, at least, came when, on September 21 and 23, Judge Reggie Walton — the judge who had been working through this process for 9 months and on September 3 had ordered NSA to restrict access to the phone dragnet data to those who had been specially trained for it — had a DOJ National Security Division attorney tell him, orally, of two “likely violations” of these orders. NSA employees were emailing results of phone dragnet queries around — had even set up an email list of 189 analysts — including to people who had not received the special training required by the Court.

Worse, NSA didn’t inform Walton of the violations.

The NSD attorney advised that NSD and NSA were investigating the foregoing incidents and expected to be in a position to submit a preliminary written notice to the Court in short order. As of the entry of this Order, the Court has not yet received such a notice.

The Court is deeply troubled by the incidents described above, which have occurred only a few weeks following the completion of an “end to end review” by the government of NSA’s procedures and processes for handling the BR metadata, and its submission of a report intended to assure the Court that NSA had addressed and corrected the issues giving rise to the history of serious and widespread compliance problems in this matter and had taken the necessary steps to ensure compliance with the Court’s orders going forward.

In his September 25 order, Walton instructed NSA to brief him on September 28 on these latest violations.

In other words, as far as the declassified record thus far shows, FISC had newfound reason to be “deeply troubled” by violations (and probably, NSA’s failure to notice the court on them) when it briefed the House Intelligence Committee on October 21.

And the Administration didn’t tell HPSCI that, right in the middle of debates about PATRIOT (and therefore Section 215) reauthorization.

And yet the I Con and its defenders insist — insist! — Congress was fully informed when it reauthorized PATRIOT.

Tweet about this on TwitterShare on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

2 Responses to NSA’s Notion of Regaining Confidence

  • 1
  • 2
Emptywheel Twitterverse
JimWhiteGNV RT @Laurie_Garrett: Dear @ChrisChristie if you stay in the race STOP talking about #Zika & quarantine. My take https://t.co/1tBeCHk8B5 @The
9mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @benjaminwittes At least my memory isn't going worse than I already thought! Thanks. @csoghoian @Susan_Hennessey
19mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @benjaminwittes Which is some of what we're learning from decisions pre- and post-OPM hack @csoghoian @Susan_Hennessey
20mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @benjaminwittes I ask bc I think NatSec elite at least APPEARS to show similar disinterest in certain CI threats @csoghoian @Susan_Hennessey
20mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @benjaminwittes Thanks Remember the redesign survey, just not the Q. @csoghoian @Susan_Hennessey
21mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @Obornee Not sure either requires voters to distinguish. Q is just what white working/middle class responds to, if they vote @ThePlumLineGS
21mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @sremkusrenner We could get into discussion of how Dems responded to collapse of unions. But there's an election to be won @ThePlumLineGS
24mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @sremkusrenner Read the post! I think it's one of best descriptions/comparisons of appeal of Trump/Bernie. @ThePlumLineGS
25mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @benjaminwittes When you say none were clamoring, did you ask? Surprised your readership wouldn't see value. @csoghoian @Susan_Hennessey
26mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @JennaMC_Laugh: FBI says it had 440 "terrorism disruptions" in 2015, but November DHS doc mentioned only 1 "foiled plot" https://t.co/aq
29mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel "Trump says our elites are weak, stupid, and corrupt. Sanders says our elites are being *corrupted*." https://t.co/sqEkvk94FV
31mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel As if Pavlov had trained them when the bell rang they got their bailout. https://t.co/tbJSdAvTIP
33mreplyretweetfavorite
November 2013
S M T W T F S
« Oct   Dec »
 12
3456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930