Richard Clarke Alludes to the Real Costs of the Dragnet

New America Foundation did a study of 225 terrorist plots to try to discern the source of the investigation. There are numerous obvious flaws to the study — many of which stem from the government’s own efforts to obscure the sources of what they do, some of which stem from a lack of awareness about how the government responded to other tips by collecting more NSA intelligence, some of which stem from ignoring the dragnet that existed in illegal form before the FISC-approved one.

With those caveats, NAF finds what has been reported for months: only the Basaaly Moalin’s provision of less than $10,000 to al-Shabaab stemmed from the phone dragnet.

Which provides the WaPo with another opportunity to report this as news. I’ll take it: any little bit helps!

WaPo and NAF also report what I reported 5 months ago: that the government delayed 2 months after identifying Moalin’s ties indirectly to Aden Ayro before wiretapping him. Remember, they say they need the dragnet to avoid delays in investigation.

Perhaps the most interesting part of WaPo’s report on this, though, are Richard Clarke’s comments. As a follow-up on the NSA Review Group’s comment on the risk to quality of life posed by the dragnet, Clarke claims the dragnet would still be too intrusive if it had contributed to every plot.

“Although we might be safer if the government had ready access to a massive storehouse of information about every detail of our lives, the impact of such a program on the quality of life and on individual freedom would simply be too great,” the group’s report said.

Said Clarke: “Even if NSA had solved every one of the [terrorist] cases based on” the phone collection, “we would still have proposed the changes.”

This is actually a fairly stunning comment (and not one, I suspect, Mike Morell, who is also quoted, would support). Even if the dragnet had identified every potential terrorist plot, Clarke says, it would still be too intrusive.

I think the dragnet is plenty intrusive — and I think plenty of the ways it infringes on privacy are those not accounted in NAF’s analysis (such as the use of the dragnet to pick targets for informants or conduct back door searches). Still: to suggest the dragnet would not be worth every single one of these leads?

Tweet about this on Twitter0Share on Reddit0Share on Facebook0Google+0Email to someone

10 Responses to Richard Clarke Alludes to the Real Costs of the Dragnet

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
  • 6
  • 7
  • 8
  • 9
  • 10
Emptywheel Twitterverse
emptywheel @tse2935 How old's grandson?
12mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @steveglista Maybe just recommend he seek work with PwC? Seems like it'd be a perfect fit. @ageis
37mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel Don't want it to happen, but am curious whether Ducey is gonna get the same kind of treatment DeBlasio go. @bmaz
37mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel RT @RobertMLee: Why Cybersecurity Dollars Do Not Add Up At the Pentagon http://t.co/1hhB1L8dyJ
40mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @tse2935 I think daytimes are for mom's w/their kids, particularly as it gets warm enough to sic them on that kid's garden.
46mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @thegrugq No Bitcoin for you? Cmon, everybody's doing it.
47mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @steveglista I repeat against my questions abt why the investigation into the investigation is in a totally different district. @bmaz
49mreplyretweetfavorite
emptywheel @steveglista Dratel's certainly gonna raise a stink. http://t.co/XbuB87e2W3 @bmaz
49mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV @Pedinska Heh. Not really. My strategy is usually "get tough or die".
59mreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV @Pedinska Thanks. I was very happy with the wonderful condition they are in. Not marked, but I'm hoping they're "Early Bird" variety.
1hreplyretweetfavorite
JimWhiteGNV @Pedinska Now just crossing my fingers they get enough sun. Will probably do some pruning on the redbud nearby.
1hreplyretweetfavorite